Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dueling Experiences and Dual Ambivalences: Emotional and Motivational Ambivalence of Women in High Status Positions

  • Published:
Motivation and Emotion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A laboratory study demonstrates that women in high status positions experience emotional ambivalence (simultaneous experience of positive and negative affect) and motivational ambivalence (simultaneous desires to build relationships and display power). These effects were found with 2 different measures of ambivalence, 1 derived from the attitudinal ambivalence literature and the other from the structure of affect literature. These findings have implications about the experience of women in the workplace, as well as the current debates concerning structure of affect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguinis, H., & Adams, S. K. R. (1998). Social-role versus structural models of gender and influence use in organizations. Group and Organization Management, 23, 414–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayes, M., & Newton, P. M. (1978). Women in authority: A sociopsychological analysis. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 14, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonanno, G. A., Notarius, C. I., Gunzerath, L., Keltner, D., & Horowitz, M. J. (1998). Interpersonal ambivalence, perceived relationship adjustment, and conjugal loss. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 1012–1022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., & Berntson, G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K., & Lewis, L. L. (1984). Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 991–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., & Iran-Nejad, A. (1986). The relationship in experience between various types of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1031–1038.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R. J., & Myerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, L. A. (1995). Valence focus and arousal focus: Individual differences in the structure of affective experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 153–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1998). Independence and bipolarity in the structure of current affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 967–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Barrett, L., & Russell, J. A. (1999). The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. P., & Citrin, J. (1994). Measurement error and the structure of attitudes: Are positive and negative judgments opposites? American Journal of Political Science, 38, 256–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. P., Goldman, S. L., & Salovey, P. (1993). Measurement error masks bipolarity in affect ratings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1029–1041.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. P., & Salovey, P. (1999). In what sense are positive and negative affect independent?: A reply to Tellegen, Watson & Clark. Psychological Science, 10, 304–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A. (1993). Changing the status of women in management [Special Issue]. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42, 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. T. (1972). A model for coping with role conflict: The role behavior of college educated women. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 471–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, P. (1992). Hardball for women: Winning at the game of business. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. R., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horney, K. (1967). Feminine psychology. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, T. A., Cacioppo, J. T., & Lang, P. J. (1998). Eliciting affect using the International Affective Picture System: Trajectories through evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 855–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, K. H. (1995). Beyond the double bind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N., & Oatley, K. (1992). Basic emotions, rationality, and folk theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 201–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL (Version 8.03) [Computer software]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D., & Anderson, C. (in press). The experience of power and its effects on feeling, thought and action. Psychological Review.

  • Kinder, D. R. (1994). Reason and emotion in American political life. In R. P. Abelson, R. C. Schank, & E. Langer (Eds.), Beliefs, reasoning, and decision making: Psycho-logic in honor of Bob Abelson (pp. 277–314.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonner, W. J. (1980). The search for psychological universals. In H. C. Triandis & W. W. Lambert (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 143–204.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., & Meyerson, D. (1998). Women and power: Conformity, resistance, and disorganized coaction. In R. M. Kramer & M. A. Neale (Eds.), Power and influence in organizations (pp. 311–348.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J., Price, R. L., Bies, R. J., & Powers, M. E. (1987). Now that I can have it, I'm not sure I want it: The effects of opportunity on aspirations and discontent. In B. A. Gutek & L. Larwood (Eds.), Womens' career development (pp. 42–65.) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1985). Human motivation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D. E., & Scully, M. A. (1995). Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science, 6, 585–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Leary, V. E. (1974). Some attitudinal barriers to occupational aspiration in women. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 809–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G., & Doucet, L. (2000). Ambivalent feelings in organizational relationships. In S. Feinman (Ed.), Emotion in organizations (2nd ed). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 431–449.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989). Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 51–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richeson, J. A., & Ambady, N. (2001). When roles reverse: Stigma, status & self-evaluation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1350–1377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999). On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 3–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1985). Emotions can be rational. Social Science Information, 24, 331–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigel, R. S. (1996). Ambition and accommodation: How women view gender relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, R. (1994). Conceptual development in the psychoanalytic theory of affects: II. Clinical and theoretical applications. Israel Journal of Psychotherapy, 9, 6–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellegen, A., Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). Further support for a hierarchical model of affect: Reply to Green and Salovey. Psychological Science, 10, 307–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let's not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386.) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmers, M., Fischer, A. H., & Manstead, A. S. (1998). Gender differences in motives for regulating emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 974–985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. H. (1964). Some aspects of women's ambition. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 271–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta analysis. Sex Roles, 36, 305–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1992). Affects separable and inseparable: On the hierarchical arrangement of the negative affects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1997). Measurement and mismeasurement of mood: Recurrent and emergent issues. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 267–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woike, B., Gershkovich, I., Piorkowski, R., & Polo, M. (1999). The role of motives in the content and structure of autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 600–612.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, W., Christensen, P. M., Hebl, M. R., & Rothberger, H. (1997). Conformity to sex-typed norms, affect and the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 523–535.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zautra, A. J., Potter, P. T., & Reich, J. W. (1998). The independence of affects is context-dependent: An integrative model of the relationship between positive and negative affect. In K. W. Schaie & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: Focus on emotion and adult development (Vol. 17, pp. 75–103.) New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California

    Christina T. Fong & Larissa Z. Tiedens

Authors
  1. Christina T. Fong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Larissa Z. Tiedens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fong, C.T., Tiedens, L.Z. Dueling Experiences and Dual Ambivalences: Emotional and Motivational Ambivalence of Women in High Status Positions. Motivation and Emotion 26, 105–121 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015198209285

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015198209285

Search

Navigation