Skip to main content
Log in

Universal Service and Entry: The Role of Uniform Pricing and Coverage Constraints

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Universal service objectives are pervasive in telecommunications, and have gained new relevance after the introduction of competition in many markets. Despite their policy relevance, little work has been done allowing for a thorough discussion of instruments designed to achieve universal service objectives under competition. We intend to fill this gap, and disaggregate the problem into interacting forms of regulatory intervention such as uniform pricing and coverage constraints. It is shown that these are not competitively neutral and may have far-reaching strategic effects. Under uniform pricing, equilibrium coverage of both incumbent and entrant may be lower than without regulation. These effects depend on which measures are imposed at the same time, thus no single measure can be evaluated in isolation. We also point out that different groups of consumers are affected in different ways, making welfare comparisons difficult.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anton, J. J., J. H. V. Weide, and N. Vettas. 1998. “Strategic Pricing and Entry under Universal Service and Cross-Market Price Constraints.” CEPR Discussion paper 1922.

  • Armstrong, M. 2001. “Access Pricing, Bypass and Universal Service.” American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings 91(2): 297-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M., and J. Vickers. 1993. “Price Discrimination, Competition and Regulation.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 41(4): 335-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagwell, K., and A. Wolinsky. 2000. “Game Theory and Industrial Organization.” Forthcoming in Handbook of Game Theory, Vol. III, edited by Robert J. Aumann, and Sergiu Hart, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J. I., J. D. Geanakoplos, and P. D. Klemperer. 1985. “Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic substitutes and complements.” Journal of Political Economy 93: 488-511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choné, P., L. Flochel, and A. Perrot. 2000. “Universal Service Obligations and Competition.” Information Economics and Policy 12(3): 249-259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, R. W., and L. Waverman. 2000. Who Pays for Universal Service: When Telephone Subsidies Become Transparent. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, H., F. Gasmi, A. Grimaud, and J.-J. Laffont. 1998. “The Economics of Universal Service: Theory.” Washington, DC: The Economics Development Institute of the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M. A., and P. R. Kleindorfer. 1998. “Efficient Entry, Monopoly, and the Universal Service Obligation in Postal Service.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 14(2): 103-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M. A., and P. R. Kleindorfer. 2001. “Whither the USO under Competitive Entry.” In Future Directions in Postal Reform, edited by M. A. Crew, and P. R. Kleindorfer, Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • European Commission. 1996. “Comunication de la Comission: Le service universel des telecommunications dans la perspective d'un environnement pleinement liberalisé, COM(96) 73 Final.” Bruxelles.

  • FCC. 1996. “In the Matter of Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service.” CC Docket, no. 96-45, November 8, Washington, DC.

  • Hoernig, S. 2001. “Universal Service Obligations: Should They Be Imposed on Entrants?” Mimeo, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal.

  • Laffont, J.-J., and J. Tirole. 2000. Competition in Telecommunications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, M. L. Jr. 1997. Universal Service: Competition, Interconnection, and Monopoly in the Making of the American Telephone System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press and AEI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronnen, U. 1991. “Minimum Quality Standards, Fixed Costs, and Competition.” RAND Journal of Economics 22(4): 490-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosston, G. L., and B. S. Wimmer. 2000. “The ‘state’ of Universal Service.” Information Economics and Policy 12(3): 261-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, N., and X. Vives. 1984. “Price and Quantity Competition in a Differentiated Duopoly.” Rand Journal of Economics 15(4): 546-554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valletti, T. M. 2000. “Minimum Quality Standards under Cournot Competition.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 18(3): 235-245.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tommaso M. Valletti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valletti, T.M., Hoernig, S. & Barros, P.P. Universal Service and Entry: The Role of Uniform Pricing and Coverage Constraints. Journal of Regulatory Economics 21, 169–190 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014387707275

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014387707275

Keywords

Navigation