Abstract
Since the first magnetic analyses of archaeological materials were carried out over a century ago, archaeomagnetic reference curves are now available covering the last few millennia. It would seem to be an appropriate time to examine the archaeomagnetic record to see how it can be improved. For directional studies the disturbing factors include magnetic refraction, mechanical deformation, local magnetic field anomalies, and magnetic anisotropy. In the complex field of archaeointensity determination there is a real need for faster and more reliable methods. The use of sediments on Palaeolithic sites will be increasingly important for the dating of early hominids.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
G. Folgeraiter, Arch. Sci. Phys. Nat., (Genè ve), 8 (1899) 5.
J. L. Eighmy, J. H. Hathaway, Geoarchaeology, 2 (1987) 49.
R. C. Lange, B. A. Murphy, A Discussion of Collection Factors Affecting the Quality of Archaeomagnetic Results, in: Archaeomagnetic Dating, J. L. Eighmy, R. S. Sternberg (Eds), Tucson, Arizona University Press, 1990, p. 65.
A. J. Clark, D. H. Tarling, M. Noel, J. Archaeol. Sci., 15 (1988) 645.
E. Thellier, Phys. Earth Planet Inter., 24 (1981) 89.
M. Kovacheva, Prehistoric sites studied archaeomagnetically, in: Archaeometry '90, E. Pernicka, G. A. Wagner (Eds), Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1991, p. 559.
D. H. Tarling, M. J. Dobson, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 47 (1995) 5.
J. H. Hathaway, G. J. Krause, The Sun Compass Versus the Magnetic Compass, in: Archaeomagnetic Dating, J. L. Eighmy, R. S. Sternberg, (Eds), Tucson, University of Arizona Press, 1990, p. 139.
E. Bucur, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 87 (1994) 95.
G. Fischer, P.-A. Schnegg, Up-dating the Geomagnetic Survey of Switzerland, Matér. Géol. Suisse, Géophys., 1994, p. 27.
R. S. Coe, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 56 (1979) 369.
M. D. Evans, G. S. Hoye, Magnetic refraction and Archaeomagnetic fidelity, in: Archaeometry '90,. Proc. 27th Symp. on Archaeometry, Heidelberg, E. Pernicka, G. A. Wagner (Eds), Basel, Birkhauser Verlag, 1991, p. 551.
M. J. Aitken, H. N. Hawley, Archaeometry, 13 (1971) 187.
M. R. Harold, Archaeometry, 3 (1960) 45.
G. H. Weaver, Archaeometry, 4 (1961) 21.
G. H. Weaver, Archaeometry, 5 (1962) 93.
H. C. Soffel, K. Schurr, Geophys. J. Intern., 102 (1990) 551.
M. J. Aitken, Magnetic dating, in: Physics and Archaeology, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1974, p. 161.
I. G. Hedley, J.-J. Wagner, The Origin of the Magnetic Anisotropy in Pottery.Abstract. 21st Symp. for Archaeometry, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, N.Y., 1981, p. 43.
J. Rogers, J. M. W. Fox, M. J. Aitken, Nature, 277 (1979) 644.
R. J. Veitch, I. G. Hedley, J. J. Wagner, Arch. Sc. (Genè ve) 37 (1984) No. 3, 359.
R. Maag, Ein Kalkbrennofen im Legionslager von Vindonissa, in: Jahresbericht 1982, Gesellschaft Pro Vindonissa, Brugg, 1983, p. 65.
Ph. Lanos, L.archéomagnétisme, in: Les méthodes de datation en archéologie, Editions Errance, Paris, 1998, p. 119.
W. R. Wood, D. L. Johnson, Adv. Archaeol. Meth. Theo., 1 (1978) 315.
R. S. Sternberg, E. Lass, E. Marion, K. Katari, M. Holbrook, Geoarchaeology, 14 (1999) 415.
I. G. Hedley, Y. Billaud, Deformation of Burnt Structures and Archaeomagnetic Error, Proc. 31st Archaeometry Symp., Budapest,1998. British Archaeological Reports. European Series. Archaeolingua Publishers, Budapest, 1999 (in press).
S. Levi, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 13 (1977) 245.
E. Thellier, O. Thellier, Ann. Géophys., 15 (1959) 285.
R. S. Coe, J. Geophys. Res., 72 (1967) 3247.
J. Shaw, Geophys. J. Astron. Soc., 76 (1974) 637.
I. G. Hedley, J.-J. Wagner, A Magnetic Investigation of Roman and Pre-Roman Pottery, in: Archaeometry '90. Proc. 27th Symp. on Archaeometry, E. Pernicka, G. A. Wagner (Eds), Heidelberg. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, 1991, p. 275.
W. E. Senanayake, M. W. McElhinny, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 30 (1982) 317.
Y. Cui, K. L. Verosub, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 91 (1995) 261.
E. Thellier, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 13 (1977) 241.
D. Walton, Rev. Geophys., 26 (1988) 15.
M. J. Aitken, A. L. Allsop, G. D. Bussell, M. B. Winter, Rev. Geophys., 26 (1988) 3.
D. Walton, J. Shaw, J. Share, J. Hakes, J. Appl. Phys., 71 (1992) 1549.
J. Shaw, D. Walton, S. Yang, T. C. Rolph, J. A. Share, Geophys. J. Inter., 124 (1996) 241.
E. McClelland, J. C. Briden, J. Geophys. Res., 101, B10 (1996) 21995.
H. Tanaka, Geophys. J. Inter. 137 (1999) 261.
F. Heller, H. Markert, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 31 (1973) 395.
G. J. Borraidale, J. Archaeol. Sci., 24 (1997) 813.
R. S. Sternberg, R. H. McGuire, Techniques for Constructing Secular Variation Curves and for Interpreting Archaeomagnetic Dates, in: Archaeomagnetic Dating, J. L. Eighmy and R. S. Sternberg (Eds), University of Arizona Press, Tucson, 1990, p. 199.
R. S. Sternberg, Archaeomagnetic dating, in: Chronometric Dating in Archaeology, R. L. Taylor, M. J. Aitken (Eds), Plenum Press, New York, p. 324.
C. Batt, Archaeometry, 39 (1997) 153.
R. S. Sternberg, J. Geophys. Res., 94 (1989) 527.
I. G. Hedley, P. Vuagnat, J.-J. Wagner, Terra Cognita, 4 (1984) 361.
M. Le Goff, B. Henry, L. Daly, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 70 (1992) 4.
M. E. Evans, L. Jiang, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 48 (1996) 1531.
N. E. Jordanova, E. Petrovsky, M. Kovacheva, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49 (1997) 543.
C. Batt, M. Noel, New themes in archaeomagnetism, in: Archaeometry '90. Proceedings of the 27th Symp. on Archaeometry, E. Pernicka, G. A. Wagner (Eds), Birkhäuser Verlag, Heidelberg, Basel, 1991, p. 541.
J. L. Eighmy, J. B. Howard, American Antiquity, 56 (1991) 88.
J. M. Pares, A. Perez-Gonzalez, Science, 269 (1995) 830.
J. Gagnepain, I. G. Hedley, C. Peretto, Arkeos, 5 (1999) 29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hedley, I.G. New directions in archaeomagnetism. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 247, 663–672 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010627821170
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010627821170