Abstract
Carbon abatement policies in large open economies affect both the allocation of domestic resources and international market prices. A change in international prices implies an indirect secondary burden or benefit for all trading countries. Based on simulations with a large-scale computable general equilibrium model of global trade and energy use, we show that international spillovers have important welfare implications for carbon abatement policies designed to meet exogenous emission reduction targets. We present a decomposition of the total welfare effect of carbon abatement policies into a primary domestic market effect (at constant international prices) and a secondary international spillover impact as a result of changes in international prices. This decomposition reveals the extent to which domestic abatement costs are increased or decreased as a result of the impact of carbon abatement on international prices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armington, P. S. (1969), ‘A Theory of Demand for Products Distinguished by Place of Production’, IMF Staff Papers 16, 159–178.
Babiker, M. and T. F. Rutherford (1997), Input-Output and General Equilibrium Estimates of Embodied Carbon: A Dataset and Static Framework for Assessment, working paper 97–2, University of Colorado, Boulder.
Böhringer, C. (2000), Cooling Down Hot Air – A Global CGE Analysis of Post-Kyoto Carbon Abatement Strategies, Energy Policy 28, 779–789.
Bovenberg, A. L. (1999), ‘Green Tax Reforms and the Double Dividend: An Updated Reader's Guide’, International Tax and Public Finance 6, 421–424.
DOE (1998), Department of Energy, Annual Energy Outlook (AEO 1998), Energy Information Administration http://www.eia.doe.gov
Ellerman, A. D. (1995), ‘The World Price of Coal’, Energy Policy 23(6), 466–506.
Goulder, L. H. (1995), ‘Environmental Taxation and the Double Dividend: A Readers’ Guide’, International Tax and Public Finance 2, 157–183.
Harrison J., M. Horridge and K. R. Pearson (2000), ‘Decomposing Simulation Results with Respect to Exogenous Shocks’, Computational Economics 15(3), 227–249.
Huff, K. M. and T. W. Hertel (1997), ‘Decomposing Welfare Changes in the GTAP Model’, GTAP Technical Paper No. 5, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
IEA (1996), International Energy Agency, Energy Prices and Taxes / Energy Balances of OECD and Non-OECD Countries. Paris: IEA publications.
IPCC (2001), International Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2001, Third Assessment Report, http://www.rivm.nl/env/int/ipcc
McDougall, R. A. (ed.) (1997), Global Trade, Assistance and Protection: The GTAP 3 Data Base, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University, West Lafayette.
Miller, M. H. and J. E. Spencer (1977), ‘The Static Economic Effects of the UK Joining the EEC: A General Equilibrium Approach’, The Review of Economic Studies 44(1), 71–93.
OECD (2001), Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development: Database on environmentally related taxes in OECD countries, http://www.oecd.org/env/policies/taxes/indes.htm
Pearce, D. W. (1991), ‘The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming’, Economic Journal 101, 938–948.
Shoven, J. B. and J. Whalley (1992), Applying General Equilibrium. Cambridge University Press.
UN 1997, United Nations, Kyoto Protocol, FCCC/CP/1997, Geneva.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Böhringer, C., Rutherford, T.F. Carbon Abatement and International Spillovers. Environmental and Resource Economics 22, 391–417 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016032424760
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016032424760