Skip to main content
Log in

Footprints for Sustainability: The Next Steps

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of an ecological footprint is based on the understanding that every individual human appropriates a share of the productive and assimilative capacity of the biosphere. An ecological footprint corresponds to this exclusive biologically productive area that a defined population uses for all its resource requirements and wastes, and is expressed in terms of bioproductive space, with world-average productivity. Humanity's footprint or its aggregate ecological demand can only temporarily exceed the productive and assimilative capacity of the biosphere without liquidating and weakening the natural capital on which humanity depends fundamentally. Therefore, accounting tools for quantifying humanity's use of nature are essential for overall assessments of human impact as well as for planning specific steps towards a sustainable future.

This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the ecological footprint as an ecological accounting method, points out research needs for improvement of the analysis, and suggests potential new applications. The paper identifies ten new applications of the tool to make it applicable at various geographic scales and for a number of analytical and didactic purposes. Then nine methodological improvements are suggested that could refine the currently applied method, making assessments more sensitive to a larger number of ecological impacts. It concludes that many crucial questions pertinent to building a sustainable society can be addressed by current ecological footprint research. By making the method more complete, this tool could evolve from being largely of pedagogical use to become a strategic tool for policy analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel, S., Braunschweig, A. and Müller-Wenk, R.: 1990, Methodik für Ökobilanzen auf der Basis ökologischer Optimierung (Methodology for life cycle analysis based on ecological optimization), Schriftenreihe Umwelt, 133, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abernethy, V.: 1996, Population theory and future population size, Environmental Pollution ICEP 3, 16-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, W.: 1998, Fatal daughter syndrome, California Polytechnic State University, Santa Rosa, submitted contribution to Rosemarie Tong (ed.), Globalizing and Feminizing Bioethics: Women's Health in the New Millennium(in preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, W.M.: 2000, Normal Kerala within abnormal India: reflections on gender and sustainability, in G. Parayil (ed.), The Kerala Experience: Perspectives on Sustainability and Replicability, London, Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R. and Simmonis, U. (eds): 1995, Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for SD, Tokyo and New York, UN University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccini, P. and Bader, H.-P.: 1996, Regionaler Stoffhaushalt: Erfassung, Bewertung und Steuerung, Heidelberg and Berlin, Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, H.J. and Morse, C.: 1963, Scarcity and Growth: The Economics of Natural Resource Availability, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgström, G.: 1973, Harvesting the Earth(first published under the title World Food Resources), New York, Abelard-Schuman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., Flavin, C., French, H. et al.: Annual, The State of the World, A Report of the Worldwatch Institute, W.W. Norton, New York, 1985–1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callejas, A.: 1998, Desarrollo de un Método para Medir la Huella Ecológica del Uso del Agua: Aplicada al Caso del Municipio de Xalapa, Veracruz, México (Development of a Method to Measure the Ecological Footprint of Water: Applied to the Case of Xalapa, Ver. Mexico), B.S. thesis, Centro de Estudios para la Sustentabilidad, Universidad Anáhuac de Xalapa and Departamento de Biologia, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton, W.: 1980, Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change, Urbana, University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R.: 1980, Embodied energy and economic valuation, Science 210, 1219-1224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, G. and Robb, C.: 1994, The ecological footprint of the Lions Gate Bridge, MRM 642 term paper. School of Resource and Environmental Management, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dominguez, J. and Robin, V.: 1992, Your Money or Your Life. Viking Penguin, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Kowalski, M., Haberl, H., Hüttler W., Payer, H., Schandl, H., Winiwarter, V. and Zangerl-Weisz, H.: 1997, Gesellschaftlicher Stoffwechsel und Kolonisierung von Natur, Verlag Fakultas, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Kautsky, N., Berg, H., Jansson, Å. and Troell, M.: 1998, The ecological footprint concept for sustainable seafood production: A review, Ecological Applications 8(1 Suppl.). Feb., 1998, S63-S71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Jansson, Å., Larsson, J. and Costanza, R.: 1997, Ecosystem appropriation by cities, Ambio 26(3), 167-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Gary Sue, Clifford Cobb and Mathis Wackernagel, 1999, Why Bigger isn't Better: The Genuine Progress Indicator — 1999 Update. Redefining Progress, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C.A.S., Cleveland, C.J. and Kaufmann, R.: 1986, Energy and Resource Quality, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, G., Kassam, A.H., Naiken, L, Fischer, G. and Shah, M.: 1983, Potential Population Supporting Capacities of Lands in the Developing World, Technical Report of Project Int/75/P13, Land Resources for Populations of the Future, commissioned by FAO, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), and United Nations Family Planning Association (UNFPA), FAO, Rome.

  • Hotelling, H.: 1931, The economics of exhaustible resources, Journal of Political Economy 39, 137-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacksonville Community Council Inc.: 1993, Life in Jacksonville: Quality Indicators for Progress. The Council, Jacksonville, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kautsky, N., Berg, H., Folke, C., Larsson, J. and Troell, M.: 1997, Ecological footprint for assessment of resource use and development limitations in shrimp and Tilapia aquiculture, Aquiculture Research 28(10), 753-766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieth, H. and Whittaker, R. (eds): 1975, The Primary Productivity of the Biosphere, New York, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, E.A., Warren, J.L. and Moran, S.R.: 1998, Discovering Industrial Ecology, Ohio, Columbus, Batelle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D., Meadows, D. and Randers, J.: 1992, Beyond the Limits, Post Mills, Vermont, USA, Chelsea Green Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming, D.W. and Henninger, D.L. (eds) 1989, Lunar Base Agriculture: Soils for Plant Growth. Amer. Soc. Agron., Crop Sci. Soc. Amer., Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Madison, Wisconsin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miringoff, M., and Miringoff, M.-L.: 1999, The Social Health of the Nation: How America is Really Doing. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D., and Diener, E.: 1995, Who is happy?, Psychological Science 6(1), 10-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Economics Foundation and Touche Ross: 1995, The Sustainability Indicators Research Project: Local Agenda 21: Final Report. New Economics Foundation, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R.F. and Cooperrider, A.Y.: 1994, Saving Nature's Legacy — Protecting and Restoring Biodiversity, Washington DC, Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum, H.T.: 1996, Environmental Accounting: EMERGY and Environmental Decision Making, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omernick, J.M.: 1987, Ecoregions of the conterminous United States, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77, 118-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overby, R.: 1985, ‘The urban economic environmental challenge: Improvement of human welfare by building and managing urban ecosystems’, Presented at POLMET 85, Urban Environmental Conference, Hong Kong.

  • Pavot, W., Diener, E. and Suh, E.: 1998, The temporal satisfaction with life scale, Journal of Personality Assessment 70No. 2 pp. 340-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, W.E. and Wackernagel, M.: 1994, Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: Measuring the natural capital requirements of the human economy, in A.M. Jansson, M. Hammer, C. Folke and R. Costanza (eds), Investing in Natural Capital: The Ecological Economics Approach to Sustainability, Washington DC, Island Press, pp. 362-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, A., Wackernagel, M. and Müller, K.: 2000, The Winners and Losers in Global Competition: Why Eco-Efficiency Reinforces Competitiveness: A Study of 44 Nations, Rüegger Verlag, Chur/Zürich, ISBN 3-7253-0658-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP): Annual, Human Development Report, New York, Oxford University Press.

  • Veenhoven, R.: 1999, The four qualities of life: ordering concepts and measures of the good life, Draft. Erasmus University Utrecht, See also: http://www.eur.nl/fsw/research/happiness.

  • Vitousek, P.M., Ehrlich, P.R., Ehrlich, A.H. and Mateson, P.A.: 1986, Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis, BioScience 34, 368-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M. and Rees, W.E.: 1996, Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth, Gabriola Island, BC, New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., Onisto, L., Callejas Linares, A., López Falfán, I.S., Méndez García, J., Suárez Guerrero, A.I., Suárez Guerrero, M.G.: 1997, Ecological Footprints of Nations: How Much Nature Do They Use? How Much Nature Do They Have?commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio+5 Forum, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, Toronto (Available through ICLEI: iclei@iclei.org).

  • Wackernagel, M.: 1998, The ecological footprint of Santiago de Chile, Local Environment 3(1), 7-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., Onisto L., Bello, P., Callejas Linares, A., López Falfán, I.S., Méndez García, J., Suárez Guerrero, A.I. and Suárez Guerrero, M.G.: 1999a, National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept, Ecological Economics 29(3), 375-390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., Lewan, L. and Hansson, C.: 1999b, Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint: applications in Sweden and subregions, Ambio 28(7), 604-612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., Callejas, A., Sánchez, M.A.V., Falfán, I.S.L., Deumling, D. and Onisto, L.: 1999c, The Ecological Footprints of Nations Update for 1995, Report to the Union Bancaire Privée, Geneva, Redefining Progress, San Francisco and Centro de Estudios para la Sustentabilidad, Xalapa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada, Y.: 1993, The Appropriated Carrying Capacity of Tomato Production: The Ecological Footprint of Hydroponic Greenhouse versus Mechanized Open Field Operations, M.A. Thesis. School of Community and Regional Planning, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED: 1987, Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development, (Gro Harlem Brundtland, Chair), Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF: 1998, Living Planet Report 1998: Overconsumption is Driving the Rapid Decline of the World's Natural Environments. World Wide Fund for Nature International (WWF), Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wackernagel, M., Yount, J.D. Footprints for Sustainability: The Next Steps. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2, 23–44 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010050700699

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010050700699

Navigation