Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Privatization on Public Transit Costs

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an effort to reduce operating deficits, increase productivity, and improve the quality of services, the public transit sector has been moving away from public ownership and operation and towards a franchising arrangement whereby a local government authorizes a private firm to manage and operate the city's public transit system. Profit maximization considerations imply that private managers have stronger incentives for cost efficiency. One such example is the city of Indianapolis which began privatization efforts in its transit operations in 1996. Based upon monthly data from January 1991 through March 1997, this study examines the effect of privatization on the city's cost of providing mass transit. The primary implication of the study is that Indianapolis has experienced an annual 2.5% reduction in operating costs since privatizing the management of its public transit system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altschuler, A. 1981. The Financial and Productivity Problems of Urban Public Transportation: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Public Works and Transportation. Testimony before the U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebaum, E., and J. Berechman. 1991. “Demand Conditions, Regulation and the Measurement of Productivity.” Journal of Econometrics 47: 379-400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, M.E., and S. Glaister. 1985a. “Deregulating the Bus Industry in Britain — A Response.” Transport Reviews, 5(2): 133-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, M.E., and S. Glaister. 1985b. “Deregulating the Bus Industry in Britain — A Reply.” Transport Reviews, 5: 223-224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, J., and K. Obeng. 1990. “The Effect of Policy and Background Variables on Total Factor Productivity for Public Transit”. Transportation Research 24B: 1-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berechman, J. 1987. “Cost Structure and Production Technology in Transit.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 17: 519-534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berechman, J. 1993. Public Transit Economics and Deregulation Policy North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berechman, J., and G. Giuliano. 1984. “Analysis of the Cost Structure of an Urban Bus Transit Property.” Transportation Research B 18B(4/5): 277-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E. R. 1991. The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, E., and N.E. Savin. 1975. “Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Singular Equation Systems with Autoregressive Disturbances.” Econometrica 43: 937-958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bly, P. H., and R.H. Oldfield. 1986. “The Effects of Public Transport Subsidies on Demand and Supply.” Transportation Research, 20A(8): 415-427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bristow, A.L., P.G. Hopkinson, C.A. Nash, and M. Wardman. 1991. Use and Non-Use Benefits of Public Transport Systems — What is Their Relevance, Can They be Valued? Paper Presented at the Second International Conference on Privatization and Deregulation in Passenger Transportation, June 16–20, Tampere, Finland.

  • Cervero, R.T. 1984. “Cost and Performance Impacts of Transit Subsidy Programs.” Transportation Research A 18A: 407-413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colburn, C., and W. Talley. 1992. “A Firm Specific Analysis of Economies of Size in the U.S. Urban Multiservice Transit Industry.” Transportation Research B 26B(3): 195-206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colson, B. 1996. “U.K. Bus Deregulation: A Qualified Success with Much Still to Offer Customers and Society at Large.” Transport Reviews 16(4): 301-311.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rus, G. 1989. “Public Transport Demand in Spain.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy (May): 189-201.

  • Dogson, J.S., and K. Katsoulakos. 1988. “Quality Competition in Bus Services.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 22(3): 263-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, C. 1988. “Private and Public Local Bus Services Compared: The Case of New York.” Transportation Quarterly 42(4): 553-570

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, G.J. 1987. Managing Pubic Transit Strategically. Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankena, M.W. 1987. “Capital-Biased Subsidies, Bureaucratic Monitoring, and Bus Scrapping.” Journal of Urban Economics 21: 180-193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano, G., and R.F. Teal. 1985. “Privately Provided Commuter Bus Services: Experiences, Problems, and Prospects.” In Urban Transit: The Private Challenge to Public Transportation, edited by C. Lave. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA., 151-179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Ibanez, J. A., and J.R. Meyer. 1997. “Alternatives for Urban Bus Services: An International Perspective on the British Reforms.” Transport Reviews 17: 17-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwilliam, K.M., C.A. Nash, and P.J. Mackie. 1985a. “Deregulating the Bus Industry in Britain — The Case Against.” Transport Reviews 24(3): 105-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwilliam, K.M., C.A. Nash, and P.J. Mackie. 1985b. “Deregulating the Bus Industry in Britain: A Rejoiner.” Transport Reviews 5: 215-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensher, D. 1987. “Productive Efficiency and Ownership of Urban Bus Services.” Transportation 14: 209-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlaftis, M.G., and P.S. McCarthy. 1997. “Subsidy and Public Transit Performance: A Factor Analytic Approach.” Transportation 24(3): 253-270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlaftis, M.G., et al. 1998. “The Structure of Public Transit Costs in the Presence of Multiple Serial Correlation”. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Purdue University.

  • Meyer, J.R., and C.V. Oster, Jr. 1987. Deregulation of the Future of Inter-city Passenger Travel. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morlok, E., and P. Viton. 1985. The Comparative Costs of Public and Private Providers of Mass Transit”. In Urban Transit: The Private Challenge to Public Transportation, edited by C. Lave. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA., 233-253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, M. 1963. “Returns to Scale in Electricity Supply.” In Measurement in Econometrics in Memory of Yehuda Grunfeld, edited by C.F. Christ, et al. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeng, K. 1984. “The Economics of Bus Transit Operation.” The Logistics and Transportation Review 20(1): 45-65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeng, K., W.K. Talley, and C. Colburn. 1994. “The Effects of Subsides on Public Transit Long-Run Costs.” Proceedings, Transportation Research Forum, 36th Annual Meeting, 127-149.

  • Obeng, K., et al. 1986. “A Total Factor Productivity Analysis of Public Transit”. Final Report, Office of University Research, USDOT.

  • Orski, K.C. 1985. Redesigning Local transportation Services. In Public Transit, edited by C. Lave. Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pashigian, P. 1976. “Consequences and Carses of public Ownership of Urban Transit Facilities.” Journal of Political Economy 84(6): 1239-1259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, F., and T. Babitsky. 1988. “Organizational Form and Performance in Urban Mass Transit.” Transportation Reviews 82: 125-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickrell, D. 1985. “Rising Deficits and the Uses of Transit Subsidies in the United States.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 19(3): 281-298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pucher, J.L., and A. Markstedt. 1982. “Consequences of Public Ownership and Subsidies for Mass Transit: Evidence from Case Studies and Regression Analysis.” Transportation 11: 323-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pucher, J.L., A. Markstedt, and I. Hirchman. 1983. “Impacts of Subsidies on the Cost of Urban Pubic Transport.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 17(3): 155-176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pucher, J. 1995. “Urban Passenger Transport in the United States and Europe: a Comparative analysis of Public Policies — Part 2: Public Transport, Overall Comparisons and Recommendations.” Transport Reviews 15(3): 211-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, I. 1997. “Scale Economies in United States Rail Transit Systems.” Transportation Research 31A: 459-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltzman, A. 1979. The Decline of Transit. In Public Transportation: Planning, Operations and Management, edited by G.E. Gray and L.A. Hoel. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shughart, W. F., and M.S. Kimenyi. 1991. “A Public Choice Analysis of Public Transit Operating Subsidies.” Research in Law and Economics 14: 251-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, A. U. 1985. “Implications of Efficiency Incentives on Use of Private Sector Contracting by the Public Transit Industry”. In Urban Transit: The Private Challenge to Public Transportation, edited by C. Lave. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge, MA., 299-309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smerk, G.M. 1974. Urban Mass Transportation: A Dozen Years of Federal Policy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smerk, G.M. 1979. The Development of Public Transportation and the City. In Public Transportation: Planning, Operations and Management, edited by G.E. Gray and L.A. Hoel. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teal, R.F. 1988. “Public Transit Service Contracting: A Status Report.” Transportation Quarterly 42(2): 207-222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, W. Kip, et al. 1995. Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. 2nd Edition. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viton, P. A. 1992. “Consolidations of Scale and Scope in Urban Transit.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 22: 25-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viton, P.A. 1981. “On Competition and Product Differentiation in Urban Transportation: The San Francisco Bay Area.” Bell Journal of Economics 12: 362-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viton, P. A. 1993. “Once Again, The Costs of Urban Rapid Transit.” Transportation Research 27B: 401-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viton, P.A. 1982. “Privately-Provided Urban Transport Services Entry Deterrence and Welfare.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 16(1): 85-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., and A. Dalal. 1981. “Estimation of the Elasticity of Factor Substitution in Urban Bus Transportation: A Cost Function Approach.” Journal of Regional Science 21(2): 263-275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M., and C. Hall. 1981. “Returns to Scale in the United States Intercity Bus Industry.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 11: 573-584.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ADK Consulting Engineers, Athens, Greece, 106-81

    Matthew Karlaftis

  2. Purdue University Department of Economics, West Lafayette, IN, 47907

    Patrick McCarthy

Authors
  1. Matthew Karlaftis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Patrick McCarthy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karlaftis, M., McCarthy, P. The Effect of Privatization on Public Transit Costs. Journal of Regulatory Economics 16, 27–44 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008179629733

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008179629733

Keywords

Search

Navigation