Abstract
Recent rulings of the European Court of Justice show a trend towards a virtual European health-care basket. Four developments underlie this trend. First, the competence of the European Union seems to mature in the field of health care. Secondly, through a variety of authorisation procedures, individual Member States can to a large extent determine the conditions for cross border care. Thirdly, recent court cases indicate that the co-ordination of cross border care increasingly becomes a EU matter. Finally, in particular border regions, more flexible procedures for cross border care are being developed. An analysis of these developments from an (economic) institutional/constitutional point of view shows that potential Pareto-improvements can be expected from recent changes. These improvements depend on the institutional/constitutional framework into which these rules and engagements are embedded. Our analysis suggests that, although the current (increasing) role for the EU seems desirable, diminishing the role that individual Member States can play is not. National authorisation procedures, local/regional arrangements and flexible rulings are mechanisms that can secure an efficient level of output and an optimal size of the jurisdiction responsible for cross border care. This leads to the following recommendations:
• Current authorisation procedures (which differ per Member State) have to be maintained in order to secure an optimal community size for cross border services and goods;
• Bilateral agreements and flexible procedures in cross border regions should be stimulated in order to adapt institutional arrangements to the demand for cross border care by (a group of) individuals.
• The increased competency of the EU in the field of health care can best be used to make authorisation procedures more consistent and stimulate regional cross border care arrangements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. (1963). “Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care.” The American Economic Review. 53(5),941–973.
Belcher, P. J. (1999). The Role of the European Union in Healthcare, Zoetermeer: Council for Health and Social Service.
Belcher, P. J. (2001). “Health in Other EU Policies or an EU Health Policy?” Eurohealth. 7(4), 1.
Brennan, G. & Buchanan, J.M. (1980). The Power to Tax. Analytical Foundations of a Fiscal Constitution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, J. M.(1965). “An Economic Theory of Clubs.” Economica. 32, 1–14.
Byrne, D. (2001). “Public Health in the European Union.Breaking Down Barriers.” Eurohealth. 7(4), 2.
Coheur, A. (2001). “Integrating Care in the Border Regions. An Analysis of theEuregio Projects.” Eurohealth. 7(4), 10–12.
European Court of Justice (28 April 1998). Case C-120/95; Nicolas Decker andCaisse de Maladie des Employés Privés.
European Court of Justice (28 April 1998). Case C-158/96; Raymond Kohll andUnion des Caisses de Maladie.
European Treaty (27 March 1957 (last update 2 October 1997)). Consolidated Versions of the Treatyestablishing the European Community.
Evers, S., Paulus, A., & Boonen, A. (2001). “Integrated Care Across Borders: Possibilities andComplexities.” International Journal of Integrated Care (IJIC). 1(4).
Folland, S., Goodman, A. C., & Stano, M. (1997). TheEconomics of Health and Health Care, 2nd edn. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Hermesse, J. (1999). “Opening up the NationalBorders to Patients. The Economic Consequences.” In Health Care without Frontiers within the European Union? Free Movement of Goods and Services in the Healthcare Sector, International Symposium, Luxemburg November 18 (Proceedings published February, 1999).
Mc Kee, M. (1996).In L. J. Gunning-Schepers, G. J. Kronjee, & R. A. Spasoff (eds.), The Influence of Europe on National Health Policy in Fundamental Questions About the Future of Health Care.
Mossialos, E., Mckee, M. et al. (1997). “Health Care and the Single Market (editorial).”European Journal of Public Health. 7, 235–237.
Mossialos, E., Mckee, M., Palm, W., Karl, B., & Marhold, F. (2001). TheInfluence of EU Law on the Social Character of Health Care Systems in the European Union. Brussels: Report submitted to the Belgian Presidency of the European Union, Final Version, November 19, 2001.
Nickles, J. (2001). “Smits/Peerbooms: Clarification of Kohll and Decker?”Eurohealth. 7(4), 7–10.
Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
Palm, W., Nickless, J., Lewalle, H., & Coheur, A. (2000). Implications of Recent Jurisprudence on the Co-Ordination of Health Care Protection Systems, Bruxelles: AIM.
Paulus, A. (1995). The Feasibility of Ecological Taxation, Antwerpen/Apeldoorn: Maklu Uitgevers (Law andEconomics series).
Paulus, A., Van Raak, A., van Merode, F., & Adang, E. (2000). “Integrated Health Care from an Economic Point ofView.” Journal of Economic Studies. 27(3), 200–209.
Regulation 1408/71 (1971). (Article 22). Official Journal of theEuropean Communities. 71/L, 149.
Sedgley, M. (2001). “Smits/Peerbooms: A Clarification of Confusion?” Eurohealth. 7(4),(Editorial Comment).
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy. 64, 416–424.
van der Mei, A. P. (1999). The European Court of Justice and the Co-Ordination of Health Insurance Schemes. Health Care without Frontiers within the European, The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers.
Williamson, O. E. (1993). Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory,Berkeley: University of California, unpublished manuscript (February).
Wismar, M. (2001). “ECJ in the Driving Seat on Health Policy. ButWhat' the Destination?” Eurohealth. 7(4), 5–6.
Wolfson, D. J. (1988). Publieke sector en economische orde,Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.
Ziekenfondsraad (1999). Grensoverschrijdende zorgproject Zorg op Maat.Amstelveen: Ziekenfondsraad.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paulus, A., Evers, S., Fecher, F. et al. Cross Border Health Care: An Analysis of Recent ECJ Rulings. European Journal of Law and Economics 14, 61–73 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015642601282
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015642601282