Abstract
The Indian economy today is highly prone to industrial pollution and ismaking compliance decisions in order to meet environmental standards.Environmental regulations impose significant costs upon industry that arefairly high and, therefore, require economic justification. This justificationcan be given by estimating the benefits associated with these costs. Whilethe scientific rationale behind air quality preservation is well understood,its economic rationale for a developing country like India, has to beverified. The objective of the present paper is to estimate the economicvalue that people in an urban area in India (Panipat Thermal Power Station(PTPS) Colony in Panipat, Haryana) place upon improving the air quality.The dose-response method, based on the Gerking and Stanley (1986) model,is used to estimate the economic benefits of air quality improvement. Theseestimates range from one to two percent of monthly income. Income andhealth status variables were significant determinants of peoples'willingness to pay (WTP) for air quality improvements. This lends supportto the neo-conventional wisdom `act now to protect the environment beforeit is too late'. These people are ready to pay for environmentalimprovements. We do believe, however, that the relatively successfulapplication of the dose response method at PTPS colony suggests that thetechnique can be more widely applied in developing countries like India.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Brandon, C. and K. Hommann (1995), The Cost of Inaction:Valuing the Economy-wide Cost of Environmental Degradation in India. Asia Environmental Division, World Bank.
Choe, K., D. Whittington and D. T. Luria(1996), ‘The Economic Benefits of Surface Water Quality Improvements in Developing Countries: Case Study of Dauao Philippines’, Land Economics 72, 519–537.
Courant, P. and R. Porter (1981), ‘Averting Expenditures andthe Cost of Pollution’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 8, 321–329.
Cropper, M. L., N. B. Simon, A. Alberini and P. K. Sharma(1997), ‘The Health Effects of Air Pollution in Delhi, India’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1860. Washington DC: World Bank.
Gerking, S. andL. R. Stanley (1986), ‘An Economic Analysis of Air Pollution and Health: The Case of St. Louis’, Review of Economics and Statistics 68, 115–121.
Fisher, A. and R. Zeckhauser (1976), ‘Averting Behavior and ExternalDiseconomies’, manuscript.
Harford, J. (1984), ‘Averting Behavior and theBenefits of Reduced Soiling’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 11, 296–302.
James, A. J. (1996), ‘Water PollutionAbatement: A Taxes and Standards Approach for Indian Industry’, Working Paper Series No. E/177/96. Delhi: Institute of Economic Growth.
Kumar, S.(1999), Economic Evaluation of Development Projects: A Case Analysis of Environmental Health Implications of Thermal Power Projects in India. Doctoral Dissertation submitted to the Centre for Economic Studies and Planning, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.
Mehta, S., S. Mundel and U. Shankar (1993),Incentives and Regulation for Pollution Abatement with an Application to Waste Water Treatment. New Delhi: National Institute of Public Finance and Policy.
Mishan, E. J. (1974), ‘What Is the Optimal Level of Pollution’, Journal ofPolitical Economy 82, 1278–1279.
Misra, S. (1996a), ‘Accounting forCosts of Water Pollution Abatement: A Case Study of Nandesari Industrial Area’, Working Paper E/179/96. Delhi: Institute of Economic Growth.
Misra, S. (1996b), ‘Measuring Benefits from Industrial Water Pollution Abatement:Use of Contingent Valuation Method in Nandesari Industrial Area of Gujarat in India’, Working Paper No. E/185/97. Delhi: Institue of Economic Growth.
Ostro, B. (1990), ‘Estimating the health effects of air pollutants, a method with anapplication to Jakarta’, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1301. Washington DC: World Bank.
Pearce, D., D. Whittington, D. Moran and S. Georgiou (1996), Economic Values and the Environment in the Developing World. London: Edward Elgar.
Shibata, H. and J. S. Winrich (1983),‘Control of Pollution when the Offended Defend Themselves’, Economica 50, 425–438.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, S., Rao, D. Valuing The Beneficts of Air Pollution Abatement Using a Health Production Function A Case Study of Panipat Thermal Power Station, India. Environmental and Resource Economics 20, 91–102 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012635627808
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012635627808