Skip to main content
Log in

WTA Estimates Using the Method of Paired Comparison: Tests of Robutness

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The method of paired comparison is modified to allow choices between two alternative gains so as to estimate willingness to accept (WTA) without loss aversion. The robustness of WTA values for two public goods is tested with respect to sensitivity of the WTA measure to the context of the bundle of goods used in the paired comparison exercise and to the scope (scale) of the public good project. There was no statistical difference in WTA measures for open space based on independent treatments with different contexts. One treatment involved valuing open space within a set of goods with similar value. The other treatment involved valuing open space within a choice set of goods which had lower dollar values than open space. There was a statistical difference in WTA between a permanent expansion in the bus system and a temporary expansion in the bus system. We conclude the method of paired comparison appears to be a very promising approach to elicit measures of WTA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bromley, D. W. (1995), 'Property Rights and Natural Resource Damage Assessments', Ecological Economics 14, 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. C. and T. C. Daniel (1987), 'Context Effects in Perceived Environmental Quality Assessment: Scene Selection and Landscape Quality Ratings', Journal of Environmental Psychology 7, 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T. (1995), 'Contingent Valuation Surveys and Tests of Insensitivity to Scope', Unpublished Manuscript, Department of Economics, University of California, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, R. T., N. E. Flores, K. M. Martin and J. L. Wright (1996), 'Contingent Valuation and Revealed Preference Methodologies: Comparing the Estimates for Quasi-Public Goods', Land Economics 71, 80–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, H. A. (1988), The Method of Paired Comparisons, Charles Griffin & Company, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desvousges, W. H., F. R. Johnson, R. W. Dunford, K. J. Boyle, S. P. Hudson and K. N. Wilson (1992), Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability, in Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, Cambridge Economics, Inc.

  • Fechner, G. T. (1860), Elemente der Psychophysik, Breitkopf and Härtel, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franciosi, R., P. Kajual, R. Michelitsch and R. Smith (1993), 'Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect', unpublished manuscript.

  • Hoehn, J. P. and J. B. Loomis (1993), 'Substitution Effects in the Valuations of Multiple Environmental Programs', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25, 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and J. Knetsch (1992), 'Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 22, 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch and R. H. Thaler (1990), 'Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem', Journal of Political Economy 98, 1325–1347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, J., G. L. Peterson, T. C. Brown, P. Champ and B. Lucero (1996), 'Estimating WTA Using the Method of Paired Comparison and its Relationship to WTP Estimated using Dichotomous CVM', Proceedings 1996 W133 Regional Research Meeting.

  • Magat, W. A., W. K. Viscusi and J. Huber (1988), 'Paired Comparison and Contingent Valuation Approaches to Morbidity Risk Valuation', Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15, 395–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U. S. Department of Commerce (1993), Natural Resource Damage Assessments under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Federal Register 58, 4601–4614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parducci, A. (1968), 'The Relativism of Absolute Judgments', Scientific American 219, 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, G. L. and T. C. Brown (1997), Economic Valuation by the Method of Paired Comparison with Emphasis on Tests of the Transitivity Axiom, Rocky Mountain Experiment Station Working Paper No. 97-2.

  • Peterson, G. L., T. C. Brown, D. W. McCollum, P. A. Bell, A. A. Birjulin and A. Clarke (1996), 'Moral Responsibility Effects in Valuation of WTA for Public and Private Goods by the Method of Paired Comparison', in W. L. Adamowicz, P. C. Boxall, M. K. Luckert, W. E. Phillips, and W. A. White eds., Forestry, Economics and the Environment, CAB International, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, A. and J. P. Hoehn (1992) 'Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation: Implications for Natural Resource Damage Assessment', Staff paper 9214, Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University.

  • Randall, A., J. P. Hoehn and G. S. Tolley (1981) 'The Structure of Contingent Markets: Some Results of a Recent Experiment', Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Economic Association, Washington, DC.

  • SPSS Exact Tests 7.0 for Windows (1996). Chicago, IL.

  • Thurston, L. L. (1927) 'A Law of Comparative Judgment', Psychological Review 34, 273–286.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Champ, P.A., Loomis, J.B. WTA Estimates Using the Method of Paired Comparison: Tests of Robutness. Environmental and Resource Economics 12, 375–386 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008265128762

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008265128762

Navigation