Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity Analysis of Rigid-Flexible Multibody Systems

  • Published:
Multibody System Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An important step in the application of automated design techniques to rigid-flexible multibody systems is the calculation of the sensitivities with respect to design variables. Thispaper presents a general formulation for thecalculation of the first order analytical designsensitivities based on the direct differentiationmethod. The analytical sensitivities are comparedwith the numerical results obtained by the finitedifferences method and the accuracy and validity ofboth methods is discussed. Cartesian co-ordinates areused for the dynamic analysis of rigid-flexiblemultibody systems. To reduce the number ofco-ordinates associated with the flexible bodies, thecomponent mode synthesis method is used. Theequations of the sensitivities are obtainedsymbolically and integrated in time simultaneouslywith the dynamic equations. Examples of 2Dsensitivity analysis of the transient response of aslider-crank and of a vehicle with a flexible chassisare presented, and the accuracy and characteristics ofthe sensitivities are analyzed and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haftka, R.T. and Gürdal, Z., Elements of Structural Optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chang, C.O., ‘Dynamic analysis and optimal design of mechanical systems with constraint violation stabilizationmethod’, Ph.D. Thesis,Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Iowa, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haug, E.J., Mani, N.H. and Krishnaswami, P., ‘Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of dynamically driven systems’, in Computer Aided Analysis and Optimization of Mechanical System Dynamics, E.J. Haug (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1984, 555–636.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ashrafiuon, H. and Mani, N.K., ‘Analysis and optimal design of spatial mechanical systems’, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 112, 1990, 200–207.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tak, T. and Kim, S.S., ‘Design sensitivity of multibody dynamic systems’, Technical Report No. R-88, The University of Iowa, 1990.

  6. Cao, Q. and Krishnaswami, P., ‘Computational efficiency of first and second order sensitivity analysis methods for dynamic systems,’ Advances in Design Automation ASMEDE-65-2, 1993, 113–117.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bestle, D. and Eberhard, P., ‘Analyzing and optimizing multibody systems’, Mechanics of Structures and Machines 20, 1992, 67–92.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Haug, E.J., ‘Design sensitivity analysis of dynamic systems’, in Computer Aided Optimal Design: Structural and Mechanical Systems, C.A. Mota Soares (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1987, 705–756.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Adelman, H.M. and Haftka, R.T., ‘Sensitivity analysis of discrete structural systems’, AIAA Journal 25, 1986, 823–832.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haftka, R.T. and Adelman, H.M., ‘Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis’, Structural Optimization 1, 1989, 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dias, J.P. and Pereira, M.S., ‘Dynamics of flexible mechanical systems with contact-impact and plastic deformations’, Nonlinear Dynamics 8, 1995, 491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shabana, A.A. and Wehage, R.A., ‘Variable degree-of-freedom component mode analysis of inertia variant flexible mechanical systems,’ Technical Report No. 81-12, The University of Iowa, 1982.

  13. Shabana, A.A., Dynamics of Multibody Systems, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Greene, W.H. and Haftka, R.T., ‘Computational aspects of sensitivity calculations in transient structural analysis’, Computers & Structures 32, 1989, 433–443.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Char, B.W., Maple V: Library Reference Manual, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lund, E. and Olhoff, N., ‘Shape design sensitivity analysis of eigenvalues using ‘exact’ numerical differentiation of finite element matrices’, Structural Optimization 8, 1994, 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shampine, L.F. and Gordon, M.K., Computer Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations, Prentice Hall, NJ, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Meijaard, J.P., ‘Validation of flexible beam elements in dynamics programs’,NonlinearDynamics 9, 1996, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kim, H.K. and Park, Y., ‘Dynamic analysis of a flexible vehicle structure with nonlinear force elements using substructure technique’, Mechanics of Structures and Machines 21, 1993, 399–428.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, S.S., Shabana, A.A. and Haug, E.J., ‘Automated vehicle dynamic analysis with flexible components’, ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 106, 1984, 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rao, S.S., Mechanical Vibrations, 2nd ed., Addison Wesley, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kapania, R.K. and Park, S., ‘Nonlinear transient response and its sensitivity using finite elements in time’, Computational Mechanics 17, 1996, 306–317.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dias, J., Pereira, M. Sensitivity Analysis of Rigid-Flexible Multibody Systems. Multibody System Dynamics 1, 303–322 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009790202712

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009790202712

Navigation