Skip to main content
Log in

More tax evasion research required in new millennium

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholarly communication across disciplines is much harder than within disciplines. This article highlights the pervasive phenomenon of tax evasion and discusses the different theoretical models and research approaches that have been used to study the problem in the last two decades. Much of this research has been conducted in the U.S. Policy approaches suggested by this research may therefore have limited applicability in other countries. With theoretical models from a variety of disciplines available to use, and many unanswered questions remaining, international comparisons and multi-method approaches should be useful to the many policymakers and academic researchers interested in understanding the puzzle of tax compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour, (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Allingham and A. Sandmo, “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis,” Journal of Public Economics 1972, 1, 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James Alm, “A Perspective on the Experimental Analysis of Taxpayer Reporting,” The Accounting Review 1991, 66, 577–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Alm, G. McClelland and W. Schulze, “Why do People Pay Taxes?” Journal of Public Economics 1992, 48, 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Beck, J. Davis and W. Jung, “Tax Practitioners and Reporting under Uncertainty: Theory and Experimental Evidence,” Contemporary Accounting Research, 1996, 12, 49–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Beron, H. Tauchen and A. Witte, “The Effects of Audits and Socioeconomic Variables on Compliance,” in J. Slemrod (ed.), Why People Pay Taxes, (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Cuccia, “The Effects of Increased Sanctions on Paid Tax Preparers: Integrating Economic and Psychological Factors,” The Journal of the American Taxation, 1994, 16, 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dubin, M. Graetz and L. Wilde, “The Effect of Audit Rates on the Federal Income Tax, 1977–1986,” National Tax Journal 1990, 43, 395–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Eagly and S. Chaiken, The Psychology of Attitudes, (Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Elffers, H. Robben and D. Hessing, “On Measuring Tax Evasion,” Journal of Economic Psychology 1992, 13, 545–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Falkinger, “Tax Evasion and Equity: A Theoretical Analysis,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques 1988, 43, 388–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm Gammie and Adrian Shipwright, (eds.), Striking the Balance: Tax Administration, Enforcement and Compliance in the 1990s, (London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Geeroms and H. Wilmots, “An Empirical Model of Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques, 1985, 40, 190–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Groenland and G. van Veldhoven, “Tax Evasion Behaviour: A Psychological Framework,” Journal of Economic Psychology 1983, 3, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roger Groves, Survey Errors and Survey Costs, (New York: John Wiley, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • George Guttman, “Increasing Voluntary Compliance to Over 90 percent is Unlikely,” Tax Notes 1994, 63, 146–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis Hanno and George Violette, “An Analysis of Moral and Social Influences on Taxpayer Behavior,” Behavioral Research in Accounting 1996, 8, 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hasseldine, “How do Revenue Audits Affect Taxpayer Compliance?” Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation 1993, 47, 424–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hasseldine, “Prospect Theory and Tax Reporting Decisions: Implications for Tax Administrators,” Bulletin for International Fiscal Documentation 1998, 47, 501–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hasseldine and K. Bebbington, “Blending Economic Deterrence and Fiscal Psychology Models in the Design of Responses to Tax Evasion: The New Zealand Experience,” Journal of Economic Psychology 1991, 12, 299–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Hessing, H. Elffers and R. Weigel, “Exploring the Limits of Self-Reports and Reasoned Action: An Investigation of the Psychology of Tax Evasion Behavior,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54, 405–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peggy Hite, “A Positive Approach to Taxpayer Compliance,” Public Finance/Finances Publiques 1989, 44, 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peggy Hite and Gary McGill, “An Examination of Taxpayer Preference for Aggressive Tax Advice,” National Tax Journal 1992, 45, 252–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betty Jackson and Valerie Milliron, “Tax Compliance Research: Findings, Problems, Prospects,” Journal of Accounting Literature 1986, 5, 125–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk,” Econometrica 1979, 47, 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karyl Kinsey, Survey Data on Tax Compliance: A Compendium and Review, Working paper #8716, (Chicago: American Bar Foundation, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Karyl Kinsey, Measurement Bias or Honest Disagreement? Problems of Validating Measures of Tax Evasion, Working paper #8811, (Chicago: American Bar Foundation, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Klepper, M. Mazur and D. Nagin, “Expert Intermediaries and Legal Compliance: The Case of Tax Preparers,” Journal of Law and Economics 1991, 34, 205–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alan Lewis, The Psychology of Taxation, (Martin Robertson, Oxford, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Long and D. Burnham, “Solving the Nation's Budget Deficit with a Bigger, Tougher IRS: What are the Realities?” Tax Notes 1990, 48,6, 741–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Long and J. Swingen, “Taxpayer Compliance: Setting New Agendas for Research,” Law & Society Review 1991, 25, 637–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doreen McBarnet, “The Construction of Compliance and the Challenge for Control: The Limits of Non-Compliance Research,” in Joel Slemrod (ed.), Why do People Pay Taxes, (Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Valerie Milliron and Daniel Toy, “Tax Compliance: An Investigation of Key Features,” The Journal of the American Taxation Association 1988, 9, 84–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Pratt and W. Kulsrud, Federal Taxation — 1997 edition, (Chicago: Richard D. Irwin, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • John Prebble, “Self Assessment, Audit Efficiency and Administrative Developments” in Malcolm Gammie and Adrian Shipwright (eds.), Striking the Balance: Tax Administration, Enforcement and Compliance in the 1990s, (London: Institute for Fiscal Studies, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey Roth, John Scholz and Ann Witte (eds.) Taxpayer Compliance: Volume 1: An Agenda for Research, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey Roth and John Scholz (eds.), Taxpayer Compliance: Volume 2: Social Science Perspectives, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedric Sandford (ed.), Successful Tax Reform, Lessons from an Analysis of Tax Reform in Six Countries, (Bath: Fiscal Publications, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedric Sandford (ed.), Tax Compliance Costs Measurement and Policy, (Bath: Fiscal Publications, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedric Sandford (ed.), Further Key Issues in Tax Reform, (Bath: Fiscal Publications, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dan Schisler, “An Experimental Examination of Factors Affecting Tax Preparers Aggressiveness: A Prospect Theory Approach,” The Journal of the American Tax Association 1994, 16, 124–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Schwartz and S. Orleans, “On Legal Sanctions,” University of Chicago Law Review 1967, 25, 274–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzanne Scotchmer, “Audit Classes and Tax Enforcement Policy,” American Economic Review 1987, 77, 229–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzanne Scotchmer and Joel Slemrod, “Randomness in Tax Enforcement,” Journal of Public Economics 1989, 39, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Shapiro, “IRS Director of Practice Shapiro Comments on Proposed Changes to Circular 230,” Tax Notes 1987, 34, 1150–1155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joel Slemrod, “Why People Pay Taxes: Introduction,” in Joel Slemrod (ed.), Why People Pay Taxes, (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Smith and K. Kinsey, “Understanding Taxpayer Behaviour: A Conceptual Framework with Implications for Research,” Law and Society Review 1987, 21, 639–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles Vehorn and John Brondolo, “Organizational Options for Tax Administration,” Paper presented at a conference on Tax Administration: Institution Building in Transition — Tax Evasion, Compliance Costs, and Taxpayers' Rights, (Zagreb: Institute of Public Finance, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ian Wallschutzky, “Minimising Evasion and Avoidance: Lessons from Australia,” in Cedric Sandford (ed.), Key Issues in Tax Reform, (Bath: Fiscal Publications, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Webley, H. Robben, H. Elffers and D. Hessing, Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Westat Inc., “Executive Summary: Individual Income Tax Compliance Factors Study,” Study for the Internal Revenue Service, (Rockville, Md.: Westat, Inc., 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Weigel, D. Hessing and H. Elffers, “Tax Evasion Research: A Critical Appraisal and Theoretical Model,” Journal of Economic Psychology 1987, 8, 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasseldine, J., Li, Z. More tax evasion research required in new millennium. Crime, Law and Social Change 31, 91–104 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324726125

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008324726125

Keywords

Navigation