Skip to main content
Log in

Looking For a Network Organization: The Case of GESTO

  • Published:
Journal of Market-Focused Management

Abstract

We present ten propositions to explore an ideal type of network organizations with emphasis on internal structure relating properties to organizational structure and processes. Network organizations are flat, flexible structures, with high reachability and high information access enabling learning. Based on an exploratory case study we use network analysis and find that this organization has the properties of a network organization. The employees participate in several networks, work is done in project groups that are initiated and organized by the employees. Oligarchy or hierarchy are not distinct features of the organization; the flexibility of the structures is demonstrated by showing that the members change network position in project networks over time. Tenure, the most important integrating mechanism, influences centrality measures, skill levels, and the ability to propose and organize projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Thomas J. (1977), Managing the Flow of Technology, Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, James C., Håkansson, Håkan, and Johanson, Jan (1994), “Dyadic Business Relationships Within a Business Network Context,” Journal of Marketing, 58(4), pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Wayne E. (1992), “The Network Organization in Theory and Practice,” in (Nohria, Nitin and Eccles, Robert G., eds.) Networks and Organizations, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 397–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benassi, Mario, and Greve, Arent (1996), “GESTO–A Network Organized Company?” Journal of Market Focused Management, 1, pp. 301–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemans, Wim G. (1996), “Organizational Networks: Toward a Cross-Fertilization Between Practice and Theory,” Journal of Business Research, 35(1), pp. 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, Everett, and Freeman (1994), UCINET IV. Version 1.40/X, Colombia: Analytic Technologies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovasso, Gregory (1992), “A Structural Analysis of the Formation of a Network Organization,” Group and Organization Management, 17(1), pp. 86–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Emily (1993), “Managing Organizational Networks: Defining the Core,” Management Decision, 31(7), pp. 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradach, Jeffrey L., and Eccles, Robert G. (1989), “Markets vs. Hierarchies: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms,” Annual Review of Sociology, 15, pp. 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Tom, and Stalker, George M. (1961), The Management of Innovation, London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S., and Talmud, Ilan (1993), “Market Niche,” Social Networks, 15, pp. 133–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, John B., Jr., and Frohman, Alan L. (1991), “Communication in a ‘Network’ Organization,” Organizational Dynamics, 20(2), pp. 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, David W., Piercy, Nigel F., and Shipp, Shannon H. (1996), “New Organizational Forms for Competing in Highly Dynamic Environments: The Network Paradigm,” British Journal of Management, 7(3), pp. 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, Richard M., and March, James G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dow, Gregory K. (1990), “The Organization as an Adaptive Network,” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 14(2), pp. 159–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, Robert, and Crane, Dwight (1988), Doing Deals: Investment Banks at Work, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, Katherine, and Wasserman, Stanley (1992), “Blockmodels: Interpretation and Evaluation,” Social Networks, 14, pp. 5–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faust, Katherine (1988), “Comparison of Methods for Positional Analysis: Structural and General Equivalences,” Social Networks, 10, pp. 313–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Martha S., and March, James G. (1981), “Information in Organizations as Signal and Symbol,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, pp. 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Linton C. (1979), “Centrality in Social Networks: I. Conceptual Clarification,” Social Networks, 1, pp. 215–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, Anna, and Soda, Giuseppe (1995), “Inter-firm Networks: Antecedents, Mechanisms and Forms,” Organization Studies, 16(2), pp. 183–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, Arent (1992), Turnover and Career Mobility, Bergen: Alma Mater.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, Arent, and Harkola, Julia (1996), “Social Networks and the Development of Two Oil Technologies in Norway,” paper presented at IECM’ 96, International Engineering Management Conference: Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence of Communications, Computing, and Energy Technologies, Aug. 18-20, 1996, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Proceedings: pp. 180–184.

  • Hanssen-Bauer, Jon, and Snow, Charles C. (1996), “Responding to Hypercompetition: The Structure and Processes of a Regional Learning Network Organization,” Organization Science, 7(4), pp. 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, Gunnar, and Ridderstråle, Jonas (1995), “International Development Projects: Key to Competitiveness, Impossible, or Mismanaged?” International Studies of Management & Organization, 25(1,2), pp. 158–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, Håkan (1989), Corporate Technological Behaviour, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, Herminia (1992), “Structural Alignments, Individual Strategies, and Managerial Action: Elements Toward a Network Theory of Getting Things Done,” in (Nohria, Nitin and Eccles, Robert G., eds.) Networks and Organizations, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 165–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johanson, Jan, and Mattsson, Lars-Gunnar (1987), “Interorganizational Relations in Industrial Systems: A Network Approach Compared with the Transaction-Cost Approach,” International Studies of Management & Organization, 17(1), pp. 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadushin, Charles (1990), Why Network Fails. Double Bind and the Limitation of the Shadow Network, Paper Presented at the 10th Sunbelt Conference.

  • Krackhardt, David (1994), “Constraints on the Interactive Organization as an Ideal Type,” in (Heckscher, C. and Donnellon, A., eds.) The Post-bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 211–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, David (1990), “Assessing the Political Landscape: Structure, Cognition, and Power in Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), pp. 342–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krackhardt, David, and Hanson, Jeffrey R. (1993), “Informal Networks: The Company Behind the Chart,” Harvard Business Review, 71(4), pp. 104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreiner, Kristian, and Schultz, Majken (1993), “Informal Collaboration in R & D. The Formation of Networks Across Organizations,” Organization Studies, 14(2), pp. 189–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, Martin, O'hea, Tim, and Fung, Pat (1995), “Constructing the Networked Organization: Content and Context in the Development of Electronic Communications,” Organization Science, 6(4), pp. 462–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorrain, Francois, and White, Harrison C. (1971), “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, pp. 49–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Raymond E., and Snow, Charles C. (1992), “Causes of Failure in Network Organizations,” California Management Review, 34(4), pp. 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Raymond E., and Snow, Charles C. (1986) “Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms,” California Management Review, 28(3), pp. 62–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monge, Peter, and Contractor, Noshir S. (1997), “Emergence of Communication Networks.” A chapter prepared for publication in (Jablin, F. M. and Putnam, L. L., eds.) Handbook of Organizational Communication, 2nd ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohria, Nitin, and Eccles, Robert (1992), “Face-to-face: Making Network Organizations Work,” in (Nohria, Nitin and Eccles, Robert G., eds.) Networks and Organizations, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 288–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey (1991), “Organization Theory and Structural Perspectives on Management,” Journal of Management, 17, pp. 789–803.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey (1983), “Organizational Demography,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, pp. 299–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, Nigel F., and Cravens, David W. (1995), “The Network Paradigm and the Marketing Organization: Developing a New Management Agenda,” European Journal of Marketing, 29(3), pp. 7–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W. (1990), “Neither Market Nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, pp. 295–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, Ronald E. (1994), “Network Analysis and Computer Mediated Technology,” in (Wasserman, S. and Galaskiewicz, J., eds.) Advances in Social Network Analysis, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader, Charles B., Lincoln, James R., and Hoffman, Alan N. (1989), “The Network Structures of Organizations: Effects of Task Contingencies and Distributional Form,” Human Relations, 42(1), pp. 43–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, Charles C., Miles, Raymond E., and Coleman, Henry J. Jr. (1992), “Managing 21st Century Network Organizations,” Organizational Dynamics, 20(3), pp. 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, Karen, and Zelen, Marvin (1989), “Rethinking Centrality: Methods and Applications,” Social Networks, 11, pp. 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewman, Shelby (1986), “Demographic Models of Internal Labor Markets,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, pp. 212–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewman, Shelby, and Konda, Suresh L. (1983), “Careers and Organizational Labor Markets: Demographic Models of Organizational Behavior,” American Journal of Sociology, 88, pp. 637–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorelli, Hans B. (1986), “Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies,” Strategic Management Journal, 7(1), pp. 37–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, Noel M., Tushman, Michael L., and Fombrun, Charles (1979), “Social Network Analysis for Organizations,” Academy of Management Review, 4, pp. 507–519.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Barry (1976), “The Organizational and Interorganizational Development of Disaster,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, pp. 378–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, Stanley, and Faust, Katherine (1994), Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1947), From MaxWeber: Essays in Sociology, Hans H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. (1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. (1995), Sensemaking in Organizations, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benassi, M., Greve, A. & Harkola, J. Looking For a Network Organization: The Case of GESTO. Journal of Market-Focused Management 4, 205–229 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009875019259

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009875019259

Navigation