Skip to main content
Log in

Schumpeterian Growth Without Scale Effects

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We incorporate population growth into the model of trustified capitalism, with vertical and horizontal product differentiation, developed by Thompson and Waldo (1994) and generate endogenous long-run Schumpeterian growth without scale effects. Our model extends the analysis of Young (1998) and overturns some key policy and welfare implications of his model. The transitional dynamics of the model can account for the presence of scale effects in preindustrial and early industrial eras.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, P., and P. Howitt. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armknecht, P. A., W. F. Lane, and K. J. Stewart. (1997). “New Products and the U.S. Consumer Price Index.” In Timothy F. Bresnahan and Robert J. Gordon (eds.), The Economics of New Goods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessen, J. (1998). “The Adoption Costs of Research and Development.” Working paper, Research on Innovation.

  • Bureau of the Census. (1976). Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinopoulos, E., and P. Thompson. (1997). “R&D-Based Long-Run Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries.” Working Paper No. 96?97?11, University of Florida, November.

  • Dinopoulos, E., and P. Thompson. (1998). “Scale Effects in Neo-Schumpeterian Models of Economic Growth.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, forthcoming.

  • Dixit, A., and J. E. Stiglitz. (1997). “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity.” American Economic Review 67, 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1994). “Productivity, R&D, and the Data Constraint.” American Economic Review 84, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. (1997). “TheValuation of NewGoods Under Perfect and Imperfect Competition.” In Timothy F. Bresnahan and Robert J. Gordon (eds.), The Economics of New Goods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopenhayn, H. (1992). “Entry, Exit, and Firm Dynamics in Long-Run Equilibrium.” Econometrica 60, 1127–1150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howitt, P. (1997). “Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R&D Inputs Growing.” Mimeo, Ohio State University.

  • Jones, C. I. (1995a). “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth.” Journal of Political Economy 103, 759–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (1995b). “Time-Series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 495–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. (1997). “The Upcoming Slowdown in U.S. Economic Growth.” Mimeo, Stanford University.

  • Kortum, S. (1997). “Research, Patenting, and Technological Change.” Econometrica 65, 1389–1419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortum, S., and J. Lerner. (1997). “Stronger Protection or Technological Revolution: What Is Behind the Recent Surge in Patenting?” NBER Working Paper No. 6204.

  • Kremer, M. I. (1993). “Population Growth and Technological Change: One Million B.C. to 1990.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 681–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1979). “Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition, and International Trade.” Journal of International Economics 9, 469–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R., and D. Renelt. (1992). “A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions.” American Economic Review 82, 942–963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison, A. (1991). Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N. G., D. Romer, and D. N. Weil. (1992). “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 407–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., J. Rapoport, J. Schnee, and M. Hamburger. (1971). Research and Innovation in the Modern Corporation. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, C. B., and X. Sala-i-Martin. (1992). “Transition Dynamics in Two-Sector Models of Endogenous Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 739–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peretto, P. (1996). “Technological Change and Population Growth.” Journal of Economic Growth 3, 283–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1990). “Endogenous Technical Change.” Journal of Political Economy 98, S71–S102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P.M. (1996). “Why, Indeed, in America? Theory, History, and the Origins of Modern Economic Growth.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 86, 202–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruffin, R. J. (1994). “Endogenous Growth and International Trade.” Review of International Economics 2, 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerstrom, P. S. (1998). “Endogenous Growth Without Scale Effects.” American Economic Review. Forthcoming.

  • Thompson, P. (1998). “Rationality, Rules of Thumb, and R&D.” Mimeo, University of Houston.

  • Thompson, P., and D. Waldo. (1994). “Growth and Trustified Captialism.” Journal of Monetary Economics 34, 445–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P., and D. Waldo. (1997). “Product Versus Process Innovation: Do Consumption Data Contain Any Information?” Mimeo, University of Houston.

  • Young, A. (1998). “Growth Without Scale Effects.” Journal of Political Economy 106, 41–63

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dinopoulos, E., Thompson, P. Schumpeterian Growth Without Scale Effects. Journal of Economic Growth 3, 313–335 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009711822294

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009711822294

Navigation