Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Productivity and Price Performance in the Privatized Water and Sewerage Companies of England and Wales

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After its privatization in 1989, the water and sewerage industry of England and Wales faced a new regulatory régime and implemented a substantial capital investment program aimed at improving water and environmental standards. A new RPI+K regulatory pricing system was designed to compensate the industry for its increased capital costs, encourage increased efficiency, and maintain fair prices for customers. This paper evaluates how successful privatization and the resulting system of economic regulation has been. Estimates of productivity growth, derived with quality adjusted output indices, suggest that despite reductions in labor usage, total factor productivity growth has not improved since privatization. Moreover, total price performance indices reveal that increases in output prices have outstripped increases in input costs, a trend which is largely responsible for the increase in economic profits that has occurred since privatization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alchian, A. A. 1965. “Some Economics of Property Rights.” Il Politico 30: 816-829.

    Google Scholar 

  • Averch, H., and L.L. Johnson. 1962. “Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint.” American Economic Review 52: 1052-1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, E. E. 1973. Economic Theory of Regulatory Constraint. Lexington: D.C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, V., and M. Khan. 1995. “Privatization and Employment: A Study of the Jute Industry in Bangladesh.” American Economic Review 85(1): 267-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, M., and M. Green. 1995. “Privatization and Recession—The Miracle Tested.” CRI Discussion Paper 10. London: Center for the Study of Regulated Industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, M., and D. Thompson. 1992. “Regulatory Reform and Productivity Growth in the U.K.'s Public Utilities.” Applied Economics 24: 1181-1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, D., and P. Stoneman. 1998. An Efficiency Study for the Water Industry, Final Report: A Report to National Economic Research Associates. London: National Economic Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosworth, D., P. Stoneman, and E. Thanassoulis. 1996. The Measurement of Comparative Total Efficiency in the Sewerage and Water Industry: An Exploratory Study. Birmingham: Office of Water Services (Ofwat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boubakri, N., and J. C. Cosset. 1998. “The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: Evidence from Developing Countries.” Journal of Finance 53(3): 1081-1110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bös, D. 1991. Privatization: a Theoretical Treatment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boycko, M. A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1996. “A Theory of Privatization.” Economic Journal 106: 309-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. 1978. “From Private Preferences to Public Philosophy: The Development of Public Choice.” In The Economics of Politics, edited by J. M. Buchanan, et al. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIPFA. 1989. The Water Industry: United Kingdom Services and Costs, 1988. London: The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. L. Harris, and D. Parker. 1999. Privatization and Supply Chain Management: On the Effective Alignment of Purchasing and Supply After Privatization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRI. 1995. The U.K. Water Industry: Water Services and Costs 1993/94. London: Center for the Study of Regulated industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRI. 1997. The U.K. Water Industry: Financial and Operating Review 1995/96. London: Center for the Study of Regulated industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board, M., P. Boulding, and I. Cawthorn. (Eds). 1999. The U.K. Water Industry: Water Statistics 1998. London: Center for the Study of Regulated Industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Alessi, L. 1980. “The Economics of Property Rights: A Review of the Evidence.” Research in Law and Economics 2: 1-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fraja, G. 1993. “Productive Efficiency in Public and Private Firms.” Journal of Public Economics 30: 15-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. E. 1976. “Exact and Superaltive Index Numbers.” Journal of Econometrics 11: 5-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • DOE. 1986. Privatization of the Water Authorities in England and Wales. London: Department of the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • DWI. 1999. Drinking Water 1998: A Report by the Chief Drinking Water Inspector. London: Drinking Water Inspectorate, Department of Environment, Transport, and Regions.

    Google Scholar 

  • EA. 1999. Annual Reports & Accounts: 1998/99. London: Environment Agency, Department of Environment, Transport, and Regions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europe Economics. 1998. Water and Sewerage Industries General Efficiency and Potential for Improvement, Final Report. London: Europe Economics for Ofwat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galal, A., L. Jones, P. Tandon, and I. Vogelsang. 1994. Welfare Consequences of Selling Public Enterprises. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. 1997. Econometric Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S., and O. D. Hart. 1980. “Takeover Bids, the Free-rider Problem, and the Theory of the Corporation.” Bell Journal of Economics 94: 691-719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, C. 1998. Regulation of the U.K. Water Industry. London: Center for the Study of Regulated Industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B., and J. Tirole. 1993. “Market Liquidity and Performance Monitoring.” Journal of Political Economy 10: 678-709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. C., and E. L. Lynk. 1995. “Privatization and Efficiency in the U.K. Water Industry: An Empirical Analysis.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 57(3): 371-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M., and W. R. Meckling. 1976. “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305-360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, D. W., and Z. Griliches. 1967. “The Explanation of Productivity Change.” Review of Economic Studies 34: 249-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J., and J. Tirole. 1991. “Privatization and Incentives.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 7: 84-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, S. C. 1983. Regulation of British Telecommunications' Profitability. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, S. C. 1986. Economic Regulation of Privatized Water Authorities. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynk, E. L. 1993. “Privatization, Joint Production and the Comparative Efficiencies of Private and Public Ownership: The U.K. Water Industry Case.” Fiscal Studies 14(2): 98-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S., and D. Parker. 1997. The Impact of Privatization: Ownership and Corporate Performance in the U.K. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megginson, W. L., R. C. Nash, and M. van Randenborgh. 1994. “The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: an International Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Finance 49(2): 403-452.

    Google Scholar 

  • NERA 1996. The Performance of the Privatized Industries: Efficiency: Volume 3, A Report for the Center for Policy Studies. London: National Economic Research Associates/Centre for Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D., and M. G. Pollitt. 1997. “The Restructuring and Privatization of the CEGB—Was it Worth it?” Journal of Industrial Economics 45(3): 269-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • NRA. 1996. Annual Reports & Accounts: 1998/99. National Rivers Authority.

  • O'Connell Davidson, J. 1993. Privatization and Employment Relations: The Case of the Water Industry. London: Mansell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat. 1995. Competition in the Water Industry: Inset Appointments and their Regulation. Birmingham: Office of Water Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat. 1996. Report on levels of service for the water industry in England and Wales: 1995-6. Birmingham: Office of Water Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat. 1998a. A Benchmarking Study of the England and Wales Water Companies and Sydney Water Corporation Ltd for 1996/97. Birmingham: Office of Water Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat. 1998b. Prospects for Prices. Birmingham: Office of Water Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat. 1999a. Final Determinations: Future Water and Sewerage Charges 2000-05. Birmingham: Office of Water Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat. 1999b. 1999 July Returns for the Water Industry in England and Wales. CD-ROM. Birmingham: Office of Water Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofwat. 2000. 1998–1999 Report on Water and Sewerage Service Unit Costs and Relative Efficiency. Birmingham: Office of Water Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, S. 1994. “The Reconstruction of Industrial Relations in the Privatized Water Industry.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 32: 67-84.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Mahony, M. 1998. Britain's Competitive Performance: An Analysis of Productivity. London: National Institute for Economic and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. 1997. “Price Cap Regulation, Profitability and Returns to Investors in the U.K. Regulated Industries.” Utilities Policy 6(4): 303-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D. 1999. “The Performance of BAA Before and After Privatization: A DEA Study.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 33(2): 133-145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D., and S. Martin. 1997. The Impact of Privatization: Ownership and Corporate Performance in the U.K. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D., and H. L. Wu. 1998. “Privatization and Performance: A Study of the British Steel Industry under Public and Private Ownership.” Economic Issues 3(2): 31-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pint, E. 1991. “Nationalization vs. Regulation of Monopolies: The Effects of Ownership on Efficiency.” Journal of Public Economics 44(2): 131-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D., and E. Lobina. 1999. Employment and Profit Margins in U.K. Water Companies: Implications For Price Regulation Proposals. London: Public Services International Research Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappington, D. E., and J. E. Stiglitz. 1987. “Privatization, Information and Incentives.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 6(4): 567-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaoul, J. 1997. “A Critical Financial Analysis of the Performance of Privatized Industries: The Case of the Water Industry in England and Wales.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 8: 479-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. D., D. M. Hitchens, and S. W. Davies. 1982. International Industrial Productivity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. 1976. The Vote Motive. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vass, P. 1997. “The Methodology for Resetting X.” In Regulatory Review 1997, edited by P. Vass. London: Center for the Study of Regulated Industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J., and G. Yarrow. 1988. Privatization: An Economic Analysis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, J., and G. Yarrow. 1991. “Economic Perspectives on Privatization.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5(2): 111-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Water U.K. 2000. Waterfacts 2000. London: Water U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters II, W. G., and M. W. Tretheway. 1999. “Comparing Total Factor Productivity and Price Performance: Concepts and Applications to the Canadian Railways.” Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 33(2): 209-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willner, J. 1996. A Comment on Bradburd, ‘Privatization of Natural Monopolies’. Review of Industrial Organization 11: 869-882.

    Google Scholar 

  • WSA. 1997. Waterfacts. London: Water Services Association of England and Wales.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aston Business School, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, U.K.

    David S. Saal & David Parker

Authors
  1. David S. Saal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Parker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saal, D.S., Parker, D. Productivity and Price Performance in the Privatized Water and Sewerage Companies of England and Wales. Journal of Regulatory Economics 20, 61–90 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011162214995

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011162214995

Keywords

Search

Navigation