Skip to main content
Log in

Biological control of cereal seed-borne diseases by seed bacterization with greenhouse-selected bacteria

  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

About 400 bacterial strains, isolated from roots of wild and cultivated plants, were screened for effects against diseases caused by Drechslera teres and/or Microdochium nivale in greenhouse tests and against common bunt caused by Tilletia caries in field tests. Four of the strains showed good biocontrol activity <70% disease reduction) against D. teres and T. caries both in screenings and field tests. One Pseudomonas isolate, MA 342, strongly and reliably suppressed both D. teres and T. caries in the field, while effects against M. nivale were weaker. The effects could not be enhanced by varying pre-application or seed application procedures. This isolate could be stored as a suspension in a refrigerator, frozen or applied to seeds for at least one month without loosing its disease controlling ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsen S (1992) Methods for testing fungal antagonists against Drechslera teres on barley seeds. Bulletin OILB/SROP 15: 27–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali Haimoud DE, Mostafa M, Barrault G and Albertini L (1993) Evaluation of organisms antagonistic to the sclerotioid organs of Drechslera teres, the causal agent of net blotch. Plant Disease 77: 1251–1255

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundsson A and Hökeberg M (1984) Betning med mikro-organismer mot Drechslera teres, Drechslera graminea och Ustilago hordei. Examensarbeten 1983: 4. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Dept of Plant and Forest Protection

  • Brown ME (1974) Seed and root bacterization. Ann Rev Phytopathol 12: 181–197

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruyne E, Renwick A, Fattori M, Iriarte V and Resca R (1991) Screening Pseudomonas for the biocontrol of soil-borne plant pathogens under in vitro and in vivo conditions (abstr.). In: Keel C, KollerB and De'fagoG (eds) Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria-Progress and Prospects (p. 99)

  • Campbell R (1989) Biological Control of Microbial Plant Pathogens. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Deacon JW (1991) Significance of ecology in the development of biocontrol agents against soil-borne plant pathogens. Biocontrol Science and Technology 1: 5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Dileep Kumar BS and Dube HC (1992) Seed bacterization with a fluorescent Pseudomonas for enhanced plant growth, yield and disease control. Soil Biol Biochem 24: 539–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Duczek LJ (1994) Relationship between a greenhouse and field assay for biological control of common root rot of spring wheat and barley. Canadian Plant Disease Survey 74: 135–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsherif M and Grossmann F (1991) Versuche zur biologischen Bekämpfung einiger phytopathogener Pilze durch fluoreszierende Pseudomonaden unter Anwendung verscheidener Applikationsverfahren. Z PflKrankh PflSchutz 98: 236–249

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas JR and Germida JJ (1992) Growth promotion of winter wheat by fluorescent peudomonads under field condition. Soil Biol Biochem 24: 1137–1146

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels FP and Schippers B (1983) Selection of antagonistic Pseudomonas spp. and their root colonization and persistence following treatment of seed potatoes. Phytopath Z 108: 193–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardson B, Alström S and Rämert B (1985) Plant reactions to inoculation of roots with fungi and bacteria. Phytopath Z 14: 108–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Graystone SJ, Stephens JH and Nelson LM (1991) Field and greenhouse studies on growth promotion of spring wheat inoculated with co-existent rhizobacteria. In: Keel C, Koller B and De'fago G (eds) Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria-Progress and Prospects (pp. 11–16) IOBC/WPRS Bulletin XIV

  • Hornby D, Bateman GL, Payne RW, Brown ME, Henden DR and Campbell R (1993) Field test of bacteria and soil-applied fungicides as control agents for take-all in winter wheat. Ann Appl Biol 122: 253–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Hume DJ, Scher FM, Laliberte' M and Zaleska, I (1985) Measuring the spermosphere capacity (spermosphere competence) of bacterial inoculants. Can J Microbiol 31: 926–929

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kloepper JW, Schroth MN and Miller TD (1980) Effects of rhizosphere colonization by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on potato plant development and yield. Phytopathology 70: 1078–1082

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmorgen JF (1976) Studies on biological control of bunt of wheat (Tilletia caries, Tilletia foetida). APPS Newsl, Aust Plant Pathol Soc 5: 48–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmorgen JF and Jones LC (1975) The effects of soil-borne microorganisms on the germination of chlamydospores of Tilletia caries and Tilletia foetida (Potential for the biological control of bunt). Soil Biol Biochem 7: 407–410

  • Kortemaa H, Rita H, Haahtela K and Smolander A (1994) Root colonization ability of antagonistic Streptomyces griseoviridis. Plant and Soil 163: 77–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Leyns F, Lambert B, Joos H and Swing J (1990) Antifungal bacteria from different crops. In: Hornby D (ed) Biological Control of Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens (pp. 437–444) CAB International

  • Merriman P and Russell K (1990) Screening strategies for biological control. In: Hornby D (ed) Biological Control of Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens (pp. 427–435) CAB International

  • Pierson EA and Weller DM (1994) Use of mixtures of fluorescent pseudomonads to suppress take-all and improve the growth of wheat. Phytopathology 84: 940–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey G, Burris RH and Evans HJ (eds) (1992) Biological Nitrogen Fixation. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslow TV and Schroth MN (1978) Bacterial culture preservation in methylcellulose (abstr.). Phytopathol News 12: 136

    Google Scholar 

  • Suslow TV and Schroth MN (1982) Rhizobacteria on sugar beets: Effect of seed application and root colonization on yield. Phytopathology 72: 199–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahvonen R (1982) Preliminary experiments into the use of Streptomyces spp. isolated from peat in the biological control of soil and seed-borne diseases in peat cultures. J Scient Agric Soc Finl 54: 29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyoda H, Morimoto M, Kakutani K, Morikawa M, Fukamiso T, Goto S, Terada H and Ouchi S (1993) Binary microbe system for biological control of fusarium wilt of tomato: Enhanced rootejpp487. colonization of an rhizoplan bacterium supported by a chitin-degrading bacterium. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 59: 375–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller DM and Cook RJ (1986) Increased growth of wheat by seed treatment with fluorescent pseudomonads, and implication of Pythium control. Can J Plant Pathol 8: 328–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller DM (1988) Biological control of soilborne pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Ann Rev Phytopathol 26: 379–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiehe W, Hecht-Buchholz C and Hoflich G (1994) Electron microscopic investigations on root colonization of Lupinus albus and Pisum sativum with two associative plant growth promoting rhizobacteria, Pseudomonas fluorescens and Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii. Symbiosis 17: 15–31

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hökeberg, M., Gerhardson, B. & Johnsson, L. Biological control of cereal seed-borne diseases by seed bacterization with greenhouse-selected bacteria. European Journal of Plant Pathology 103, 25–33 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008681608400

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008681608400

Navigation