Skip to main content
Log in

Small-Group, Multi-Level Democracy: Implications of Austrian Public Choice for Governance Structure

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the process of mass democracy as the fundamental cause of transfer seeking and the centralization of governance, using Austrian-school theory and methodology such as decentralized knowledge, disaggregated phenomena, and the structure of capital goods. The alternative of decentralized, small-group governance reduces the demand for campaign financing and makes more effective use of decentralized knowledge. In addition, when public revenues originate in the local districts and are passed on to higher levels of governance, it provides incentives for revenue sources which do not have an excess burden on production. The governance structure of cellular, bottom-up, multi-level voting, with public revenue flowing up from the lower to the upper levels, provides a contrast for a comparative systems analysis that can yield insight into the transfer seeking endemic in mass democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aranson, P. (1985) “Judicial Control of the Political Branches: Public Purpose and Public Law.” Cato Journal, 4 (Winter): 719-782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aranson, P. (1987) “Procedural and Substantive Constitutional Protection of Economic Liberties.” Cato Journal, 7 (Fall): 345-375. Also in Gwartney, J. D. andWagner, R. E. (Eds.) Public Choice and Constitutional Economics, pp. 285-313. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beito, D. (2000) From Mutual Aid to the Welfare State: Fraternal Societies and Social Services, 1890-1967. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. J. (1994) “Virginia Political Economy: A View from Vienna.” In: Boettke, P. J. and Prychitko, D. L. (Eds.) The Market Process, pp. 244-260. Brookfield VT: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. [1988 (1986)] “The Constitution of Economic Policy.” In: Gwartney, J. D. and Wagner, R. E. (Eds.) Public Choice and Constitutional Economics, pp. 103-114. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press (Nobel Prize Lecture, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. and Goetz, C. J. (1972) “Efficiency Limits of Fiscal Mobility.” Journal of Public Economics, 1: 25-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. M. and Tullock, G. (1962) The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisolm, D. (1989) Coordination without Hierarchy: Informal Structures in Multiorganizational Systems. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Seattle (2001) Available at http://www.ci.seattle.wa.us/don/homt.htm.

  • City of St. Paul (2001) Available at http://www.stpaul.gov/neighborhoods.

  • Cordato, R. E. (1994) “Taxation.” In: Boettke, Peter J. (Ed.) The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics, pp. 378-381. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1927) The Public and Its Problems. New York: H. Holt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foldvary, F. E. (1980) The Soul of Liberty. San Francisco: The Gutenberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foldvary, F. E. (1994) Public Goods and Private Communities. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney, J. D. and Wagner, R. E. (1988) “Public Choice and the Conduct of Representative Government.” In: Gwartney, J. D. and Wagner, R. E. (Eds.) Public Choice and Constitutional Economics, pp. 3-28. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. (1945) “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” American Economic Review, 35(4): 519-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasay, A. de. (1994) “Public Goods Theory.” In: Boettke, Peter J. (Ed.) The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics, pp. 276-284. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, T. [1984 (1816)] Letter to Kercheval, July 12, 1816. In: Peterson, Merrill (Ed.) Writings: Thomas Jefferson. New York: Library of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, J. [1947 (1690)] Two Treatises of Government. Cook, T. I. (Ed.) New York: Hafner Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. C. (1979) Public Choice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. H. (1989) “The Privatization of Local Government: From Zoning to RCAs.” In: Dean, D. (Ed.) Residential Community Associations: Private Governments in the Intergovernmental System? pp. 45-52. Washington DC: ACIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, C. K. (1994) “Public Choice Economics.” In: Boettke, P. J. (Ed.) The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics, pp. 285-293. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. [1982 (1790)] The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tideman, T. N. (Ed.) (1994) Land and Taxation. London: Shepheard-Walwyn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. (1956) “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditure.” Journal of Political Economy, 64: 416-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, Alexis de [1981 (1845)] Democracy in America. New York: Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1994) The New Federalist. Vancouver, B.C.: Fraser Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R. E. and Gwartney, J. D. (1988) “Public Choice and Constitutional Order.” In: Gwartney, J. D. and Wagner, R. E. (Eds.) Public Choice and Constitutional Economics, pp. 29-56. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, J. (1994) “Economics, Subjectivism and Public Choice.” In: Boettke, P. J. and Prychitko, D. L. (Eds.) The Market Process, pp. 126-130. Brookfield VT: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foldvary, F.E. Small-Group, Multi-Level Democracy: Implications of Austrian Public Choice for Governance Structure. The Review of Austrian Economics 15, 161–174 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015762504055

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015762504055

Navigation