Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Importance of Ethics in Environmental Economics with a Focus on Existence Values

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The importance of ethics and fundamental value judgments in environmental economics is high-lighted by discussing the controversial concept of existence values. The social value depends crucially on the social objective, which is not necessarily self-evident, e.g., since some individuals tend to value nature intrinsically. It is shown that the motives behind willingness to pay figures matter for the social value, and the conventional view that people respond to CV questions solely in order to maximize their own utility or well-being is questioned. The importance of being explicit about value judgments is emphasized, and it is argued that environmental economics should consider non-conventional assumptions which take the social context into account to a larger degree.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoni, J. (1989), ‘Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence’, Journal of Political Economy 97(6), 1447–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1990), ‘Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm Glow Giving’, Economic Journal 100, 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1995), ‘Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?’ American Economic Review 85, 891–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldred, J. (1994), ‘Existence Value, Welfare and Altruism’, Environmental Values 3, 381–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibald, G. C. and D. Donaldson (1976), ‘Non-paternalism and the Basic Theorems of Welfare Economics’, Canadian Journal of Economics 9, 492–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K., R. Solow, P. R. Portney, E. E. Leamer, R. Radner and H. Schuman (1993), Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, Resources For the Future, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azar, C. (1998), ‘Are Optimal CO2 Emissions Really Optimal? Four Critical Issues for Economists in the Greenhouse’, Environmental and Resource Economics 11, this issue.

  • Bentham, J. (1996) [1822], An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, The collected works of Jeremy Bentham, J. H. Burns and H. L. A. Hart, eds., Oxford Univeristy Press.

  • Bergstrom, T. C. (1982). ‘When Is a Man's Life Worth More than His Human Capital?’ in M. W. Jones-Lee, ed., The Value of Life and Safety. North-Holland.

  • Bishop, R. C. (1978), ‘Endangered Species and Uncertainty: The Economics of a Safe Minimum Standard’, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 60(1), 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C. (1990), ‘Economic Policy in a Second-best Environment’, Canadian Journal of Economics 23, 748–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R. (1974) ‘The Welfare Foundations of Cost-benefit Analysis’, Economic Journal 84, 926–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boadway, R. and M. Keen (1993) ‘Public Goods, Self-selection and Optimal Income Taxation’, International Economic Review 34(3), 463–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blamey, R., M. Common and J. Quiggin (1994), ‘Respondents to Contingent Valuation Surveys: Consumers or Citizens?’ Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics 39(3), 263–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broome, J. (1991a), Weighing Goods. Cambridge MA: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, V. (1981), ‘Evaluation of Public Projects under Optimal Taxation’, Review of Economic Studies 48, 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Common, M., I. Reid and R. Blamey (1997), ‘Do Existence Values for Cost Benefit Analysis Exist?’ Environmental and Resource Economics 9, 228–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowards, T. (1997), ‘Nonuse Values and the Environment: Economic and Ethical Motivations’, Environmental Values 6(2), 143–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, R. G. and G. W. Harrison (1995), ‘The Measurement and Decomposition of Nonuse Values: a Critical Review’, Environmental and Resource Economics 5, 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1993), An Inquiry into Well-Being and Destitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. A. and J. A. Hausman (1994), ‘Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. and V. Norman, (1978) ‘Advertising and Welfare’, Bell Journal of Economics 9(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, H. D. (1997), ‘Controversy – Economics and Happiness’, Economic Journal 107, 1812–1814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin, R. A. (1995), ‘Will Raising the Incomes of All Increase the Happiness of All?’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27, 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. F. (1986), ‘Ethical Preferences and the Assessment of Existence Values: Does the Neoclassical Model Fit?’ Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 15(2), 145–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. F. (1992), ‘Rethinking Existence Values’, Land Economics 6, 120–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1989a), ‘Social Norms and Economic Theory’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4), 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1989b), The Cement of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. and J. E. Roemer (1991), Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being, Studies in Rationality and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1985a), ‘The Demand for Unobservable and Other Nonpositional Goods’, American Economic Review 75, 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1985b), Choosing the Right Pond. Human Behavior and the Quest for Status. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. H. (1997), ‘The Frame of Reference as a Public Good’, Economic Journal 107, 1832–1847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. M. III (1993), The Measurements of Environmental and Resource Values. Resources For the Future, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, V. R. (1996), ‘Economics, Values, and Health Care Reform’, American Economic Review 86, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasser, H. (1998), ‘Ethical Perspectives and Environmental Policy Analysis’, in J. C. J. M. van den Bergh, ed., Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, forthcoming, chapter 66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J. M.. (1997), ‘The Value of Biodiversity: Markets, Society, and Ecosystems’, Land Economics 73(1), 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamlin, A. P. (1996), Ethics and Economics. The international library of critical writings in economics 63. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann, W. M. (1994), ‘Valuing the Environment through Contingent Valuation’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod, R. F. (1938), ‘Scope and Methods of Economics’, Economic Journal 48, 383–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. M. and M. S. McPherson (1993), ‘Taking Ethics Seriously: Economics and Contemporary Moral Philosophy’, Journal of Economic Literature 31(2), 671–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. M. and M. S. McPherson (1996), Economic Analysis and Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A. (ed.) (1993), Contingent Valuation: a Critical Assessment, Contributions to Economic Analysis, vol. 220. North-Holland.

  • Hicks, J. R. (1939), Value and Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, H. M. and J. D. Rodgers (1969), ‘Pareto Optimal Redistribution’, American Economic Review 59(4), 542–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, O. (1997), ‘Optimal Pigouvian Taxes with Regard to Altruism’, Land Economics 73(3), 297–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, P.-O. (1992), ‘Altruism in Cost-benefit Analysis’, Environmental and Resource Economics 2, 605–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M. W. (1992), ‘Paternalistic Altruism and the Value of a Statistical Life’, Economic Journal 102, 80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and J. L. Knetsch (1992a), ‘Valuing Public Goods: the Purchase of Moral Satisfaction’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22(1), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and J. L. Knetsch (1992b), ‘Contingent Valuation and the Value of Public Goods: Reply’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22(1), 90–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1939), ‘Welfare Propositions and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility’, Economic Journal 49, 549–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennet, D. A. (1980), ‘Altruism and Economic Behavior, 1: Developments in the Theory of Public and Private Redistribution’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology 39(2), 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. A. and D. E. Mercer (1997), ‘Valuing a Global Environmental Good: U.S. Residents’ Willingness to Pay to Protect Tropical Rain Forests’, Land Economics 73, 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krutilla, J. (1967), ‘Conservation Reconsidered’, American Economic Review 57, 777–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazo J. K., G. H. McClelland and W. D. Schulze (1997), ‘Economic Theory And Psychology of Non Use Values’, Land Economics 73(3), 358–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madariaga, B. and K. E. McConnell (1987), ‘Exploring Existence Value’, Water Resources Research 23, 936–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. (1993), ‘Is Sympathy an Economic Value? Philosophy, Economics, and the Contingent Valuation Method’, in Hausman (1993).

  • Mirrlees, J. A. (1971), ‘An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation’, Review of Economic Studies 38, 175–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. C. and R. T. Carson (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. (1969), Objectivity in Social Research. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Y.-K. (1997), ‘A Case Fore Happiness, Cardinalism, and Interpersonal Comparability’, Economic Journal 107, 1848–1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, B., R. Costanza and R. C. Bishop (1998), ‘The Evolution of Preferences – Why “Sovereign” Preferences May Not Lead to Sustainable Policies and What to Do about it’, Ecological Economics 24(2, 3), 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Riordan, T. and A. Jordan (1995), ‘The Precautionary Principle in Contemporary Environmental Politics’, Environmental Values 4, 191–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions series, Cambridge University Press.

  • Oswald, A. J. (1997), ‘Happiness and Economic Performance’, Economic Journal 107, 1815–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, R. A. (1978), ‘Endogenous Tastes in Demand and Welfare Analysis’, American Economic Review 68, 374–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney, P. R. (1994), ‘The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1993), ‘Objectivity and the Science-Ethics Distinction’, in M. C. Nussbaum and A. Sen, eds., The Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, L. (1935), An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1998), Changing Tastes. How Evolution and Experience Shape Economic Behaviour, Oscar Morgenstern Memorial Lectures, Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.

  • Sagoff, M. (1994), ‘Four Dogmas of Environmental Economics’, Environmental Values 3(4), 285–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagoff, M. (1998), ‘Aggregation and Deliberation in Valuing Environmental Public Goods: A Look Beyond Contingent Pricing’, Ecological Economics 24(2, 3), 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1950), ‘Evaluation of Real National Income’, Oxford Economic Papers, NS2, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1954), ‘The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure’, Review of Economic Studies 36, 387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scitovsky, T. (1941), ‘A Note on Welfare Propositions in Economics’, Review of Economic Studies, 77–88.

  • Sen, A. K. (1977), ‘Rational Fools: a Critique of the Behavioural Assumptions of Economic Theory’, Philosophy and Public affairs 6, 317–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1985), ‘Goals, Commitment, and Identity’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1(2), 341–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1987), On Ethics & Economics. Blackwell.

  • Singer, P. (1975), Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals. New York: Avon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1979), Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. K. (1992), ‘Arbitrary Values, Good Causes, and Premature Verdicts: Comment’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22(1), 71–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spash, C. L. (1993), ‘Economics, Ethics, and Long-Term Environmental Damages’, Environmental Ethics 15, 117–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spash, C.L. and N. Hanley (1995), ‘Preferences, Information and Biodiversity Preservation’, Ecological Economics 12, 195–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1982), ‘On the Economics of Philantropy’, Economic Journal 92, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A. and D. W. Bromley (1994), ‘Choices Without Prices Without Apologies’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26(2), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, D. (1997), Economics and Ethics: An Introduction to Theory, Institutions, and Policy. Praeger.

  • Weston, S. C. (1994), ‘Toward a Better Understanding of the Positive/Normative Distinction in Economics’, Economics and Philosophy 10, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Göteborg University, SE-40530, Göteborg, Sweden

    Olof Johansson-Stenman

Authors
  1. Olof Johansson-Stenman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johansson-Stenman, O. The Importance of Ethics in Environmental Economics with a Focus on Existence Values. Environ Resource Econ 11, 429–442 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008239427421

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008239427421

Search

Navigation