Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic lot sizing with returning items and disposals

  • Published:
IIE Transactions

Abstract

We analyze a version of the Dynamic Lot Size (DLS) model where demands can be positive and negative and disposals of excess inventory are allowed. Such problems arise naturally in several applications areas, including retailing where previously sold items are returned to the point of sale and re-enter the inventory stream (such returns can be viewed as negative demands), and in managing kits of spare parts for scheduled maintenance of aircraft (where excess spares are returned to the depot), among other applications. Both the procurement of new items and the disposal of excess inventory decisions are considered within the framework of deterministic time-varying demands, concave holding, procurement and disposal costs and a finite time horizon (disposal of excess inventory at a profit is also allowed). By analyzing the structure of optimal policies, several useful properties are derived, leading to an efficient dynamic programming algorithm. The new model is shown to be a proper generalization of the classical Dynamic Lot Sizing Model, and the computational complexity of our algorithm is compared with that of the standard algorithms for the DLS model. Both the theoretical worst-case complexity analysis and a set of computational experiments are undertaken. The proposed methodology appears to be quite adequate for dealing with realistic-sized problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, A. and Park, J.K. (1993) Improved algorithms for economic lot size problems. Operations Research, 41, 549–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltrán, J.L. (1998) On inventory models with salable returns. Ph.D.Dissertation, Faculty of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltrán, J.L., Beyer, D., Krass, D. and Ramaswami, S. (1998) Stochastic inventory models with returns and delivery commitments.Working paper, Joseph L. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahl, H.C., Ritzman, L.R. and Gupta, J.N.D. (1987) Determining lot sizes and resources requirements: a review. Operations Research, 35, 329–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensoussan, A., Crouhy, M. and Proth, J.M. (1983) Mathematical Theory of Production Planning, North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, M.L. and Eglese, R.W. (1986) Use of preview exercises to forecast demand for new lines in mail order. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 37, 267–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chand, S. and Morton, T.E. (1982) Aperfect planning horizon procedure for a deterministic cash balance problem. Management Science, 28, 652–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R.R., Monma, C.L. and Veinott, Jr., A.F. (1987) Send and split method for minimum concave costs network flows. Mathematics of Operations Research, 12(4), 634–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federgruen, A. and Tzur, M. (1991) A simple forward algorithm to solve general dynamic lot sizing models with n periods O(n log n) or O(n) Time. Management Science, 37, 909–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florian, M. Lenstra, J.K. and Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G. (1980) Deterministic production planning: algorithms and complexity. Management Science, 26, 669–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, S.C. (1982) Using Lagrangian techniques to solve hierarchical production planning problems. Management Science, 28, 260–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luss, H. (1982) Operations research and capacity expansion problems: a survey. Operations Research, 30, 907–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manne, A.S. (1958) Programming of economic lot sizes. Management Science, 4, 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierry, M.C., Salomon, M., Van Nunen, J.A.E.E. and Van Wassenhove, L.N. (1995) Strategic production and operations management issues in product recovery management. California Management Review, 37, 114–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Laan, E.A., Dekker, R., Ridder, A.A.N., and Salomon, M. (1994) An (s,Q) inventory model with remanufacturing Dynamic lot sizing with returning items and disposals 447 and disposal. International Journal of Production Economics (in press).

  • Veinott, Jr., A.F. (1969) Minimum concave-cost solutions of Leontief substitution models of multifacility inventory systems. Operations Research, 17, 262–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagelmans, A., Van Hoesel, S. and Kolen, A. (1992) Economic lot sizing: an O(n log n) algorithm that runs in linear time in the Wagner-Whitin case. Operations Research, 40, S145–S156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H.M. and Whitin, T.M. (1958) Dynamic version of the economic lot size model. Management Science, 5, 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill, W.I. (1966) Adeterministic multi-period production scheduling model with backlogging. Management Science, 12, 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill, W.I. (1968) Minimum concave cost flows in certain networks.Management Science, 14, 429–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill, W.I. (1969) Abacklogging model and a multi-echelon model of a dynamic economic lot size production system - a network approach. Management Science, 15, 506–527.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beltrán, J.L., Krass, D. Dynamic lot sizing with returning items and disposals. IIE Transactions 34, 437–448 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013554800006

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013554800006

Keywords

Navigation