Abstract
This paper reflects on the outcomes of teacher professional development programmes in technology education. These programmes were based on a model which emphasised the importance of teachers developing an understanding of both technological practice and technology education. Two different programmes have been developed and trialed in the New Zealand context. They are the Facilitator Training programme, and the Technology Teacher Development Resource Package programme. This paper will focus on the outcomes of these programmes. The Facilitator Training programme was a year long programme, and ran in 1995 and 1996. It involved training a total of 30 educators – 15 each year, from all over New Zealand. The Resource Package was trialed in 14 schools over a 3–6 month period in 1996. The evaluations indicate the successful nature of these programmes and the usefulness of the model as a basis for the development of teacher professional development in technology education.
The programmes reported on in this paper were developed and evaluated as part of two New Zealand Ministry of Education contracts held by the Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bell, B. & Gilbert, J.: 1995, Teacher Development: A model from Science Education, Falmer Press, Lewes.
Dalin, P.: 1978, Limits to Educational Change, Macmillan Press, London.
Fullan, M. G. & Stiegelbauer, S.: 1991, The New Meaning of Education Change, Teachers’ College, New York.
Gilbert, J.: 1994, ‘The Construction and Reconstruction of the Concept of the Reflective Practitioner in the Discourses of Teacher Professional Development’, International Journal of Science Education 16(5), 511-522.
Goodson, I. F.: 1985, ‘Subjects for Study’, in I. F. Goodson (ed.), Social Histories of the Secondary Curriculum, Falmer Press, Lewes.
Jones, A. & Simon, S.: 1991, Strategies for Educational Change: The Work of the OPENS Project in the Context of a New National Curriculum for Science SAME Papers, Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato, Hamilton, 15-35.
Jones, A., Mather, V. & Carr, M. D.: 1995, Issues in the Practice of Technology Education. Final report of the Learning in Technology Education Project. Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato. Hamilton.
Jones, A. & Mather, V.: 1995, Towards a Model of Teacher Development in Technology Education. Paper presented to the Australasian Science Education Research Association Conference. Bendigo, July.
Lave, J.: 1991, ‘Situated Learning in Communities of Practice’, in Resnick L. B., J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (eds.), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition,American Psychological Association, Washington.
Ministry of Education: 1995, Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum, Learning Media, Wellington.
Ministry of Education: 1997, Towards Teaching Technology: Know How Two, Learning Media, Wellington.
Paechter, C.: 1991, Subcultural Retreat: Negotiating the Design and Technology Curriculum. Paper presented to the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference 1991.
Shulman, L. S.: 1987, ‘Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform’, Harvard Educational Review 57(1), 1-22.
Van den Akker, J.: 1988, ‘The Teacher as Learner in Curriculum Implementation’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 20(1), 47-55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Compton, V., Jones, A. Reflecting on Teacher Development in Technology Education: Implications for Future Programmes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 8, 151–166 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008808327436
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008808327436