Skip to main content
Log in

Mathematics Teacher Research: Process, Practice and the Development of Teaching

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses a study of teacher researchers undertaking research into self-chosen aspects of their own mathematics teaching at the secondary level. The study used qualitative methods to explore the processes and practices of this research and the issues which it raised. Emergent theory of teachers' research activity fitted strongly with a view of action research relating to critical reflective practice. The teachers were seen as reflective practitioners, developing knowledge and awareness through enhanced metacognitive activity. Their research was characterised as evolutionary, in contrast with established patterns of action research. Despite differences in the substance of each teacher's research there were commonalities which provide insights into the conducting of research by teachers and its potential for the development of mathematics teaching. The special nature of mathematics in this research, and the role of external researchers in the project, were important considerations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altricher, H., Posch, P. & Somekh, B. (1993). Teachers investigate their work: an introduction to the methods of action research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S. (1994). Rethinking the principles and practice of action research: The tensions for the teacher-researcher. Educational Action Research, 2(3), 383–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association of Teachers of Mathematics (1987). Teacher is (as) researcher. UK: Derby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J. (1990). Self doubt and soft data: Social and technical trajectories in ethnographic fieldwork. Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(2), 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Britt, M.S., Irwin, K.C., Ellis, J. & Ritchie, G. (1993). Teachers raising achievement in mathematics: Final report to the Ministry of Education. Auckland, NZ: Centre for Mathematics Education, Auckland College of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. & McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R.G. (1985). Strategies of educational research. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, L. (1996). The implications of a narrative approach to the learning of mathematics. Paper presented at the symposium Learning Mathematics from Hierarchies to Networks at the conference The Growing Mind, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Calderhead, J. (1987). Exploring teachers' thinking. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Yackel, E. & Wood, T. (1992). Interaction and learning in mathematics classroom situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R.B., Maher, C.A. & Noddings, N. (Eds.). (1990). Constructivist views on the learning and teaching of mathematics. Journal for research in mathematics education, monograph number 4. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

  • Delamont, S. & Hamilton, D. (1984). Revisiting classroom research: A cautionary tale. In S. Delamont (Ed.), Readings on interaction in the classroom (3–24). London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. London: D.C. Heath and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. (in press). Research into raising self-esteem in low attainers. Mathematics Teaching, 161.

  • Elbaz, F. (1987). Teachers' knowledge of teaching: Strategies for reflection. In J. Smyth (Ed.), Educating teachers. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, J. & Adelman, C. (1975). The language and logic of informal teaching. In The Ford teaching project, Unit 1, patterns of teaching. Norwich, UK: University of East Anglia, Centre for Applied Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (1995). Schön shock: A case for reframing reflection-in-action? Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 1(1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (1997). Some investigations about mathematical talk. Mathematics Teaching, 159.

  • Hammersley, M. (1990). Classroom ethnography. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, T., Hanley, U. & Brown, T. (1994). Inquiring into the mathematics classroom: Working with the noticings paradigm as a way of researching the mathematics classroom. In P. Gates (Ed.), Proceedings of the joint conference of the British Society for Research in Learning Mathematics [BSRLM] and the Association of Mathematics Education Teachers [AMET] (46–52). Northampton, UK.

  • Hargreaves, D. (1996). Teaching as a research-based profession: Possibilities and prospects. Teacher training agency annual lecture. London: Teacher Training Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. (1994). Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. (1996). A study of teacher enquiry into the processes of mathematics teaching. In L. Puig & A. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th annual conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics teaching, Vol. 3 (129–136). Valencia, Spain: Universitat de Valencia, Departament de Didáctica de la Matemática.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. (in press). The centrality of the researcher: Rigour in a constructivist enquiry into mathematics teaching. In A. Teppo (Ed.), Qualitative research methods in mathematics education. JRME monograph. Reston, VA: NCTM.

  • Jaworski, B. & Lee, C. (1994, December). Studying the process of teacher research in the development of mathematics teaching. In P. Gates (Ed.), Proceedings of the day conference of the British Society for Research in Learning Mathematics (57–67). London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemmis, S. (1985). Action research and the politics of reflection. In D. Boud, R. Keogh & D. Walker (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krainer, K. (1993). Understanding students' understanding: On the importance of co-operation between teachers and researchers. In P. Boero (Ed.), Proceedings of the 3 rd Bratislava international symposium on mathematical teacher education. Bratislava, Slovakia: Comenius University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1990). Reflections on dialogue between theory and practice, reconciled by awareness. In F Seeger & H. Steinbring (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth conference on the systematic cooperation between theory and practice in mathematics education: Overcoming the broadcast metaphor (1–11). Institut für Didaktik der Mathematik der Universität Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld/IDM.

  • McNiff, J. (1988). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolder, R. & Tytherleigh, B. (1990). R2MC: A springboard to curriculum change. British Journal of Inservice Education, 16(1), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Povey, H. (1995).Ways of knowing of student and beginning mathematics teaching. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. London: Temple Smith.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Oxford, UK: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierpinska, A. (1994). Understanding in mathematics. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, M. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skemp, R.R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77.

  • Slavin, R.E. (1983). Cooperative learning. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R.E. (1989). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L.P. & D'Ambrosio, B. (1995). Towards a working model of constructivist teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 146–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1984). Evaluating curriculum evaluation. In C. Adelman (Ed.), The politics and ethics of evaluation. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vulliamy, G. & Webb, R. (1992). The influence of teacher research: Process or product? Educational Review, 44(1), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, T. (1997). Maintaining a context for argumentation: The challenge of teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Zack, V., Mousely, J. & Breen, C. (Eds.) (1997). Developing practice: Teachers' inquiry and educational change in classrooms. Geelong, Australia: Centre for Studies in Mathematics, Science and Environmental Education, Deakin University. ?? ??

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jaworski, B. Mathematics Teacher Research: Process, Practice and the Development of Teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 1, 3–31 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009903013682

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009903013682

Keywords

Navigation