Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A practical concept for the ecological assessment of aquatic ecosystems: application on the River Dore in France

  • Published:
Aquatic Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ecological assessment of freshwater ecosystems necessitates to consider (i) the operational biological classification for defining a range of ecosystem alterations, (ii) operational biomonitoring tools fulfilling the requirements of the classification, (iii) ecological quality objectives to be preserved or restored. The development of this biomonitoring approach was illustrated by the study of the River Dore. Four biological qualities were defined with their related bio-indicators: (1) general biological quality (invertebrates), (2) biological sediment quality (oligochaetes), (3) biological water quality (diatoms) and (4) biological fish quality (fish communities). The selected bio-indicators were adjusted to an ecological classification model, based on a range of 8 ecological qualities, from `pristine' (S0) to extreme toxicity (S7). The model allows to use numerical index values as well as methods without index calculations, and to assess the general ecological quality of the river and its time-dependent evolution. At the sites downstream of industrial discharges, an improvement of the general ecological quality was observed from 1983 to 1995 in relation to sewage-treatment actions. A general ecological quality objective is proposed for each site of the river, taking into account the past and present ecological evolution of the river. The relevance of the approach greatly depends upon the accuracy of bio-indicator adjustment to the classification model and would be enhanced by taking into account other biological characteristics, like trophic status and hyporheic biocenoses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFNOR (1992) Essai des eaux: détermination de l'indice biologique global normalisé (IBGN). Norme française NF T 90–350

  • AFNOR (2000) Détermination de l'Indice biologique Diatomées (IBD). Norme française NF T 90–354

  • Blandin P (1986) Bioindicateurs et diagnostic des systèmes écologiques. Bull Ecol 17: 215–307

    Google Scholar 

  • CETE (1985) Etude hydrobiologique et physico-chimique de la Dore de l'amont de Vertolaye jusqu'à sa confluence avec l'Allier. Rapport Ministère de l'Urbanisme et du Logement/Ministère de l'Environnement, CETE Lyon/Clermont-Ferrand

  • Charvet S, Kosmala A and Staztner B (1998) Biomonitoring through biological traits of benthic macroinvertebrates: perspectives for a general tool in stream management. Arch Hydrobiol 142: 415–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke RT, Furse MT, Wright JF and Moss D (1996) Derivation of a biological quality index for river sites: comparison of the observed with the expected fauna. J Appl Stat 23: 311–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Coste M (1978) Sur l'utilisation des diatomées benthiques pour l'appréciation de la qualité biologique des eaux courantes. Thèse de Biologie Végétale, Université de Besançon (France)

    Google Scholar 

  • Coste M, Bosca C and Dauta A (1991) Use of algae for monitoring rivers in France. In: Whitton BA., Rott E and Friedrich G (eds.) Use of Algae for Monitoring Rivers. Innsbruck University, Innsbruck, (pp. 75–88)

    Google Scholar 

  • Danielopol DL (1989) Groundwater fauna associated with riverine aquifers. J N Am Benthol Soc 8: 18–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Descy JP and Coste M (1991) A test of methods for assessing water quality based on diatoms. Verh Internat Verein Limnol 24: 2112–2116

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw N and Vanhooren G (1983) Method for biological quality assessment of watercourses in Belgium. Hydrobiologia 100: 153–168

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pauw N, Ghetti PF, Manzini P and Spaggiari R (1992) Biological assessment methods for running waters. pp. 1–28. In: Newman P, Piavaux A and Sweeting R (eds.). River Water Quality-Ecological Assessment and Control. Published by the Commission of the European Communities EUR 14606 EN-FR, 1992-III, 751 pp

  • Dole-Olivier MJ, Marmonier P and Beffy JL (1997) Response of invertebrates to lotic disturbances: is the hyporheic zone a patchy refugium? Freshwat biol 37: 257–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois F and Sourp E (2000) Bilan de la qualité des eaux de la Dore. Comparaison de l'évolution de la qualité des eaux entre 1983 et 1995. II: Présentation générale du bassin de la Dore. Parc Naturel Régional du Livradois-Forez

  • Environmental Agency (1997) Assessing water quality-General Quality Assessment (GQA) scheme for biology. Fact sheet

  • Ghetti PF and Bonazzi G (1980) 3rd Technical Seminar 'Biological water assessment methods: Torrente Parma, Torrente Stirone, Fiume Po'-Final report. Commission of the European communities

  • Haury J, Peltre MC, Muller S, Trémolières M, Barbe J, Dutartre A and Guerlesquin M (1996) Des indices macrophytiques pour estimer la qualité des cours d'eau français: premières propositions. Ecologie 27: 233–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Haury J, Peltre MC and Muller S (2000) Les indices biologiques macrophytiques d'estimation de la qualité de l'eau: nouvelles propositions. Rapport de phase II, Inter-Agences de l'Eau/ENSA-INRA/Université de Metz

  • Hynes HBN (1983) Groundwater and stream ecology. Hydrobiologia 100: 93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • I.D.E. (1993) Etude bibliographique des méthodes biologiques d'évaluation de la qualité des eaux de surface continentales. Etude Inter Agences n°35, Ministère de l'Environnement

  • J. O. CE (1999) Position commune (CE) N° 41/1999, arrêtée par le Conseil du 22 octobre 1999. In: J.O. CE (pp. C 343/1–343/72), France

  • Lafont M (1989) Contribution à la gestion des eaux continentales: utilisation des Oligochètes comme descripteurs de l'état biologique et du degré de pollution des eaux et des sédiments. Thèse de Doctorat d'Etat ès Sciences, UCBL Lyon 1

  • Lafont M and Rosso A (1995) Contribution from CEMAGREF on the use of macrobenthos. In: The harmonised monitoring and classification of ecological quality of surface waters, report No CO 4030, WRc, European Commission, DG XI, pp. 207–226

  • Lafont M, Faessel B, Boucheron G, Larinier M, Berget JC, Vergon JP et Monnot A (1975) Incidences écologiques des rejets de stations de sports d'hiver sur les cours d'eau d'altitude. Rapport CTGREF Antony, étude n° 6

  • Lafont M, Coste M, Wasson JG and Faessel B (1988) Comparaison de quatre indices biologiques pour apprécier l'impact de la pollution dans des cours d'eau français. Naturaliste Can. (Rev. Ecol. Syst.) 115: 77–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafont M, Durbec A and Ille C (1992) Oligochaete worms as biological describers of the interaction between surface and groundwaters: a first synthesis. Regulated Rivers 7: 65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafont M, Camus JC and Rosso A (1996) Superficial and hyporheic Oligochaete communities as describers of pollution and water exchanges in the River Moselle system (France). Hydrobiologia 334: 147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafont M, Sourp E and Fournier A (2000) Bilan de la qualité des eaux de la Dore. Comparaison de l'évolution de la qualité des eaux entre 1983 et 1995. IV. Synthèse générale et conclusion. Parc Naturel Régional du Livradois-Forez

  • Leclerq L and Maquet B (1987) Deux nouveaux indices diatomiques et de qualité chimique des eaux courantes. Comparaison avec différents indices existants. Cah Biol Mar 28: 303–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Malard F, Tockner K and Ward JV (1999) Shifting dominance of subcatchment water sources and flow paths in a galcial flood-plain, Val Roseg, Switzerland. Arct Alpine Res 31: 135–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Mufti A, Fournier A, Ruban V, Fourneret G, Gilbert D, Sargos D, Lafont M, Mouthon J and Demars P (2000) Bilan de la qualité des eaux de la Dore. Comparaison de l'évolution de la qualité des eaux entre 1983 et 1995. III: Bilan de la qualité des eaux. Parc Naturel Régional du Livradois-Forez

  • Mouthon J and Faessel B (1978) Méthodes d'estimation de la qualité biologique des eaux courantes. Rapport technique CEE-CTGREF Antony

  • Nixon SC, Mainstone CP, Moth Iversen T, Kristensen P, Jeppesen E, Friberg N, Papathanassiou E, Jensen A and Pedersen F (1996) European Commission Directorate General XI., the harmonised monitoring and classification of ecological quality of surface waters in the European Union, final report. Report No CO 4150, WRc

  • Oberdorff T and Hughes RM (1992) Modification of an Index of Biotic Integrity based on fish assemblages to characterize rivers of the Seine Basin, France. Hydrobiologia 228: 117–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberdorff T, Pont D, Hugueny B, Boët P, Porcher JP and Chessel D (1999) Probabilistic model characterizing riverine fish communities of french rivers: a framework for the adaptation of a fish based index. 7th Int. Symp. on the Ecology of Fluvial Fishes (ISEFF), Penczak, Tadeusz, 10–13 May 1999

  • Prygiel J (1996) Utilisation de bioindicateurs pour l'estimation de la qualité des milieux aquatiques marins et continentaux du bassin Artois-Picardie. Thèse d'Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches, Université des Sciences et des Techniques, Lille

    Google Scholar 

  • Prygiel J and Coste M (1993) The assessment of water quality in the Artois Picardie water basin (France) by the use of diatom indices. Hydrobiologia 269/270: 343–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Prygiel J, Rosso-Darmet A, Lafont M, Lesniak C, Durbec A and Ouddane B (1999) Use of oligochaete communities for assessment of ecotoxicological risk in fine sediment of rivers and canals of the Artois-Picardie water basin (France). Hydrobiologia 410: 25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravera O (1979) Consideration on the effects of pollution at community and population level. Experientia 35: 710–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravera O (1996) Biological monitoring in marine environments. Coenoses 11: 131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravera O (1998) Utility and limits of biological and chemical monitoring of the aquatic environment. Ann Chim 88: 909–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleiter IM, Borchardt D, Wagner R, Dapper T, Schmidt KD, Schmidt HH and Werner H (1999) Modelling water quality, bioindication and population dynamics in lotic ecosystems using neural networks. Ecol Model 120: 271–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Slepukhina TD (1984) Comparison of different methods of water quality evaluation by means of Oligochaetes. Hydrobiologia 115: 183–186

    Google Scholar 

  • UE (2000) Directive 2000 CE du Parlement Européen et du Conseil établissant un cadre pour une politique communautaire dans le domaine de l'eau. Bruxelles, le 18 juillet 2000

  • Verdonschot PF (1990) Ecological characterization of surface waters in the province of Overijssel (The Netherlands). Thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdonschot PF and Nijboer RC (2000) Typology of macrofaunal assemblages applied to water and nature management: a Dutch approach. In: Wright JF, Sutcliffe DW and Furse MT (eds) Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters, RIVPACS and other techniques, Freshwater Biological Association, UK, (pp. 241–262)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux J (1994) Le macrobenthos et 'l'état de santé' des eaux douces. Fondements, contraintes et perspectives. In: Chartier-Touzé N, Galvin Y, Lévêque C and Souchon Y (eds) Etat de santé des écosystèmes aquatiques-Les variables biologiques comme indicateurs, Ministère de l'Environnement, Paris, (pp. 215–227)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verneaux J and Tufféry G (1967) Une méthode zoologique pratique de détermination de la qualité biologique des eaux courantes-Indices biotiques. Ann Sci Univ Besançon, Zool 3: 79–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Water Agencies (1999) Tools for the evaluation of the quality of water courses (S.E.Q.).Water Agencies study No. 72

  • Ward JV and Palmer MA (1994) Distribution patterns of interstitial freshwater meiofauna over a range of spatial scales, with emphasis on alluvial river-aquifer systems. Hydrobiologia 287: 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Western D (1992) The biodiversity crisis: a challenge for biology. Oikos 63: 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodiwiss FS (1978) Comparative study of biological-ecological water qualtiy assessment methods. Second practical demonstration. Summary Report. Commission of the European Communities

  • Wright JF (1995) Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing waters. Aus J Ecol 20: 181–197

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cemagref, Biology of Aquatic Ecosystems, 3bis Quai Chauveau, CP 220, F-69 336 Lyon Cedex 09, France

    Michel Lafont & Jean-Claude Camus

  2. CETE, ZI du Brézet, 8-10 rue Bernard Palissy, BP 11, F-63 014, Clermont-Ferrand, France

    Alain Fournier

  3. Natural Regional Park of Livradois-Forez, F-63 880, St-Gervais-sous-Meymont, France

    Eric Sourp

Authors
  1. Michel Lafont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Claude Camus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alain Fournier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Eric Sourp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lafont, M., Camus, JC., Fournier, A. et al. A practical concept for the ecological assessment of aquatic ecosystems: application on the River Dore in France. Aquatic Ecology 35, 195–205 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011413806318

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011413806318

Search

Navigation