Skip to main content
Log in

Virtue Ethics and Situationist Personality Psychology

  • Published:
Ethical Theory and Moral Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I examine and reply to a deflationary challenge brought against virtue ethics. The challenge comes from critics who are impressed by recent psychological evidence suggesting that much of what we take to be virtuous conduct is in fact elicited by narrowly specific social settings, as opposed to being the manifestation of robust individual character. In answer to the challenge, I suggest a conception of virtue that openly acknowledges the likelihood of its deep, ongoing dependence upon particular social relationships and settings. I argue that holding this conception will indeed cause problems for some important strands of thought in virtue ethics, most notably in the tradition of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. But an approach to virtue ethics modeled on David Hume's treatment of virtue and character in A Treatise of Human Nature promises to escape these problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Annas, J., Virtue and Eudaimonism, Social Philosophy and Policy 15(1) (1998), pp. 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, tr. David Ross, revised by J.L. Ackrill and J.O. Urmson. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badhwar, N.K., The Limited Unity of Virtue, Nous 30(3) (1996), pp. 306–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, N., and Kihlstrom, J.F., Personality and Social Intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall. Prentice Hall, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp, R., Modern Moral Philosophy and the Virtues, in R. Crisp (ed.), How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J.M., and Batson, C.D., From Jerusalem to Jericho: A Study of Situational and Dispositional Variables in Helping Behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27(1) (1973), pp. 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doris, J.M., Persons, Situations, and Virtue Ethics, Nous 32 (1998), pp. 504–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, J., The Virtues and Human Nature, in R. Crisp (ed.) How Should One Live? Essays on the Virtues. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 111–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O., Varieties of Moral Personality: Ethics and Psychological Realism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G., Moral Philosophy Meets Social Psychology: Virtue Ethics and the Fundamental Attribution Error, in Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society 99 (1998-99), pp. 315–331.

  • Hume, D., in L.A. Selby-Bigge (ed.), A Treatise of Human Nature, 1739-40, 2nd Ed. revised by P.H. Nidditch. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A.M. and Levin, H., Effect of Feeling Good on Helping: Cookies and Kindness, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 21(3) (1972), pp. 384–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. and Shoda, Y., A Cognitive-Affective System Theory of Personality: Reconceptualizing the Invariances in Personality and the Role of Situations, Psychological Review 102(2) (1995), pp. 246–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, L. and Nisbett, R., The Person and the Situation: perspectives of social psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre-McCord, G., Hume and the Bauhaus Theory of Ethics, in P.A. French, T.E. Uehling and H.K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. XX. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996, pp. 280–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, M., The Schizophrenia of Modern Moral Theories, Journal of Philosophy 73 (1976), pp. 453–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.A.O., A Critique of Utilitarianism, in J.J.C. Smart and B.A.O. Williams (eds), Utilitarianism: For and Against. London; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.A.O., Virtues and Vices, in E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London; New York: Routledge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre-McCord, G., Hume and the Bauhaus Theory of Ethics, in P.A. French, T.E. Uehling and H.K. Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. XX. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1996, pp. 280–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocker, M., The Schizophrenia of Modern Moral Theories, Journal of Philosophy 73 (1976), pp. 453–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.A.O., A Critique of Utilitarianism, in J.J.C. Smart and B.A.O. Williams (eds), Utilitarianism: For and Against. London; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B.A.O., Virtues and Vices, in E. Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. London; New York: Routledge, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merritt, M. Virtue Ethics and Situationist Personality Psychology. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3, 365–383 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009926720584

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009926720584

Navigation