Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Publication Productivity of Young Scientists: An Empirical Study

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research was conducted on a sample of 840 respondents who represent half of the Croatian population of young scientists. There are three main features which define the publication productivity of young scientists. 1) Despite the worsened position of R & D, they publish more scientific papers than the young generations of scientists at the beginning of the nineties. 2) Differences between a highly-productive minority, which produces on average half of all scientific publications, and a low-productive majority is already apparent in young scientists. 3) The productivity of young scientists is formed according to productivity patterns typical of particular scientific fields and disciplines.

With regard to the explanation of productivity, the following has been found. a) An expansion of the set of predictors resulted in an improvement in the explanation of the productivity of young scientists compared with previous surveys. b) Among the factors which contribute significantly to the explanation of the quantity of scientific publications, the most powerful predictor is attendance at conferences abroad, followed by scientific qualifications and some gatekeeping variables. c) Besides certain similarities, scientific fields also show a specific structure of determinants of young scientists' productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. M. Dobrov, Potencijal nauke (Scientific Potential), Institut za naučno-tehničku dokumentaciju i informacije — Centar za proučavanje politike razvoja naučnog rada, Beograd, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Zuckerman, R. K. Merton, Age, aging and age structure in science. In: K. Merton, The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, 1974, pp. 497-559.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Cole, Comments on “Indicators of scientific manpower”, Scientometrics, 2 (1980) 405-409.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Roche, Y. Freites, Rise and twilight of the Venezuelan scientific community, Scientometrics, 23 (1992) 267-289.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Saavedra, M. R. Mackenzie, R. Pessot, M. Krauskopf, Size and aging of the scientific commmunity in Chile, Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 105-117.

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. C. Lehman, Age and Achievement, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Golub, Potencijalni (profesionalni i vanjski) egzodus mladih znanstvenika (Potential, Professional and External Exodus of Young Scientists). In: K. PrpiĆ (Ed.), U potrazi za akterima znanstvenog i tehnološkog razvoja (In Search of the Protagonists of Scientific and Technological Development), Institut za društvena istraživanja, Zagreb, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. R. Cole, S. Cole, Social Stratification in Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. Cole, Age and scientific performance, American Journal of Sociology, 84 (1979) 958-977.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. J. Mulkay, The Social Process of Innovation, Macmillan, London, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  12. T. F. Gieryn, R. F. Hirsh, Marginality and innovation in science, Social Studies of Science, 13 (1983) 87-106.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Messeri, Age differences in the reception of new scientific theories: The case of plate tectonics theory, Social Studies of Science, 18 (1988) 91-112.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Z. Zhao, G. H. Jiang, Life-span and precocity of scientists, Scientometrics, 9 (1986) 27-36.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Han, Linear increase law of optimum age of scientific creativity, Scientometrics, 15 (1980) 309-312.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. D. Knorr,, R. Mittermeir, G. Aichholzer, G. Waller, Individual publication productivity as a social position effect in academic and industrial research units. In: F. M. Andrews (Ed.), Scientific Productivity, the Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries, Cambridge University Press — Unesco, Cambridge — London — New York — Melbourne — Paris, 1979, pp. 55-120.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Kyvik, Age and scientific productivity: Differences between fields of learning. In: The Study of Science and Technology in the 1990's: Abstracts, Society for Social Studies of Science — European Association for the Study of Science and Technology, Amsterdam, 1988 pp. 140-141.

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Todorovsky, On the working time budget of the university teacher, Scientometrics, 40 (1997) 13-21.

    Google Scholar 

  19. V. A Markusova, R. S. Gilyarevskii, A. I. Chernyi, B. C. Griffith, Information behavior of russian scientists in the “Perestroika” period. Results of the questionnaire study, Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 361-380.

    Google Scholar 

  20. D. C. Pelz, F. M. Andrews, Scientists in Organizations: Productive Climates for Research and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Kowalewska, Patterns of influence and the performance of research units. In: F. M. Andrews (Ed.), Scientific Productivity, the Effectiveness of Research Groups in Six Countries, Cambridge University Press — Unesco, Cambridge — London — New York — Melbourne — Paris, 1979, pp. 169-189.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. G. Heffner, Authorship recognition of subordinates in collaborative research, Social Studies of Science, 9 (1979) 377-384.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Kumar, Role parity in international social science collaborative research: Research roles of U.S. researchers and their collaborators, Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilisation, 7 (1985) 7-32.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Schulze, On the rise of scientific innovation and their acceptance in research groups: A sociopsychological study, Social Studies of Science, 20 (1990) 35-64.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Thagaard, Research environment, motivation and publication productivity, Science Studies, 4 (1991) 5-18.

    Google Scholar 

  26. C. L. Mulford, L. Waldner-Haugrud, H. Gajbhiye, Variables associated with agricultural scientists' work alienation and publication productivity, Scientometrics, 27 (1993) 261-282.

    Google Scholar 

  27. L. Fonseca, S. Velloso, S. Wofchuk, L. De Meis, The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity, Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 159-171.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Grupp, S. Hinze, International orientation, efficiency of and regard for research in East and West Germany: A biblometric investigation of aspects of technology genesis in the United Germany, Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 83-113.

    Google Scholar 

  29. K. PrpiĆ, Znanstvena produktivnost istraživača između minimalizma i maksimalizma (Scientific productivity of researchers between minimalism and maximalism). In: K. PrpiĆ, B. Golub, Znanstvena produktivnost i potencijalni egzodus istraživača Hrvatske (Scientific Productivity and Potential Exodus of Croatian Researchers) Institut za društvena istraživanja Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, 1990, pp. 1-61.

    Google Scholar 

  30. K. PrpiĆ, Profesionalni i društveni položaj mladih istraživača (Professional and social position of young researchers). In: K. PrpiĆ (Ed.), U potrazi za akterima znanstvenog i tehnološkog razvoja (In Search of the Protagonists of Scientific and Technological Development), Institut za društvena istraživanja, Zagreb, 2000, pp. 21-127.

    Google Scholar 

  31. K. PrpiĆ, Odrednice znanstvene produktivnosti (Determinants of Scientific Productivity), Institut za društvena istraživanja Sveučilšta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  32. K. PrpiĆ, The socio-cognitive frameworks of scientific productivity, Scientometrics, 31 (1994) 294-311.

    Google Scholar 

  33. K. PrpiĆ, Characteristcs and determinants of eminent scientists' productivity, Scientometrics, 36 (1996) 185-206.

    Google Scholar 

  34. S. Eastwood, P. Derish, E. Leash, S. Ordway, Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey, Science and Engineering Ethics, 2 (1996) 89-114.

    Google Scholar 

  35. S. Hemlin, M. Gustafsson, Research production in the arts and humanities. A questionnaire study of factors influencing research performance, Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 417-432.

    Google Scholar 

  36. S. Kyvik, Productivity differences, fields of learning, and Lotka's law, Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 205-214.

    Google Scholar 

  37. W. O. Hagstrom, Competition in science, American Sociological Review, 39 (1974) 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  38. B. KlaiĆ, Scijentometrija ili peer review? (Scientometrics or peer review?). In: D. Polšek (Ed.), Vidljiva i nevidljiva akademija. Moguénosti društvene procjene znanosti u Hrvatskoj (Visible and Invisible Academy. Social Appraisal of Science and Scientists in Croatia), Institut društvenih znanosti Ivo Pilar, Zagreb, 1998, pp. 83-96.

    Google Scholar 

  39. K. PrpiĆ, Scientific fields and eminent scientists' productivity patterns and factors, Scientometrics, 37 (1996) 445-471.

    Google Scholar 

  40. S. Kyvik, I. M. Larsen, International contact and research performance, Scientometrics, 29 (1994) 161-172.

    Google Scholar 

  41. B. Stefaniak, International cooperation of Polish researchers with partners from abroad: A scientometric study, Scientometrics, 41 (1998) 155-167.

    Google Scholar 

  42. F. Mali, Slovenska in evropska skupnost znanstvenikov (Slovenian and European community of Scientists), Teorija in praksa /Theory and Practice/, 28 (1991) 452-458.

    Google Scholar 

  43. K. BalÁzs, W. Faulkner, U. Schimank, Transformation of the research systems of post-communist Central and Eastern Europe: An introduction, Social Studies of Science, 25 (1995) 613-632.

    Google Scholar 

  44. E. Z. Mirskaya, Russian academic science today: Its societal standing and the situation within the scientific community, Social Studies of Science, 25 (1995) 705-725.

    Google Scholar 

  45. G. Sonnert, What makes a good scientist?: Determinants of peer evaluation among biologists, Social Studies of Science, 25 (1995) 35-55.

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. Leta, D. Lannes, L. De Meis, Human resources and scientific productivity in Brazil, Scientometrics, 41 (1998) 313-324.

    Google Scholar 

  47. A. R. Babu, Y. P. Singh, Determinants of research productivity, Scientometrics, 43 (1998) 309-329.

    Google Scholar 

  48. L. Fonesca, S. Velloso, S. Wofchuk, L. De Meis, The importance of human relationships in scientific productivity, Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 159-171.

    Google Scholar 

  49. P. D. Allison, J. A. Stewart, Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage, American Sociological Review, 39 (1974) 596-606.

    Google Scholar 

  50. P. D. Allison, Inequality and scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 10 (1980) 163-179.

    Google Scholar 

  51. P. D. Allison, J. S. Long, T. K. Krauze, Cumulative advantage and inequality in science, American Sociological Review, 77 (1982) 615-625.

    Google Scholar 

  52. A. J. Nederhof, A. F. J. Van Raan, Peer review and bibliometric indicators of scientific performance: A comparison of cum laude doctorates with ordinary doctorates in physics, Scientometrics, 11 (1987) 333-350.

    Google Scholar 

  53. A. J. Nederhof, A. F. J. Van Raan, A validation study of bibliometric indicators: The comparative performance of cum laude doctorates in chemistry, Scientometrics, 17 (1989) 427-435.

    Google Scholar 

  54. A. F. J. Van Raan, In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much, Scientometrics, 43 (1998) 129-139.

    Google Scholar 

  55. R. D. Whitley, The sociology of scientific work and the history of scientific developments. In: S. S. Blume (Ed), Perspectives in the Sociology of Science, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester — New York — Brisbane — Toronto, 1977, pp. 21-50.

    Google Scholar 

  56. R. Whitley, The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Social Research of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia)

    Katarina Prpić

Authors
  1. Katarina Prpić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prpić, K. The Publication Productivity of Young Scientists: An Empirical Study. Scientometrics 49, 453–490 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010541707878

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010541707878

Keywords

Search

Navigation