Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper studies cross-country patterns of economicgrowth from the viewpoint of income distribution dynamics. Sucha perspective raises new empirical and theoretical issues ingrowth analysis: the profound empirical regularity is an “emergingtwin peaks” in the cross-sectional distribution, not simplepatterns of convergence or divergence. The theoretical problemsraised concern interaction patterns among subgroups of economies,not only problems of a single economy's accumulating factor inputsand technology for growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson, A. B.(1995). Incomes and the Welfare State: Essays on Britain and Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J., and X. Sala-i-Martin. (1995). Economic Growth. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1986). “Productivity Growth, Convergence, and Welfare,” American Economic Review76, 1072–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, D. (1994). “Convergence Clubs and Diverging Economies,” Working Paper 922, CEPR.

  • Bénabou, R. (1996a). “Heterogeneity, Stratification, and Growth: Macroeconomic Implications of Community Structure and School Finance,” American Economic Review86, 584–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bénabou, R. (1996b). “Inequality and Growth.” In Macroeconomics Annual, Ben Bernanke and Julio Rotemberg (eds.), Cambridge, MA: NBER and MIT Press. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A. B., and S. N. Durlauf. (1996). “Interpreting Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis,” Journal of Econometrics71, 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, M. (1995). “Testing of Convergence: A Bootstrap Test for Multimodality,” Working Paper, Bank of England.

  • Bliss, C. J. (1996). “Long-run Wealth Distribution with Random Shocks,” Working Paper 23, Oxford: Nuffield College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. A., and S. N. Durlauf. (1995). “Discrete Choice with Social Interactions,” Working Paper, Madison: University of Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canova, F., and A. Marcet. (1995). “The Poor Stay Poor: Nonconvergence Across Countries and Regions,” Discussion Paper 1265, CEPR, November.

  • Chamberlain, G. (1984). “Panel Data.” In Zvi Griliches and Michael D. Intriligator (eds.), Handbook of Econometrics vol. II. Amsterdam: Elsevier North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, K. L. (1960). Markov Chains with Stationary Transition Probabilities. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland, W. S. (1993). Visualizing Data. Summit, NJ: Hobart Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, D. T., and E. Helpman. (1995). “International R&D Spillovers,” European Economic Review39, 859–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, F. A., S. P. Jenkins, and J. A. Litchfield. (1996). “The Changing Shape of the UK Income Distribution: Kernel Density Estimates.” In John Hills (ed.), New Inequalities: The Changing Distribution of Income and Wealth in the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desdoigts, A. (1994). “Changes in theWorld Income Distribution: A Non-parametric Approach to Challenge the Neoclassical Convergence Argument,” PhD dissertation, Florence: European University Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desdoigts, A. (1996). “Determining Development Patterns and “Club” Formation Using Projection Pursuit Techniques,” Working Paper, ECARE, ULB.

  • Durlauf, S. N. (1993). “Nonergodic Economic Growth,” Review of Economic Studies60, 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N. (1996). “A Theory of Persistent Income Inequality,” Journal of Economic Growth1, 75–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlauf, S. N., and P. Johnson. (1994). “Nonlinearities in Intergenerational Income Mobility,” Working Paper, University of Wisconsin, Economics Department.

  • Durlauf, S. (1995). “Multiple Regimes and Cross-country Growth Behavior,” Journal of Applied Econometrics 10, 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., and S. Kortum. (1996). “Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD,” Journal of International Economics40, 251–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteban, J.-M., and D. Ray. (1994). “On the Measurement of Polarization,” Econometrica62, 819–851.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1992). “Do Old Fallacies Ever Die?” Journal of Economic Literature30, 2129–2132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O. (1996). “Convergence? Inferences from Theoretical Models,” Economic Journal106, 1056–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor, O., and J. Zeira. (1993). “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics,” Review of Economic Studies60, 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, Y. M. (1990). “Trading Uncertainty and Market Form,” International Economic Review31, 619–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, Y. M. (1996). “Residential Neighborhood Effects and Inequality,” Working Paper, Economics Department, Tufts University.

  • Islam, N. (1995). “Growth Empirics: A Panel Data Approach,” Quarterly Journal of Economics110, 1127–1170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izenman, A. J., and C. J. Sommer. (1988). “Philatelic mixtures and multimodal densities,” Journal of the American Statistical Association83, 941–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. I. “On the Evolution of the World Income Distribution,” Journal of Economic Perspectives. Forthcoming.

  • Kirman, A. P., C. Oddou, and S. Weber. (1986). “Stochastic Communication and Coalition Formation,” Econometrica 54, 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konings, J. (1994). “Gross Job Flows and Wage Determination in the UK: Evidence from Firm-level Data,” PhD dissertation, LSE.

  • Koopmans, R. M. (1995). “Asymmetric Industry Structures: Multiple Technologies, Firm Dynamics, and Profitability,” PhD dissertation, LSE.

  • Lamo, A. R. (1996). “Cross-section Distribution Dynamics,” PhD dissertation, LSE.

  • Leung, C., and D. T. Quah. (1996). “Convergence, Endogenous Growth, and Productivity Disturbances,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 38, 535–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillard, L. A., and R. J. Willis. (1978). “Dynamic Aspects of Earning Mobility,” Econometrica46, 985–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loury, G. C. (1981). “Intergenerational Transfers and the Distribution of Earnings,” Econometrica49, 843–867.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., Jr., (1978). “On the Size Distribution of Business Firms,” Rand Journal of Economics9, 508–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove, M. (1996). “Growth Rate Convergence: Fact of Artifact?” Working Paper, University of Maryland.

  • Paap, R., and H. K. van Dijk. (1994). “Distribution and Mobility of Wealth of Nations,” Working Paper, Tinbergen Institute, Erasmus University.

  • Persson, T., and G. Tabellini. (1994). “Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?” American Economic Review84, 600–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. T. (1993a). “Empirical Cross-section Dynamics in Economic Growth,” European Economic Review37, 426–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. T. (1993b). “Galton's Fallacy and Tests of the Convergence Hypothesis,” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics95, 427–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. T. (1996a). “Aggregate and Regional Disaggregate Fluctuations,” Empirical Economics21, 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. T. (1996b). “Convergence Empirics Across Economies with (Some) Capital Mobility,” Journal of Economic Growth1, 95–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. T. (1996c). “Empirics for Economic Growth and Convergence,” European Economic Review40, 1353–1375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. T. (1996d).“Ideas Determining Convergence Clubs,” Working Paper, Economics Department, LSE.

  • Quah, D. T. (1996e). “Regional Convergence Clusters Across Europe,” European Economic Review40, 951–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quah, D. T. (1996f). “Twin Peaks: Growth and Convergence in Models of Distribution Dynamics,” Economic Journal106, 1045–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin, X. (1996). “Regional Cohesion: Evidence and Theories of Regional Growth and Convergence,” European Economic Review40, 1325–1352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schluter, C. (1997). “Topics in Distributional Analysis,” PhD dissertation, LSE.

  • Shorrocks, A. F. (1978). “The Measurement of Mobility,” Econometrica46, 1013–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. W. (1981). “Using Kernel Density Estimates to Investigate Multimodality,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B43, 97–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B. W. (1983). “Some Properties of a Test for Multimodality Based on Kernel Density Estimates.” In J. F. C. Kingman and G. E. H. Reuter, (eds.), Probability, Statistics, and Analysis. vol. 79. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note SeriesCambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, B.W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, B., and S. Spilerman. (1976). “Some Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Longitudinal Surveys,” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement5, 447–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R., and A. Heston. (1991). “The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950–1988,” Quarterly Journal of Economics106, 327–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. (1995). “The Size Distribution of Business, Parts I and II,” Discussion Paper EI/9, 10, STICERD, LSE.

  • Townsend, R. M. (1983). “Theories of Intermediated Structures,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy18, 221–272.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. London School of Economics, UK

    Danny T. Quah

Authors
  1. Danny T. Quah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quah, D.T. Empirics for Growth and Distribution: Stratification, Polarization, and Convergence Clubs. Journal of Economic Growth 2, 27–59 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009781613339

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009781613339

Search

Navigation