Skip to main content
Log in

Heterogeneity in Returns to Scale: A Random Coefficient Analysis with Unbalanced Panel Data

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyses the importance of scale economies by means of unbalanced plant-level panel data from three Norwegian manufacturing industries. Focus is on heterogeneous technologies, and unlike most previous work on micro data, the model description includes heterogeneity in both the scale properties (the slope coefficients) and the intercept term, represented by random coefficients in the production function. Three (nested) functional forms are investigated: the Translog, an extended Cobb-Douglas, and the strict Cobb-Douglas. Although constant or moderately increasing returns to scale is found for the average plant, the results reveal considerable variation across plants. Variations in both input and scale elasticities are to a larger extent due to randomness of the production function parameters than to systematic differences in the input mix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amemiya, Y. (1994). “On Multivariate Mixed Model Analysis.” Multivariate Analysis and its Applications. IMS Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, vol. 24, pp. 83-95.

  • Andrews, D. W. K. (1999). “Estimation when a Parameter is on a Boundary.” Econometrica 67, 1341-1383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H. and Y. Chang. (1994). “Incomplete Panels: A Comparative Study of Alternative Estimators for the Unbalanced One-Way Error Component Regression Model.” Journal of Econometrics 62, 67-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biørn, E. (1999). “Random Coefficients in Regression Equation Systems: The Case with Unbalanced Panel Data.” Memorandum No. 27/1999, Department of Economics, University of Oslo.

  • Biørn, E., K.-G. Lindquist and T. Skjerpen. (2000a). “Heterogeneity in Returns to Scale: A Random Coefficient Analysis with Unbalanced Panel Data.” Discussion Paper No. 292, Statistics Norway.

  • Biørn, E., K.-G. Lindquist and T. Skjerpen. (2000b). “Micro Data on Capital Inputs: Attempts to Reconcile Stock and Flow Information.” Discussion Paper No. 268, Statistics Norway.

  • Biørn, E., K.-G. Lindquist and T. Skjerpen. (2003). “Random Coefficients and Unbalanced Panels: An Application on Data from Norwegian Chemical Plants.”

  • Cornwell, C. and P. Schmidt. (1996). “Production Frontiers and Efficiency Measurement.” In L. Mátyás and P. Sevestre (eds.), The Econometrics of Panel Data. Handbook of the Theory with Applications, Chap. 32. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, W. E. and J. R. Anderson. (1982). “Using Time-Series and Cross-Section Data to Estimate a Production Function with Positive and Negative Marginal Risks.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 77, 529-536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. and J. Mairesse. (1998). “Production Functions: The Search for Identification.” In S. Strøm (ed.), Econometrics and Economic Theory in the 20th Century. The Ragnar Frisch Centennial Symposium, Chap. 6. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (1975). “Some Estimation Methods for a Random Coefficient Model.” Econometrica 43, 305-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. (1996). “Random Coefficients Models.” In L. Mátyás and P. Sevestre (eds.), The Econometrics of Panel Data. Handbook of the Theory with Applications, Chap. 5. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, G. G., R. C. Hill, W. E. Griffiths, H. Lütkepohl and T.-C. Lee. (1985). The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khuri, A. I., T. Mathew and B. K. Sinha. (1998). Statistical Tests for Mixed Linear Models. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klette, T. J. and Z. Griliches. (1996). “The Inconsistency of Common Scale Estimators when Output Prices are Unobserved and Endogenous.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 11, 343-361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. F. and W. E. Griffiths. (1979). “The Prior Likelihood and Best Unbiased Prediction in Stochastic Coefficient Linear Models.” Working Papers in Econometrics and Applied Statistics No. 1. Department of Economic Statistics, University of New England.

  • Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W.W. Stroup and R. D. Wolfinger. (1996). SAS System for Mixed Models. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longford, N. T. (1995a). Random Coefficient Models. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longford, N. T. (1995b). “Random Coefficient Models.” In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg and M. E. Sobel. (eds.), Handbook of Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Chap. 10. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J. (1990). “Time-Series and Cross-Sectional Estimates on Panel Data: Why are they Different and Why Should they be Equal?” In J. Hartog, G. Ridder and J. Theeuwes (eds.), Panel Data and Labor Market Studies. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 81-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mairesse, J. and Z. Griliches. (1990). “Heterogeneity in Panel Data: Are There Stable Production Functions?” In P. Champsaur, et al. (eds.), Essays in Honor of Edmond Malinvaud, vol. 3, Chap. 33, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mátyás, L. and L. Lovrics. (1991). “Missing Observations and Panel Data: A Monte-Carlo Analysis.” Economics Letters 37, 39-44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, C. (1988). “Quasi-Fixed Inputs in U.S. and Japanese Manufacturing: A Generalized Leontief Restricted Cost Function Approach.” Review of Economics and Statistics 70, 275-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundlak, Y. (1996). “Production Function Estimation: Reviving the Primal.” Econometrica 64, 431-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, C. (1995). “On the Multivariate Random Coefficient Model.” American Statistical Association: 1995 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, pp. 320-325.

  • Statistics Norway. (1995). Energy Statistics 1995, Official Statistics of Norway NOS C 347.

  • Swamy, P. A. V. B. (1970). “Efficient Estimation in a Random Coefficient Regression Model.” Econometrica 38, 311-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, P. A. V. B. (1971). Statistical Inference in Random Coefficient Regression Models. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swamy, P. A. V. B. (1974). “Linear Models with Random Coefficients.” In P. Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. Chap. 5. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J. (1989). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, M. and T. E. Nijman. (1996). “Incomplete Panels and Selection Bias.” In L. Mátyás and P. Sevestre (eds.), The Econometrics of Panel Data. A Handbook of the Theory with Applications. Chap. 18. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan, G. H., W. E. Griffiths and J. R. Anderson. (1992). “Using Panel Data to Estimate Risk Effects in Seemingly Unrelated Production Functions.” Empirical Economics 17, 35-49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A., J. Kmenta and J. Drèze. (1966). “Specification and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Function Models.” Econometrica 34, 784-795.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biørn, E., Lindquist, KG. & Skjerpen, T. Heterogeneity in Returns to Scale: A Random Coefficient Analysis with Unbalanced Panel Data. Journal of Productivity Analysis 18, 39–57 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015752426200

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015752426200

Navigation