Skip to main content
Log in

Survival Rates in Bankruptcy Systems: Overlooking the Evidence

  • Published:
European Journal of Law and Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Extensive research on bankruptcy still has not made it possible to end the efficiency discussion concerning the need for a reorganization provision in bankruptcy laws. In this paper, I discuss the pervasiveness of asset sales in bankruptcy procedures and the effect it has on survival rates. Without these figures on going concern asset sales Western countries show astonishingly low firm survival rates. In addition, it becomes clear that the bankruptcy system in the US may be under-researched to such an extent that it seriously confounds our view of bankruptcy resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman, E. I. (1993). Corporate Financial Distress and Bankruptcy, 2nd ed, New York, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bankruptcy Yearbook Almanac (1997): Http://www.turnarounds.com/bya.htm

  • Brown, D. T., James, C. M. & Mooradian, R. M. (1994). “Asset Sales, by Financially Distressed Firms.” Journal of Corporate Finance.1, 233–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couwenberg, O. (1997). Resolving Financial Distress in the Netherlands, A Case Study Approach. Dissertation University of Groningen.

  • Eger, T. (2001). “Bankruptcy Regulations and the New German Insolvency Law from an Economic Point of View.” European Journal of Law and Economics. 11, 29–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, T. & Sundgren, S. (1997). “Is Chapter 11 too Favorable to Debtors? Evidence from Abroad.” Cornell Law Review. 82, 1532–1567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, E. (1989). “Statistical Analysis of Chapter 11.” Ernst & Young Study for Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.

  • Franks, F. R., Nyborg, K. G. & Torous, W. N. (1996). “A Comparison of US, UK, and German Insolvency Codes.” Financial Management. 25, 86–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, F. R., & Torous, W. N. (1994). “A Comparison of Financial Recontracting in Distressed Exchanges and Chapter 11 Reorganizations.” Journal of Financial Economics. 35, 349–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, S. C. (1997). “Transactions Costs and Capital Structure Choice: Evidence from Financially Distressed Firms.” The Journal of Finance. 52, 161–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, S. C., John, K. & Lang, L. H. P. (1990). “Troubled Debt Restructurings. An Empirical Study of Private Reorganization of Firms in Default.” Journal of Financial Economics. 27, 315–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotchkiss, E. S. (1995). “Postbankruptcy Performance and Management Turnover.” The Journal of Finance. 50, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Conklin, S. (1992). “Do Confirmed Chapter 11 Plans Consummate? The Results of a Study and Analysis of the Law.” Commercial Law Journal. 97, 297–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joossen, E. P. M. (1998). Overdracht van Ondernemingen uit Faillissement, Dissertation Catholic University of Brabant.

  • Kaiser, K. M. J. (1996). “European Bankruptcy Laws: Implications for Corporations Facing Financial Distress.” Financial Management, 25, 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, R. M., Ferris, S. P., Jayaraman, N. & Makhija, A. K. (1994). “A Glimpse at Professional Fees and Other Direct Costs in Small Firm Bankruptcies.” University of Illinois Law Review. 4, 847–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopucki, L. M. & Whitford, W. C. (1993). “Patterns in the Bankruptcy Reorganization of Large, Publicly Held Companies.” Cornell Law Review. 78, 597–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moret, Ernst & Young. (1996). Rescue required. A survey into the legislation of Germany, France, England, USA and Canada aiming at the renewal of the suspension of payments in the Bankruptcy Act of the Netherlands. Rotterdam.

  • Pulvino, T. C. (1999). “Effects of Bankruptcy Court Protection on Asset Sales.” Journal of Financial Economics. 52, 151–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, S. A. & Sundgren, S. (1998), “The Comparative Efficiency of Small-firm Bankruptcies: A Study of the US and the Finnish Bankruptcy Codes.” Financial Management. 27, 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (1992). “Liquidation Values and Debt Capacity: A Market Equilibrium Approach.” The Journal of Finance. 47, 1343–1366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Society of Practitioners of Insolvency, (1999); Http://www.r3.org.uk

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (1999). Statistisches Jahrbuch 1999. Wiesbaden.

  • Strömberg, P. (2000). “Conflicts of Interests and Market Illiquidity in Bankruptcy Auctions: Theory and Tests.” Working Paper, No. 459, University of Chicago.

  • Sundgren, S. (1998). “Does a Reorganization Law Improve the Ef.ciency of the Insolvency Law? The Finnish Experience.” European Journal of Law and Economics.6, 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundgren, S. (1995). Bankruptcy Costs and the Bankruptcy Code, A Case Study of the Finnish Code, Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration.

  • Thorburn, K. (2000). “Bankruptcy Auctions: Costs, Debt Recovery, and Firm Survival.” Journal of Financial Economics. 58, 337–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E. & Westbrook, J. L. (2000). “Financial Characteristics of Businesses in Bankruptcy.” Working Paper, No. 002, University of Texas Law School.

  • White, M. (1984). “Bankruptcy, Liquidation, and Reorganization.” In D. Loque (ed.), Handbook of Modern Finance, Boston, MA, Warren, Gorham & Lamont.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Couwenberg, O. Survival Rates in Bankruptcy Systems: Overlooking the Evidence. European Journal of Law and Economics 12, 253–273 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012821909622

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012821909622

Navigation