Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in conservation assessments of exposed riverine sediment habitats in Scotland and northern England

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exposed riverine sediments (ERS) are an important invertebrate habitat. Ground beetle data from pitfall trap surveys of 165 sites in the catchments of the Rivers Carron, Nith, Spey, Tweed and Eden and from 48 sites in the catchments of the Rivers Blyth, Breamish, Coquet, Glen, Pont, South Tyne, Till, Tweed and Tyne were used to produce ERS habitat classifications in Scotland and northern England respectively. Within each habitat type the quality of sites were assessed using indices based on rarity and fidelity values and using species richness as a measure of diversity. Considerable variation in these indices was seen within and between habitat types, showing potential for their use in assessing site quality and for ranking sites within habitats. The use of standardised invertebrate survey and distribution data, together with species assemblage information, for the conservation of invertebrate habitat types as an alternative to the use of selected ‘indicator species’, is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen J. 1978.The influence of the substratum on the habitat selection of Bembidiini (Col., Carabidae).Norw. J. Entomol. 25:119–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen J. 1983. The habitat distribution of species of the tribe Bembidiini (Coleoptera, Carabidae) on banks and shores in northern Norway.Notulae Entomologicae63:131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R., Nash R. and O'Connor J.P. 1997. Irish Coleoptera. A revised and annotated list. Ir. Natural. J. Special Entomol. Supplement:1–81.

  • Archer M.E. 1995.Aculeate wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of Blaxton Common in Watsonian Yorkshire with the introduction of a new national quality scoring system.Naturalist 120:21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer M.E. 1996. The aculeate wasps and bees (Hym., Aculeata) of Sherwood Forest in Nottinghamshire and the development of a national quality assessment scheme.Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 132:35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer M.E. and Burn J.T. 1996. The aculeate wasps and bees of Crow Wood, Finningley in Watsonian Yorkshire, with the introduction of a new national quality scoring system.Br. J. Entomol. Nat. Hist. 8: 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth A.C. 1996.The response of arctic Carabidae (Coleoptera) to climate change based on the fossil record of the Quaternary period. Annales Zoologici Fennici33:125–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson T.C., Briffa K.R. and Coope G.R. 1987.Seasonal temperatures in Britain during the past 22,000 years, reconstructed using beetle remains.Nature (London) 325:587–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J.C. 1981. Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Algorithms. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigot L. and Gautier G. 1982. La communauté des arthropodes des Rives de l'Ouvèze (Vaucluse). Ecologia Mediterranea8:11–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boumezzough A. 1983.Les communautés animales ripicoles du bassin versant de la rivière Aille (Var-France): II) Composition et structure de la faune épiigée.Ecologia Mediterranea9:3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coope G.R. 1987. The response of late Quaternary insect communities to sudden climatic change. In: Gee J.H.R. and Giller P.S. (eds), Organisation of Communities Past Present.Blackwell Scientific Publications, London, pp. 421–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coope G.R. and Wilkins A.S. 1994. The response of insect faunas to glacial-interglacial climatic fluctuations.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B344: 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Environment 1995. Biodiversity: The UK Steering Group Report. 2: Action Plans. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake M., Clements D., Eyre M., Gibbs D. and Kirby P. 1998. Invertebrates and their habitats in Natural Areas. Volume 1, Midland and Northern Areas; Volume 2, Southern Areas.English Nature Research Reports, No. 298. English Nature, Peterborough.

  • Edwards R. (ed.) 1997. Provisional Atlas of the Aculeate Hymenoptera of Britain and Ireland. Part 1. Biological Records Centre, Huntingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards R. (ed.) 1998.Provisional Atlas of the Aculeate Hymenoptera of Britain and Ireland. Part 2. Biological Records Centre, Huntingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M.D. 1998. Invertebrates and the environment: a time for reassessment? Antenna22:63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M.D., Ball S.G. and Foster G.N. 1985. An Atlas of the Water Beetles of Northumberland and County Durham.Hancock Museum, Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M.D., Ball S.G. and Foster G.N. 1986b. An initial classification of the habitats of aquatic Coleoptera in North East England. J. App. Ecol.23:841–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M.D. and Lott D.A. 1997. Invertebrates of Exposed Riverine Sediments.R&D Technical ReportW11, pp.93 and R&D Project Record W1/i525/1. Environment Agency, Bristol, pp. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M.D., Lott D.A. and Garside A. 1996.Assessing the potential for environmental monitoring using ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) with riverside and Scottish data.Annales Zoologici Fennici33:157–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M.D., Luff M.L. and Ball S.G. 1986a. An Atlas of the Carabidae (ground beetles) of Northumberland and County Durham. Hancock Museum, Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M.D., Luff M.L. and Lott D.A. 1998. Rare and notable beetle species records from Scotland from survey work with pitfall traps, 1992-1996. Coleopterist7:81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M.D., Luff M.L. and Lott D.A. 2000.Records of rare and notable beetle species from riverine sediments in Scotland and northern England.Coleopterist 9:25–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M.D., Luff M.L. and Phillips D.A. 2001. The ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of exposed riverine sediments in Scotland and northern England.Biodiv. Cons.10:403–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre M.D. and Rushton S.P. 1989.Quantification of conservation criteria using invertebrates.J. App. Ecol.26:159–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster G.N. 1987. The use of Coleoptera records in assessing the conservation value of wetlands. In: Luff M.L. (ed.), The Use of Invertebrate Community Data in Environmental Assessment. Agricultural Environment Research Group, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp.8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster G.N. and Eyre M.D. 1992. Classification and ranking of water beetle communities.UK Nature Conservation. Vol. 1. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough,1–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster G.N., Foster A.P., Eyre M.D. and Bilton D.T. 1990. Classi-fication of water beetle assemblages in arable fenland and ranking of sites in relation to conservation value.Freshwater Biol. 22:343–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster G.N., Nelson B.H., Bilton D.T., Lott D.A., Merritt R., Weyl R.S. et al. 1992. A classification and evaluation of Irish water beetle assemblages.Aquatic Conservation, Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems2:195–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles A.P. 1989.The Coleoptera of shingle banks in the River Ystwyth, Dyfed.Entomologist's Record and Journal of Variation 101: 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles A.P. 1994.Invertebrates of Wales: a review of important sites and species. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles A.P. 1997. The Saproxylic Quality Index: an evaluation of dead wood habitats based on rarity scores, with examples from Wales.Coleopterist 6:61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles A.P., Alexander K.N.A. and Key R.S. 1999. The Saproxylic Quality Index: evaluating wooded habitats for the conservation of dead-wood Coleoptera.Coleopterist8:121–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill M.O. 1979a. DECORANA-A FORTRAN program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes P.R., Boyce D.C. and Reed D.K. 1993.The ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) fauna of Welsh peatland biotypes: factors influencing the distribution of ground beetles and conservation implications. Biol. Cons.63:153–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höppner J. and Hering D. 1997. Uferbewohnende laufkäfer auf schotterbänken von fliessgewässern des östlichen Rheinischen Schiefergebirges. Entomologische Zeitschrift107:465–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman P.S. and Parsons M.S. 1992. A review of the scarce and threatened Coleoptera of Great Britain. Part 1. UK Nature Conservation 3:1-484.Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman P.S. and Parsons M.S. 1994. A review of the scarce and threatened Coleoptera of Great Britain. Part 2.UK Nature Conservation, 12:1-248.Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luff M.L. 1996. Environmental assessments using ground beetles (Carabidae) and pitfall traps. In: Eyre M.D. (ed.), Environmental Monitoring, Surveillance and Conservation using Invertebrates. EMS Publications, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp.42–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luff M.L. 1998. Provisional Atlas of the Ground Beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of Britain. Biological Records Centre, Huntingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luff M.L., Eyre M.D. and Rushton S.P. 1989. Classification and ordination of habitats of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in north-east England.J. Biog. 16: 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luff M.L., Eyre M.D. and Rushton S.P. 1992. Classification and prediction of grassland habitats using ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). J. Env. Manag.35:301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyszkowski R.M. and Owen J.A. 2000. Specialist riparian beetles from riversides in Upper Strathspey, Scotland.Entomologist's Gazette 51: 133–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plachter H. 1986.Composition of the carabid beetle fauna of natural riverbanks and of man-made secondary habitats. In: den Boer P.J., Luff M.L., Mossakowski D. and Weber F. (eds), Carabid Beetles, Their Adaptations and Dynamics.Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, pp. 509–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope R.D. 1977.A checklist of British insects. In: Kloet G.S. and Hincks W.D. (eds), Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects. Vol. 11., pp. 1–105.

  • Ratcliffe D.A. (ed.) 1977. A Nature Conservation Review.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe D.A. 1986.Selection of important areas for wildlife conservation in Great Britain: the Nature Conservancy Council approach. In: Usher M.B. (ed.),Wildlife Conservation Evaluation. Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 135–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • RSPB, NRA and RSNC 1995. The New Rivers & Wildlife Handbook. Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy.

  • Rushton S.P., Eyre M.D. and Luff M.L. 1990. The effects of different scrub management regimes on the ground beetle fauna of oolitic limestone grassland at Castor Hanglands National Nature Reserve, Cambridgeshire, U.K. Biol. Cons.51:97–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivell S. and Phillips D.S. 1999. Local Biodiversity Plans - Technical Information on Species III. Invertebrate Animals.Scottish Natural Heritage Review, No. 5, 1–97.

  • Spence J.R. and Niemalä J.K. 1994.Sampling carabid assemblages with pitfall traps - the madness and the method.Can. Entomol. 126:881–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Biodiversity Group 1999. Tranche 2 Action Plans Volume 4 - Invertebrates.English Nature, Peterborough.

  • Usher M.B. 1986. Wildlife conservation evaluation: attributes, criteria and values. In: Usher M.B. (ed.), Wildlife Conservation Evaluation. Chapman & Hall, London, pp.3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams P. 2000. Some properties of rarity scores used in site quality assessment.Br. J. Entomol. Nat. Hist.13:73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner S.M. 1991. Ground beetle (Coleoptera:Carabidae) communities on upland heath and their association with heathland flow.J. Biogeog. 18:281–289.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agricultural & Environmental Science and Entomological Monitoring Services (EMS), The University of Newcastle, 13 Manor Grove, Benton, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, NE7 7XQ, U.K.

    M.D. Eyre & M.L. Luff

Authors
  1. M.D. Eyre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M.L. Luff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.D. Eyre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eyre, M., Luff, M. The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in conservation assessments of exposed riverine sediment habitats in Scotland and northern England. Journal of Insect Conservation 6, 25–38 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015776720125

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015776720125

Search

Navigation