Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Students' Use of Three-Dimensional Modelling While Designing and Making a Solution to a Technological Problem

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study described here investigated assumptions in the literature about how students model ideas while designing and making. Additionally, it investigated protocol analysis as a methodology for the analysis of designers' strategies. Five Year 7 dyads were video recorded while completing a design and make task. Analysis involved transcribing and segmenting the conversation between subjects and then adding to the protocols a description of their actions. Each period of action was coded and the coded transcripts analyzed.

Analysis made evident five significant differences between modelling as described in the literature and as used by subjects. First, three-dimensional modelling largely replaced two-dimensional modelling. Second, subjects developed solutions serially rather than producing several solutions at the outset. Third, three-dimensional modelling was used to manifest not only existing ideas but to fuel new ideas. Fourth, modelling was used to develop and also to refine ideas. Fifth, models were evaluated not only upon completion but from the moment that designing and making began.

These results suggest it is important to provide students, early in the process of designing and making, with an opportunity to explore, develop and communicate their design proposals by modelling ideas in three-dimensional form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anning, A.: 1993, ‘Technological Capability in Primary Classrooms’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER93: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, 36-42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausubel, D. P., Novak, J. D. & Hanesian, H.: 1978, Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View (2nd ed.), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlex, D.: 1994, ‘A Comparison Between the Nature of Modelling in Science and Design and Technology’, in F. Banks (ed.), Teaching Technology, Routledge, London, 74-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlex, D.: 1995, Nuffield Design and Technology: Teacher’s Guide, Addison Wesley Longman, Harlow, U. K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlex, E.: 1995, Design Focus in Schools, Design Council, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlex, D. M., Read, N., Fair, D. & Baker, C.: 1991, Designing Starts Here, Hodder & Stoughton, Sevenoaks, U. K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, W. R. & Gall, M. D.: 1983, Educational Research (4th ed.), Longman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breckon, A.: 1995, ‘DATA Annual Conference Address’, Design & Technology Teaching 28(1), 11-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable, H.: 1994a, ‘The Role of Drawing Within Designing and Making - a Primary Perspective’, Primary DATA: A Journal of the Design and Technology Association 3(2), 8-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constable, H.: 1994b, ‘A Study of Aspects of Design and Technology Capability at Key Stage 1 and 2’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER94: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, 9-14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N.: 1990, ‘The Nature and Nurture of Design Ability’, Design Studies 11, 127-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N.: 1994, Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product Design (2nd ed.), Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T.: 1996, ‘Modelling and Creativity in Design and Technology’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER96: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, 16-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education.: 1992, Technology for Ages 5 to 16 (1992): Proposals for the Secretary of State for Education and the Secretary of State for Wales, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education.: 1995, Design and Technology in the School Curriculum, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science.: 1987, Craft, Design and Technology from 5 to 16: Curriculum Matters 9, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A. & Simon, H. A.: 1984, Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M.: 1992, ‘Model or Prototype: Which, When and Why?’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER92: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, 42-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. & Wormald, P.: 1993, ‘The Future Role of Virtual and Physical Modelling in Industrial Design’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER93: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, 97-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H.: 1983, Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L.: 1967, The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M.: 1992, ‘Modelling in Key Stages 1 and 2’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER92: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, 32-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R.: 1989, The Complete Problem Solver (2nd ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, J. R., Flower, L., Schriver, K., Stratman, J. & Carey, L.: 1985, Cognitive Processes in Revision ( CDC Technical Report No. 12 ), Carnegie-Mellon University, Communications Design Centre, Pittsburgh, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsti, O. R.: 1969, Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, J. R. (1991). ‘An Investigation Into the Effect of Systematic Design Methods in Craft, Design and Technology (CDT)’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 1(3), 141-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsey, R.: 1995, ‘The Place of the Process Skill Making in Design and Technology: Lessons from Research into the Way Primary Children Design and Make’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER95: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, 15-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, R., Stables, K., Wheeler, T., Wosniak, A. & Kelly, V.: 1991, The Assessment of Performance in Design and Technology: Final Report, Schools Examination and Assessment Council, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddament, T.: 1993, ‘Using Models in Design and Technology Education: Some Conceptual and Pedagogic Issues’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER93: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, 15-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G.: 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K.: 1991, Children as Experimenters: Elementary Students’ Actions in an Experimental Context with Magnets. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M.: 1994, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods (2nd ed.), Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J.: 1992, ‘The Relationship Between “Modelling” and Designing and Making with Food as a Material in Design and Technology’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER92: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, 37-41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. & Simon, H. A.: 1972, Human Problem Solving, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Outterside, Y.: 1993, ‘The Emergence of Design Ability: The Early Years’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER93: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, 43-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: 1964, The Child’s Conception of the World, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahilly, T. J.: 1991, An Analysis of Three Learner-Based Formative Evaluation Conditions, Unpublished master’s thesis, McGill University, Montreal.

  • Schön, D. A.: 1987, Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. S.: 1993, ‘Modelling’, in J. S. Smith (ed.), IDATER93: International Conference on Design and Technology Educational Research and Curriculum Development, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparkes, J.: 1993, ‘Some Differences Between Science and Technology’, in R. McCormick, C. Newey & J. Sparkes (eds.), Technology for Technology Education, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, U. K., 25-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L.: 1987, Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists, Cambridge University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesch, R.: 1990, Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools, Falmer, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, M.: 1996, The Strategies Used by Ten Grade 7 Students, Working in Single-Sex Dyads, to Solve a Technological Problem, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6

    Malcolm Welch

Authors
  1. Malcolm Welch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Welch, M. Students' Use of Three-Dimensional Modelling While Designing and Making a Solution to a Technological Problem. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 8, 241–260 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008802927817

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008802927817

Search

Navigation