Skip to main content
Log in

Specification of Distance Functions Using Semi- and Nonparametric Methods with an Application to the Dynamic Performance of Eastern and Western European Air Carriers

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we examine the productive performance of a group of three East European carriers and compare it to thirteen of their West European competitors during the period 1977–1990. We first model the multiple output/multiple input technology with a stochastic distance frontier using recently developed semiparametric efficient methods. The endogeneity of multiple outputs is addressed in part by introducing multivariate kernel estimators for the joint distribution of the multiple outputs and potentially correlated firm random effects. We augment estimates from our semiparametric stochastic distance function with nonparametric distance function methods, using linear programming techniques, as well as with extended decomposition methods, based on the Malmquist index number. Both semi- and nonparametric methods indicate significant slack in resource utilization in the East European carriers relative to their Western counterparts, and limited convergence in efficiency or technical change between them. The implications are rather stark for the long run viability of the East European carriers in our sample.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, R. A., A. Berger and R. C. Sickles. (1999). “Semiparametric Approaches to Stochastic Panel Frontiers with Applications to the Banking Industry.” Journal of Business and Economics Statistics 17, 349-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, S., D. Good and R. C. Sickles. (1999). “Assessing the Relative Efficiency of Asian and North American Airline Firms.” In Tsu-tan Fu, Cliff J. Huang and C. A. K. Lovell (eds.), Economic Efficiency and Productivity Growth in the Asia Pacific Region. pp. 67-94. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, S., D. Good and R. C. Sickles. (2000). “Estimation of Long-Run Inefficiency Levels: A Dynamic Frontier Approach.” Econometric Reviews, Forthcoming.

  • Aghion, P. (1993). “Economic Reform in Eastern Europe.” European Economic Review 37, 525-532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, I. S. and R. C. Sickles. (2000). “Time Series Analysis of Deregulatory Dynamics and Technical Efficiency: The Case of the U.S. Airline Industry.” International Economic Review 41, 203-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avmark. (1992). The Competitiveness of the European Community's Air Transport Industry, prepared for the Commission of the European Communities.

  • Barla, P. and S. Perelman. (1989). “Technical Efficiency in Airlines under Regulated and Deregulated Environments.” Annales de l'Economie Publique Sociale et Cooperative 60, 61-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergson, A. (1987). “Comparative Productivity: The USSR, Eastern Europe, and the West.” American Economic Review 77, 342-357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, O., R. Dornbusch, P. Krugman, R. Layard and L. Summers. (1991). Reform in Eastern Europe. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjurek, H., F. R. Førsund and L. Hjalmarrson. (1997). “Malmquist Productivity Indexes: An Empirical Comparison.” In R. Färe, S. Grosskopf and R. R. Russell (eds.), Index Numbers; Essays in the Honor of Sten Malmquist. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Captain, P. and R. C. Sickles. (1997). “Competition and Market Power in the European Airline Industry: 1976-1990.” Managerial and Decision Economics 18(3), 209-225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D. W., L. R. Christensen and W. E. Diewert. (1982). “Output, Input and Productivity Using Superlative Index Numbers.” Economic Journal 92, 73-96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, D.W., L. R. Christensen and M. W. Tretheway. (1984). “Economies of Density Versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ.” The Rand Journal of Economics 15, 471-489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A. and W. W. Cooper. (1985). “Preface to Topics in Data Envelopment Analysis.” Annals of Operations Research 2, 95-112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. L. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 2, 429-444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli, T., S. Perelman and E. Romano. (1999). “Accounting for Environmental Influences in Stochastic Frontier Models with Application to International Airlines.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 11, 251-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., L. M. Seiford and K. Tone. (2000). Data Envelopment Analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coricelli, F. and G. M. Milesi-Ferretti. (1993). “A Note onWage Claims and Soft Budget Constraints in Economies in Transition.” European Economic Review 37, 387-395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C., P. Schmidt and R. C. Sickles. (1990). “Production Frontiers with Cross-Sectional and Time-Series Variation in Efficiency Levels.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 185-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewatripoint, M. and G. Roland. (1992). “The Virtues of Gradualism and Legitimacy in the Transition to a Market Economy.” Economic Journal 102, 291-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowrick, S. (1992). “Technological Catch Up and Diverging Incomes: Patterns of Economic Growth 1960-1988.” Economic Journal 102, 600-610.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Murias, R. (1990). The Economic Regulation of International Air Transport. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eads, G. C. (1972). The Local Service Airline Experiment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, B. Lindgren and P. Ross. (1992). “Productivity Changes in Swedish Pharmacies 1980-1989: A Non-Parametric Malmquist Approach.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 3, 85-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris and Z. Zhang. (1993). “Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries.” American Economic Review 84, 66-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and C. A. K. Lovell. (1994). Production Frontiers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Färe, R., S. Grosskopf and R. R. Russell (eds.). (1997). Index Numbers; Essays in the Honor of Sten Malmquist. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 120(3), 253-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Førsund, F. R. (1997). “The Malmquist Productivity Index, TFP and Scale.” Mimeo, University of Oslo.

  • Good, D. H., M. I. Nadiri, L.-H. Röller and R. C. Sickles. (1993). “Efficiency and Productivity Growth Comparisons of European and U.S. Air Carriers: A First Look at the Data.” In J. Mairesse and Z. Griliches (eds.), Journal of Productivity Analysis 4, 115-125.

  • Good, D. H., L.-H. Röller and R. C. Sickles. (1993). “U.S. Airline Deregulation: Implications for European Transport.” Economic Journal 103, 1028-1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, D. H., L.-H. Röller and R. C. Sickles. (1995). “Airline Efficiency Differences Between Europe and the U.S.: Implications for the Pace of E. C. Integration and Domestic Regulation.” European Journal of Operations Research 80, 508-518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, D. H., M. I. Nadiri and R. C. Sickles. (1997). “Index Number and Factor Demand Approaches to the Estimation of Productivity.” In M. H. Pesaran and P. Schmidt (eds.), Handbook of Applied Econometrics, Volume II-Microeconometrics, pp. 14-80. Chapter 2. Cambridge, UK: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, D. H., A. Postert and R. C. Sickles. (1997). “A Model of World Aircraft Demand.” Mimeo.

  • Grifell-Tatjé, E. and C. A. K. Lovell. (1996). “Deregulation and Productivity Decline: The Case of Spanish Savings Banks.” European Economic Review 40, 1281-1303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, G. and P. Hare. (1992), “Industrial Restructuring in Eastern Europe.” European Economic Review 36, 670-676.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultberg, P., M. I. Nadiri and R. C. Sickles. (1999). “An International Comparison of Technology Adoption and Efficiency: A Dynamic Panel Model.” In Patrik Sevestre (ed.), Annales d' Économie et de Statistique, Special Issue in Commemoration of the 20th Anniversity of the Panel Data Conference 55-56, 449-474.

  • Kaspar, D. M. (1991). Deregulation and Globalization: Liberalizing International Trade in Air Services. Cambridge MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C. A. K., S. Richardson, P. Travers and L. Wood. (1994). “Resources and Functionings: A New View of Inequality in Australia, in Models and Measurement ofWelfare and Inequality.” In W. Eichhorn (ed.), Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 787-807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroney, J. R. (1990). “Energy Consumption, Capital and Real Output: A Comparison of Market and Planned Economies.” Journal of Comparative Economics 14, 199-220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroney, J. R. and C. A. K. Lovell. (1992). “The Performance of Market and Planned Economies Revisited.” Mimeo.

  • Oum, T. H. and C. Yu. (1998). “Cost Competitiveness of Major Airlines: An International Comparison.” Transportation Research Part A 32(6), 407-422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B. and L. Simar. (1994). “Efficient Semiparametric Estimation in Stochastic Frontier Models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 89, 929-936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, B., R. C. Sickles and L. Simar. (1998). “Stochastic Panel Frontiers: A Semiparametric Approach.” Journal of Econometrics 84, 273-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, R. (1992). “Structural Reform in Central and Eastern Europe.” European Economic Review 36, 661-669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röller, L.-H. and R. C. Sickles. (2000). “Capacity and Product Market Competition: Measuring Market Power in a 'Puppy-Dog' Industry.” Forthcoming in the International Journal of Industrial Organization.

  • Roland, G. (1993). “The Political Economy of Restructuring and Privatization in Eastern Europe.” European Economic Review 37, 533-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sickles, R. C. (1985). “A Nonlinear Multivariate Error-Components Analysis of Technology and Specific Factor Productivity Growth with an Application to the U.S. Airlines.” Journal of Econometrics 27, 61-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sieford, L. and R. M. Thrall. (1990). “Recent Developments in DEA: The Mathematical Approach to Frontier Analysis.” Journal of Econometrics 46, 7-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taneja, N. K. (1988). The International Airline Industry. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. J. (1979). “Economies of Scale and the Question of Natural Monopoly in the Airline Industry.” Journal of Air Law and Commerce 44, 545-573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyploz, C. (1993). “The Transformation of Eastern Europe: Macroeconomic Issues.” European Economic Review 37, 379-386.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sickles, R.C., Good, D.H. & Getachew, L. Specification of Distance Functions Using Semi- and Nonparametric Methods with an Application to the Dynamic Performance of Eastern and Western European Air Carriers. Journal of Productivity Analysis 17, 133–155 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013592506555

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013592506555

Navigation