Abstract
This paper reports on a two-year classroom investigation of primary school (Years 1–8) technology education. The first year of the project explored emerging classroom practices in technology. In the second year intervention strategies were developed to enhance teaching, learning and assessment practices. Findings from the first year revealed that assessment was often seen in terms of social and managerial aspects, such as teamwork, turn taking and co-operative skills, rather than procedural and conceptual technological aspects. Existing formative interactions with students distorted the learning away from the procedural and conceptual aspects of the subject. The second year explored the development of teachers' technological knowledge in order to enhance formative assessment practices in technology, to inform classroom practice in technology, and to enhance student learning. Intervention strategies were designed to enhance the development of procedural, conceptual, societal and technical aspects of technology for teachers and students. The results from this intervention were very positive. This paper highlights the importance of developing teacher expertise pertaining to broad concepts of technology, detailed concepts in different technological areas and general pedagogical knowledge. The findings from this research therefore have implications for thinking about teaching, learning and assessment in technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (1997). Formative assessment and science education. Research Report, Learning in Science Project (Assessment). Hamilton, New Zealand: Centre for Science Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato.
Black, P. J. (1998). Testing: Friend or foe? Theory and practice of assessment and testing. London: The Falmer Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
Blenkin, G. (1992). Progression, observation and assessment in early education: The context. In G. V. Blenkin, & A. V. Kelly (Eds.), Assessment in early childhood education (pp. 24-45). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Butler, R. (1987). Task-involving and ego-involving properties of evaluation: Effects of different feedback conditions on motivational perceptions, interest and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 474-482.
Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438-481.
Gipps, C. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: Falmer Press.
Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355-392.
Goodson, I. F. (1985). Subjects for study. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Social histories of the secondary curriculum. London, Falmer Press.
Hattie, J., & Jaeger, R. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning: A deductive approach. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 111-122.
Hurst, V., & Lally, M. (1992). Assessment and the nursery curriculum. In G. V. Blenkin, & A. V. Kelly (Eds.), Assessment in early childhood education (pp. 46-68). London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Jones, A. (1999). Teachers' subject subcultures and curriculum innovation: the example of technology education. In J. Loughran (Ed.), Research teaching: Methodologies and practices for understanding pedagogy (pp. 155-171). London: Falmer Press.
Jones, A., & Carr, M. (1992). Teachers' perceptions of technology education: Implications for curriculum innovation. Research in Science Education, 22, 230-239.
Jones, A. T., Mather, V., & Carr, M. D. (1995). Issues in the practice of technology education. Hamilton, NZ: Centre for Science and Mathematics Education Research, University of Waikato.
Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (1998). Assessment in technology education: Developing a framework for research (Working Paper 522, Research in Assessment of Primary Technology Project). Hamilton, NZ: Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato.
Jones, A., & Simon, S. (1991). Strategies for educational change: The work of the OPENS project in the context of a new national curriculumfor science. Auckland, NZ: Longman Paul (SAMEpapers 1991).
Mavromattis, Y. (1997). Understanding assessment in the classroom: Phases of the assessment process–the assessment episode. Assessment in Education, 4(3), 381-399.
Ministry of Education. (1993). The New Zealand curriculum framework. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (1994). Assessment: Policy to practice. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
Ministry of Education. (1995). Technology in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, NZ: Learning Media.
Moreland, J. P. (1998). Technology education teacher development: The importance of experiences in technological practice. Unpublished M.Ed Thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Moreland, J., & Jones, A. (1999). Case studies of classroom practice in technology (Working Paper 523, Research in Assessment of Primary Technology Project). Hamilton, NZ: Centre for Science, Mathematics and Technology Education Research, University of Waikato.
Moreland, J., & Jones, A. (2000). Emerging assessment practices in an emergent curriculum: Implications for technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 283-305.
Northover, A. B. (1997). Teacher development in biotechnology: Teachers' perceptions and practice. Unpublished M.Ed Thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Paechter, C. (1992). Subject subcultures and the negotiation of open work: Conflict and cooperation in cross-curricular coursework. In R. McCormick, P. Murphy, & M. Harrison (Eds.), Teaching and learning technology (pp. 279-288). Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley, Open University Press.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative Assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 77-84.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moreland, J., Jones, A. & Northover, A. Enhancing Teachers' Technological Knowledge and Assessment Practices to Enhance Student Learning in Technology: A Two-year Classroom Study. Research in Science Education 31, 155–176 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012670514238
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012670514238