Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparison Between Machine Flexibility and Routing Flexibility

  • Published:
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we evaluate two types of flexibility, machine flexibility and routing flexibility, in terms of manufacturing performance in various shop environments. A simulation-based investigation was conducted to analyze the impact of these types of flexibility on the average flow time of parts under various job flow pattern conditions, which characterize the shop nature from a random job shop to a flow shop, operation time variance, setup time, and shop load. The experimental results show how these types of flexibility affect the average flow time of parts and which type is superior under what conditions. Management can obtain better insight and guidelines for determining priorities or the scale, or scope, of various decision items relating to design standardization, process and operations improvement, investment in new equipment and tools, and the like.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benjaafar, S., “Models for Performance Evaluation of Flexibility,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp. 1383-1402 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjaafar, S., Morin, T.L., and Talavage, J.J., “Strategic Value of Flexibility in Sequential Decision Making,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 82, No. 3, pp. 438-457 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjaafa, S. and Ramakrishnan, R., “Modelling, Measurement and Evaluation of Sequencing Flexibility in Manufacturing System,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 1195-1220 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, P.H. and Mandelbum, M., “One Measure of Flexibility in Manufacturing Systems,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp. 747-756 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brill, P.H. and Mandelbum, M., “Measurement of Adaptivity and Flexibility in Production Systems,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp. 325-340 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, J., Dubois, D., Rathmill, K., Sethi, S.P., and Stecke, K.E., “Classification of Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” The FMS Magazine, pp. 114-117 (April 1984).

  • Chandra, P. and Tombak, M., “Models for the Evaluation of Routing and Machine Flexibility,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 60, No. 2, pp. 156-165 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, S.K. and Nagendra, P., “Investigations into the Impact of Flexibility on Manufacturing Performance,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 31, No. 10, pp. 2337-2354 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S. and Gaimon, C., “Routing Flexibility and Production Scheduling in a Flexible Manufacturing System,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 344-364 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyun, J.H. and Ahn, B.H., “A Unifying Framework for Manufacturing Flexibility,” Manufacturing Perspective, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 251-260 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodi, F., Tierney, E.J., and Mosier, C.T., “Dynamic Group Scheduling Heuristics in a Flow-through Cell Environment,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 61-85 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, P.S., “The Examination of Worker Cross-Training in a Dual Resource Constrained Job Shop,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 291-299 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipoom, P.R. and Fry, T.D., “Capacity-Based Order Review/Release Strategies to Improve Manufacturing Performance,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 30, No. 11, pp. 2559-2572 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethi, A.K. and Sethi, S.P., “Flexibility in Manufacturing—A Survey,” International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 289-328 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsubone, H. and Matsuura, H., “On the Flexibility of the Production System,” JIMA, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 1-12 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wemmerlöv, U., “Fundamental Insights into Part Family Scheduling,” Decision Sciences, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 565-595 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao, D.D. and Pei, F., “Flexible Parts Routing in Manufacturing Systems,” IIE Transactions, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 48-55 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Technology, Hino City, Japan

    Hitoshi Tsubone & Mitsuyoshi Horikawa

Authors
  1. Hitoshi Tsubone
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mitsuyoshi Horikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsubone, H., Horikawa, M. A Comparison Between Machine Flexibility and Routing Flexibility. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 11, 83–101 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008096724273

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008096724273

Search

Navigation