Skip to main content
Log in

Determinants of Maternity Length of Stay: A Gamma Mixture Risk-Adjusted Model

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With obstetrical delivery being the most frequent cause for hospital admissions, it is important to determine health- and patient-related characteristics affecting maternity length of stay (LOS). Although the average inpatient LOS has decreased steadily over the years, the issue of the appropriate LOS after delivery is complex and hotly debated, especially since the introduction of the mandatory minimum-stay legislation in the USA. The purpose of this paper is to identity factors associated with maternity LOS and to model variations in LOS. A Gamma mixture risk-adjusted model is proposed in order to analyze heterogeneity of maternity LOS within obstetrical Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs). The determination of pertinent factors would benefit hospital administrators and clinicians to manage LOS and expenditures efficiently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Agha and D.S. Branker, Maximum likelihood estimation and goodness-of-fit tests for mixtures of distributions, Applied Statistics 46 (1997) 399–407.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Beaver, Y. Zhao, S. McDermid and D. Hindle, Casemix-based funding of Northern Territory public hospitals: adjusting for severity and socio-economic variations, Health Economics 7 (1998) 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.M. Bernard, R.A. Hayward, J.E. Anderson, J.S. Rosevear and L.F. McMahon, Jr., The integrated inpatient management model: lessons from managed care, Medical Care 33 (1995) 663–675.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Böhning, Computer-Assisted Analysis of Mixtures and Applications (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P. Braveman, S. Egerter, M. Pearl, K. Marchi and C. Miller, Problems associated with early discharge of newborn infants. Early discharge of newborns and mothers: a critical review of the literature, Pediatrics 96 (1995) 716–726.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Brooten, M. Roncoli, S. Finkler, L. Arnold, A. Cohen and M. Mennuti, A randomized trial of early hospital discharge and home followup of women having cesarean birth, Obstetrics and Gynecology 84 (1994)832–838.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E.M. Carty and C.F. Bradley, A randomized, controlled evaluation of early postpartum hospital discharge, Birth 17 (1990) 199–204.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird and D.B. Rubin, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 39 (1977) 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B.S. Everitt and D.J. Hand, Finite Mixture Distributions (Chapman & Hall, London, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Ginzinger, The revolt against the one-day stay, Health Care Strategic Management 14 (1996) 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Hindle, P. Degeling and O. van der Wel, Severity variations within DRGs: Measurement of hospital effects by use of data on significant secondary diagnoses and procedures, Australian Health Review 21 (1998) 37–49.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S.D. Horn, P.D. Sharkey, J.M. Buckle et al., The relationship between severity of illness and hospital length of stay and mortality, Medical Care 29 (1991) 305–317.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.C. Jansen, Maximum likelihood in a generalized linear finite mixture model by using the EM algorithm, Biometrics 49 (1993) 227–231.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A.H. Lee, J. Xiao, S.R. Vemuri and Y. Zhao, A discordancy test approach to identify outliers of length of hospital stay, Statistics inMedicine 17 (1998) 2199–2206.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K.M. Leung, R.M. Elashoff, K.S. Rees, M.M. Hasan and A.P. Legorreta, Hospital-and patient-related characteristics determining maternity length of stay: a hierarchical linear model approach, American Journal of Public Health 88 (1998) 377–381.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Marazzi, F. Paccaud, C. Ruffieux and C. Beguin, Fitting the distributions of length of stay by parametric models, Medical Care 36 (1998) 915–927.

    Google Scholar 

  17. G.J. McLachlan and K.E. Basford, Mixture Models (Dekker, New York, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.J. Moré, B.S. Garbow and K.E. Hillstrom, User Guide for MINPACK-1, ANL-80-74 (Argonne National Laboratory, Chicago, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. Quantin, E. Sauleau, P. Bolard, C. Mousson, M. Kerkri, P. Brunet Lecomte, T. Moreau and L. Dusserre, Modeling of high-cost patient distribution within renal failure diagnosis related group, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52 (1999) 251–258.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. Rissanen, Stochastic Complexity in Statistical Inquiry (Word Scientific, Singapore, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. K. Seal, Maternity mayhem, Managed Healthcare 5 (1995) 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Shorten, Obstetric early discharge versus traditional hospital stay, Australian Health Review 18 (1995) 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D.M. Titterington, A.F.M. Smith and U.E. Makov, Statistical Analysis of Finite Mixture Distributions (Wiley, Chichester, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  24. N.U. Udom and C.L. Betley, Effects of maternity-stay legislation on “drive-through deliveries”, Health Affairs 17 (1998) 208–215.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Xiao, D. Douglas, A.H. Lee and S.R. Vemuri, A Delphi evaluation of the factors influencing length of stay in Australian hospitals, International Journal of Health Planning and Management 12 (1997) 207–218.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, A.H., Ng, A.S. & Yau, K.K. Determinants of Maternity Length of Stay: A Gamma Mixture Risk-Adjusted Model. Health Care Management Science 4, 249–255 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011810326113

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011810326113

Navigation