Skip to main content
Log in

Quadratic and Higher-Order Constraints in Energy-Conserving Formulations of Flexible Multibody Systems

  • Published:
Multibody System Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The treatment of constraints is considered here within the framework ofenergy-momentum conserving formulations for flexible multibody systems.Constraint equations of various types are an inherent component of multibodysystems, their treatment being one of the key performance features ofmathematical formulations and numerical solution schemes.

Here we employ rotation-free inertial Cartesian coordinates of points tocharacterise such systems, producing a formulation which easily couples rigidbody dynamics with nonlinear finite element techniques for the flexiblebodies. This gives rise to additional internal constraints in rigid bodies topreserve distances. Constraints are enforced via a penalty method, which givesrise to a simple yet powerful formulation. Energy-momentum time integrationschemes enable robust long term simulations for highly nonlinear dynamicproblems.

The main contribution of this paper focuses on the integration of constraintequations within energy-momentum conserving numerical schemes. It is shownthat the solution for constraints which may be expressed directly in terms ofquadratic invariants is fairly straightforward. Higher-order constraints mayalso be solved, however in this case for exact conservation an iterativeprocedure is needed in the integration scheme. This approach, together withsome simplified alternatives, is discussed.

Representative numerical simulations are presented, comparing the performanceof various integration procedures in long-term simulations of practicalmultibody systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Armero, F. and Petöcz, E., ‘On the formulation of stable time-stepping algorithms for contact problems’ in Computational Plasticity-Fundamentals and Applications, D.R.J. Owen, E. Oñate and E. Hinton (eds), CIMNE, 1997, 865-872.

  2. Bathe, K.-J., Finite Element Procedures Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cardona, A., Geradin, M. and Doan, D., ‘Rigid and flexible joint modelling in multibody dynamics using finite elements’, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 89, 1991, 395-418.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, A., ‘Energy-momentum conserving methods fir three dimensional dynamic nonlinear multibody systems’ Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 1998 (also SUDMC Report 98-01).

  5. Crisfield, M., Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures, Vols. I and II, Wiley, New York, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crisfield, M. and Jelenic, G., ‘An invariant energy-momentum conserving procedure for dynamics of 3D beams’ in Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Computational Mechanics-New Trends and Applications, S. Idelsohn, E. Oñate and E.N. Doorlein (eds), CIMNE, 1998.

  7. Eich-Soellner, E. and Führer, C., Numerical Methods in Multibody Dynamics, B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferreira, C., ‘Simulacion dinámica de mecanismos tridimensionales con elementos flexibles’, Ph.D. Thesis, Centro Politécnico Superior de la Universidad de Zaragoza, 1997.

  9. García de Jalón, J. and Bayo, E., Kinematic and Dynamic Simulation of Multibody Systems. The Real Time Challenge, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. García Orden, J., ‘Dinámica no lineal de sistemas multicuerpo flexibles mediante algoritmos conservativos’, Ph.D. Thesis, E.T.S.I. Caminos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 1999.

  11. García Orden, J. and Goicolea, J., ‘Non-frictional contacts in multibody dynamics with conserving schemes’ in European Conference on Computational Mechanics, Munich, Germany, W. Wunderlich (ed.), Lehrstuhl für Statik, T.U. München, 1999, 74-75.

    Google Scholar 

  12. García Orden, J. and Goicolea, J., ‘Conserving properties in constrained dynamics of flexible multibody systems’ Multibody System Dynamics 4(2/3), 2000, 225-244.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goicolea, J. and Orden, G.G., ‘Dynamic analysis of rigid and deformable multibody systems with penalty methods and energy-momentum schemes’ Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 188(4), 2000, 789-804.

    Google Scholar 

  14. González, O., ‘Design and analysis of conserving integrators for nonlinear hamiltonian systems with symmetry’ Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 1996.

  15. González, O. and Simó, J., ‘On the stability of symplectic and energy-momentum algorithms for non linear hamiltonian systems with symmetry’ Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 134, 1996, 197-222.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ibrahimbegovic, A., Mamouri, S., Taylor, R. and Chen, A., ‘Finite element method in dynamics of flexible multibody systems: Modelling of holonomic constraints and energy conserving integration schemes’ Multibody System Dynamics 4(2/3), 2000, 195-223.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jelenic, G. and Crisfield, M., ‘Non-linear master-slave relationships for joints in 3-D beams with large rotations’ Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 135, 1996, 211-228.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jelenic, G. and Crisfield, M.,, ‘Geometrically exact 3d beam theory: Implementation of a strain invariant finite element for statics and dynamics’ Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 171, 1999, 141-171.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jelenic, G. and Crisfield, M., ‘Dynamic analysis of 3D beams with joints in the presence of large rotations’ Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 190, 2001, 4195-4230.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Laursen, T. and Chawla, V., ‘Design of energy conserving algorithms for frictionless dynamic contact problems’ International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 40, 1997, 863-886.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simó, J. and Doblaré, M., ‘Momentum and energy-conserving algorithms for the dynamics of three-dimensional geometrically-exact rods’ Sudam Report No. 90-1, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 1990.

  22. Simó, J. and González, O., ‘Assesment of energy-momentum and symplectic schemes for stiff dynamical systems’ in ASME Winter Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, ASME, New York, 1993.

  23. Simó, J. and Tarnow, N., ‘The discrete energy-momentum method. Conserving algorithms for nonlinear elastodynamics’ Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik (ZAMP) 43, 1992, 757-793.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Simó, J., Tarnow, N. and Wong, K., ‘Exact energy-momentum conserving algorithms and symplectic schemes for non-linear dynamics’ Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 100, 1992, 63-116.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Simó, J. and Wong, K., ‘Unconditionally stable algorithms for rigid body dynamics that exactly preserve energy and momentum’ International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering 31, 1991, 19-52.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taylor, R., ‘Finite element analysis of rigid-flexible systems’. in Computational Aspects of Nonlinear Structural Systems with Large Rigid BodyMotion, J. Ambrosio andM.Kleiber (eds), IDMEC, 2001, 63-84.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goicolea, J.M., García Orden, J.C. Quadratic and Higher-Order Constraints in Energy-Conserving Formulations of Flexible Multibody Systems. Multibody System Dynamics 7, 3–29 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015292531469

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015292531469

Navigation