Skip to main content
Log in

Unfolding a Theory of Systemic Intervention

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper interrogates four perspectives (structuralist community psychology, deconstruction, interpretive systemology, and critical systems thinking) to inform the unfolding of a theory of systemic intervention. A vision of epistemology is provided which clarifies the relationships among knowledge, power, will and intervention, and a normative framework for systemic intervention is then presented. Finally, the theory unfolded in this paper is deconstructed to reveal a second theory, yet to be explored, of systemic life projects. This provides an exciting agenda for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1981). Creating the Corporate Future, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, H., and Goolishian, H. (1992). The client is the expert: A not-knowing approach to therapy.In McNamee, S., and Gergen, K. (eds.), Therapy as Social Construction, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an Ecology of Mind, Paladin, St Albans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, A., Brown, M., and Midgley, G. (1999). Home and Away: Developing Services with Young People Missing from Home or Care, Centre for Systems Studies, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (1996). A framework for assessing participation. In Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (eds.), Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1979). The Systems Approach and Its Enemies, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darier, É. (1999). Foucault and the environment: An introduction. In Darier, É. (ed.), Discourses of the Environment, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1978). Writing and Différance, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1984). Deconstruction and the other. In Kearney, R. (ed.), Dialogues with Contemporary Continental Thinkers, Manchester University Press, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1946). Problems of Men, Philosophical Library, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutt, P. K. (1994). Problem contexts—A consultant's perspective. Syst. Pract. 7, 539-550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1990). Liberating Systems Theory, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1995). Solving Problem Solving, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. (1996). Holism and the Social ActionProblem Solving,’ Research Memorandum No.12, Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L. and Jackson, M. C. (1991a). Critical Systems Thinking: Directed Readings, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991b). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (1996a). Diversity Management: Triple Loop Learning, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (eds.) (1996b). Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power ?Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, Gordon C. (ed.), Harvester Press, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In Rabinow, P. (ed.), The Foucault Reader, Penguin, London, pp. 32-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. L. (1991a). The roots of reductionism: A counter-ontoepistemology for a systems approach. Syst. Pract. 4, 419-448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. L. (1991b). The self-referential structure of an everyday living situation: A phenomenological ontology for interpretive systemology. Syst. Pract. 4, 449-472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. L. (1991c). Truth and openness: An epistemology for interpretive systemology. Syst. Pract. 4, 473-490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R., and Fuenmayor, A. (1999a). Researching-acting-reflecting on public health services in Venezuela. I. A conceptual framework. Syst. Pract. Act. Res. 12, 35-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, A., and Fuenmayor, R. (1999b). Researching-acting-reflecting on public health services in Venezuela: II. Community action and critique. Syst. Pract. Act. Res. 12, 55-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuenmayor, R. L., Bonucci, M., and López-Garay, H. (1991). An interpretive-systemic study of the University of Los Andes. Syst. Pract. 4, 507-525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glidewell, J. C. (1966). Perspectives in community mental health. In Bennett, C. C., Anderson, L. S., Cooper, S., Hassol, L., Klein, D. C., and Rosenblum, G. (eds.), Community Psychology: A Report of the Boston Conference on the Education of Psychologists for Community Mental Health, Boston University Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A. J., and Jackson, M. C. (1992). Evaluating organizations: A systems and contingency approach. Syst. Pract. 5, 37-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. J. (1992). Critical Systems Thinking and Pluralism: A New Constellation, Ph.D. thesis, City University, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. J. (1996). Dealing with diversity. In Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (eds.), Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. J. (2000). Transforming self and society: A “critical appreciation” model. Syst. Pract. Act. Res. 13, 475-501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, W. J., Romm, N. R. A., and Walsh, M. P. (1994). The Trent Quality Initiative: A Multi-Agency Evaluation of Quality Standards in the National Health Service, Centre for Systems Studies, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and Human Interests, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984a). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalisation of Society, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984b). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume Two: The Critique of Functionalist Reason, Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1985). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures (English ed., 1987), Polity Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G. W. F. (1807). The Phenomenology of Mind, 2nd ed. (English version published 1931), George Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. H. (1997). A Critical Process for the Evaluation of Methodology, Ph.D. thesis, University of Hull, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. (1991). Work Psychology and Organizational Behaviour: Managing the Individual at Work, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, K. (1976). Guide to Quality Control, Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, K. (1984). Quality and standardisation: Progress for economic success. Qual. Prog. 1, 16-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1985). Systems inquiring competence and organizational analysis. In Proceedings of the 1985 Meeting of the International Society for General Systems Research, pp. 522-530.

  • Jackson, M. C. (1987). New directions in management science. In Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (eds.), New Directions in Management Science, Gower, Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1991). Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (1999). Towards coherent pluralism in management science. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 50, 12-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C. (2000). Systems Approaches to Management, Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. C., and Keys, P. (1984). Towards a system of systems methodologies. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 35, 473-486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1787). The Critiaue of Pure Reason, 2nd ed. (translated by Smith, N. K., and published in 1933), Macmillian, Basingstoke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larner, G. (1995). The real as illusion: Deconstructing power in family therapy. J. Family Ther. 17, 191-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Hum. Relat. 1, 2-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Garay, H. (1991). An interpretive-systemic study of the Regional Planning Corporation of Los Andes in Venezuela. Syst. Pract. 4, 491-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J. (1992). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, rev. ed., Shambhala, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1990). Creative methodology design. Systemist 12, 108-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1992a). The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking. Syst. Pract. 5, 5-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1992b). Pluralism and the legitimation of systems science. Syst. Pract. 5, 147-172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1994). Ecology and the poverty of humanism: A critical systems perspective. Syst. Res. 11, 67-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1995). Systemic intervention: A critical systems perspective. In Midgley, G., and Wilby, J. (eds.), Systems Methodology: Possibilities for Cross-Cultural Learning and Integration, Centre for Systems Studies, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1996). What is this thing called CST? In Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (eds.), Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1997a). Developing the methodology of TSI: From the oblique use of methods to creative design. Syst. Pract. 10, 305-319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1997b). Mixing methods: Developing systemic intervention. In Mingers, J., and Gill, A. (eds.), Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (1997c). Evaluating claims to critical systems thinking. In Stowell, F., et al. (eds.), Systems for Sustainability, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice, Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., Munlo, I., and Brown, M. (1998). The theory and practice of boundary critique: Developing housing services for older people. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 49, 467-478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, G., and Reynolds, M. (2001). Operational Research and Environmental Management: A New Agenda, Operational Research Society, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1978). Living Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1992a). Recent developments in critical management science. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 43, 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1992b). Technical, practical and critical OR—Past, present and future? In Alvesson, M., and Willmott, H. (eds.), Critical Management Studies, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., and Gill, A. (eds.) (1997). Multimethodology: The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Arias, A. E. (1996). An Interpretive-Systemic Study of Community Organizations in Venezuela, Ph.D. thesis, University of Hull, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Arias, A. E. (1998). An interpretive-systemic framework for the study of community organizations.Syst. Pract. Act. Res. 11, 543-562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Arias, A. E. (2000). Community organizations in Venezuela: Toward the disintegration of the modern state and the emergence of a “community organized” society? Syst. Pract. Act. Res.13, 165-187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga, J. C. (1988). Methodological foundations of systems methodologies. Syst. Pract. 1, 87-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliga, J. C. (1996). Power, Ideology and Control, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment ?exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory of community psychology. Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 15, 121-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., and Heron, J. (1995). Co-operative inquiry. In Smith, J. A., Harré, R., and Van Langenhove, L. (eds.), Rethinking Methods in Psychology, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A. (1996a). Inquiry-and-intervention in systems planning: Probing methodological rationalities. World Futures 47, 25-36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A. (1996b). Systems methodologies and intervention: The issue of researcher responsibility.In Flood, R. L., and Romm, N. R. A. (eds.), Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romm, N. R. A. (2001). Accountability in Social Research: Issues and Debates, Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1990). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, E. (1988). Back to the future, community psychology: Unfolding a theory of social intervention.Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 16, 3-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy, Haupt, Berne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, W. (1996). Critical Systems Thinking for Citizens: A Research Proposal, Research Memorandum No. 10, Centre for Systems Studies, University of Hull, Hull.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valero-Silva, N. (1996). Towards a critique of critical systems thinking within a Foucauldian framework: A “demystification process” or an “instrumental use” of critical theory. Syst. Pract. 9, 539-546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yolles, M. (2001). Viable boundary critique. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 52, 35-47.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Midgley, G., Ochoa-Arias, A.E. Unfolding a Theory of Systemic Intervention. Systemic Practice and Action Research 14, 615–649 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011977220479

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011977220479

Navigation