Skip to main content
Log in

On the Use of Value Efficiency Analysis and Some Further Developments

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the use of Value Efficiency Analysis (VEA) in efficiency evaluation when preference information is taken into account. Value efficiency analysis is an approach, which applies the ideas developed for Multiple Objective Linear Programming (MOLP) to Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Preference information is given through the desirable structure of input- and output-values. The same values can be used for all units under evaluation or the values can be specific for each unit. A decision-maker can specify the input- and output-values subjectively without any support or (s)he can use a multiple criteria support system to assist him/her to find those values on the efficient frontier. The underlying assumption is that the most preferred values maximize the decision-maker's implicitly known value function in a production possibility set or a subset. The purpose of value efficiency analysis is to estimate a need to increase outputs and/or decrease inputs for reaching the indifference contour of the value function at the optimum. In this paper, we briefly review the main ideas in value efficiency analysis and discuss practical aspects related to the use of value efficiency analysis. We also consider some extensions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, R., A. Athanassopoulos, R. G. Dyson and E. Thanassoulis. (1997). “Weights Restrictions and Value Judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, Development and Future Directions.” Annals of Operations Research 73, 13-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold V., I. Bardhan, W. W. Cooper and A. Gallegos. (1997). “Primal and Dual Optimality in Computer Codes Using Two-Stage Solution Procedures in DEA.” (Forthcoming in Aronson, J. and S. Zionts (Eds.): Operations Research: Models, Methods and Applications. Norwell: Kluwer (A Volume in honor of G. L. Thompson)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., A. Charnes and W. W. Cooper. (1984). “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Management Science 30, 1078-1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes. (1979). “Short Communication: Measuring Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 3, 339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin and L. M. Seiford. (1995). Data Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halme, M., T. Joro, P. Korhonen, S. Salo and J. Wallenius. (1999). “A Value Efficiency Approach to Incorporating Preference Information in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Management Science 45, 103-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joro, T., P. Korhonen and J. Wallenius. (1998). “Structural Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Multiple Objective Linear Programming.” Management Science 44, 962-970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P. (1987). “VIG-A Visual Interactive Support System for Multiple Criteria Decision Making.” Belgian Journal of Operations Research, Statistics and Computer Science 27, 3-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P. (1988). “A Visual Reference Direction Approach to Solving Discrete Multiple Criteria Problems.” European Journal of Operational Research 34(2), 152-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P. (1997). “Searching the Efficient Frontier in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Interim Report IR-97-79, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

  • Korhonen, P. and J. Karaivanova. (1999). “An Algorithm for Projecting a Reference Direction onto the Nondominated Set of Given Points.” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans 29(5), 429-435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P. and J. Laakso. (1986). “A Visual Interactive Method for Solving the Multiple Criteria Problem.” European Journal of Operational Research 24, 277-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P., A. Siljamäki and M. Soismaa. (1998). “Practical Aspects of Value Efficiency Analysis.” Interim Report IR-98-42, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

  • Korhonen, P., R. Tainio and J. Wallenius. (1998). “Value Efficiency Analysis of Academic Research.” European Journal of Operational Research 130, 121-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, P. and J. Wallenius. (1988). “A Pareto Race.” Naval Research Logistics 35, 615-623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedraja-Chaparro, F., J. Salinas-Jimenez and P. Smith. (1997). “On the Role of Weight Restrictions in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 8, 215-230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steuer, R. E. (1986). Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. G., F. Singleton, R. Thrall and B. Smith. (1986). “Comparative Site Evaluations for Locating a High-Energy Physics Lab in Texas.” Interfaces 16, 35-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. (1980). “The Use of Reference Objectives in Multiobjective Optimization.” In G. Fandel and T. Gal (Eds.), Multiple Objective Decision Making, Theory and Application. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierzbicki, A. (1986). “On the Completeness and Constructiveness of Parametric Characterizations to Vector Optimization Problems.” OR Spektrum 8, 73-87.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korhonen, P., Soismaa, M. & Siljamäki, A. On the Use of Value Efficiency Analysis and Some Further Developments. Journal of Productivity Analysis 17, 49–64 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013532219759

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013532219759

Navigation