Skip to main content
Log in

The role of microalgae in aquaculture: situation and trends

Journal of Applied Phycology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Algae are utilized diversely in aquaculture, but theirmain applications are related to nutrition. They areused in toto, as a sole component or as a foodadditive to supply basic nutrients, color the flesh ofsalmonids or for other biological activities. The needfor nutritional sources safer than traditional animalproducts has renewed interest in plants in general andalgae in particular. This report deals principallywith the nutritional role of microalgae inaquaculture.The larvae of molluscs, echinoderms andcrustaceans as well as the live prey of some fishlarvae feed on microalgae. Though attempts have beenmade to substitute inert particles for thesemicro-organisms which are difficult to produce,concentrate and store, only shrimp and live prey forfish will accept inert food, and only shrimp accept itfully. Several studies have confirmed that a live,multi-specific, low-bacteria microalgal biomassremains essential for shellfish hatcheries. Majoradvances are expected from new production systemdesigns and operations, from batch-run open tanks tomore sophisticated continuously run and closed loopreactors. Studies are underway to simplify hatcheryoperations by replacing biomass produced on-site withrun-times by that produced and preserved elsewhere.Although still promising, they have not given rise, sofar, to any application for molluscs. Otherapplications of microalgae in aquaculture, from greenwater to making salmon flesh pinker, are examined.Whether produced on or off-site, there remains thequestion of cost effectiveness of microalgalproduction systems. This can only be achieved bysubstantial upscaling and improved quality control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Apt KE, Behrens PW (1999) Commercial developments in microalgal biotechnology. J. Phycol. 35: 215-226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barille L, Bougrier S, Geairon P, Robert JM (1994) Experimental feeding of the oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg) with three populations of different-sized modes of the diatom Haslea ostrearia Simonsen. Oceanol. Acta 17: 201-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benemann JR (1992) Microalgae aquaculture feeds, J. appl. Phycol. 4: 233-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowitzka MA, Huisman JM, Osborn A (1991) Culture of the astaxanthin-producing green alga Haematococcus pluvialis. 1. Effects of nutrients on growth and cell type. J. appl. Phycol. 3: 295-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borowitzka MA (1996) Closed algal photobioreactors: Design considerations for large-scale systems. J. mar. Biotechn. 4: 185-191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhert P, Divanach P, Kentouri M, Sorgeloos P (1998) Rearing techniques for difficult fish larvae. World Aquacult. 29: 48-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladue RM (1998) Heterotrophic microalgae as an inexpensive feed for rotifer. J. Shellfish Res. 17: 325-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grizel H, Tige G (1982) Evolution of the haemocytic disease caused by Bonamia ostreae. In Invertebrate Pathology and Microbial Control. Society for Invertebrate Pathology, Brighton, UK, pp. 258-260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grizel H, Heral M (1991) Introduction into France of the Japanese oyster (Crassostrea gigas). J. Cons. CIEM 47: 399-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longhurst A, Sathyendranah S, Platt T, Caverhill C (1995) An estimate of global primary production in the ocean from satellite radiometer data. J. Plankton Res. 17: 1245-1271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Feuga A (1997) Microalgues Marines, Les Enjeux de la Recherche. Ifremer, Plouzané, France, 35 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller-Feuga A, Gudin C, Grima EM, Minkoff G, Tredici M, Raineri S, Robert R (1998) Microalgae biomass from photobioreactors as food for fish and shellfish larvae. European Comm. Proj. AIR1-CT92-286. Third Europ. Marine Sc. & Tech. Conf., Project synopses, Lisbon-Portugal 20: 33-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newkirk GF (1991) Aquaculture in Sungo Bay, China. Austasia Aquacult. 5: 8-11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paillard C, Maes P, Oubella R (1994) Brown ring disease in clams. Annu. Rev. Fish Dis. 4: 219-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly D, Christensen V (1995) Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374: 255-257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert R, Trintignac P (1997) Substitues for live microalagae in mariculture: A review. Aquat. Living Resour. 10: 315-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberry B (ed.) (1998) World Shrimp Farming. Shrimp News Int. San Diego, CA, USA, 328 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson GW, Jolly AF (1994) The value of Phaffia yeast as a feed ingredient for salmonid fish. Aquaculture 124: 193-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shatz Y (1999) Fishstat Plus 2.19, FAO, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Q, Fang J (1999) Aquaculture of scallops in China. Abstracts of the 12th Int. Pectinid Workshop, Bergen-Norway, 1 pp.

  • Verdelho Vieira V, Baylina N (1995) Necton microalgae biotechnology directory. Universidade Catolica Portuguesa, 131 pp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muller-Feuga, A. The role of microalgae in aquaculture: situation and trends. Journal of Applied Phycology 12, 527–534 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008106304417

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008106304417

Navigation