Abstract
Educational technology research has passed through a number of stages, focusing, in turn, on the content to be learned, the format of instructional messages, and the interaction between computers and students. The field is now concerned with the study of learning in complete, complex, and interactive learning environments. These environments allow both the simulation of experiences that students might have in the real world and also the creation of compelling experiences that cannot normally be experienced directly. Learning environments also often allow students to communicate their own ideas with the use of a variety of symbol systems. These environments are also frequently inhabited by more than one person, making learning within them a social activity where learning is distributed among both people and artifacts. Finally, these learning environments are complex. Studying how they contribute to learning therefore requires research methods other than controlled experiments. This paper reviews research on learning environments to give both an historical perspective on educational technology research and a selective view of the current state of the discipline. It concludes by identifying implications for both practice and future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barab, S. A., Hay, K. E., Squire, K., Barnett, M., Schmidt, R., Karrigan, K., Yamagata-Lynch, L., and Johnson, C. (2000). The virtual solar system: Learning through a technology-rich, inquiry-based, participatory learning environment. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 9(1): 7–25
Bell, P. (2002). Using argument maps to make thinking visible for individuals and groups. In Koschmann, T., Hall, R., and Miyake, N. (eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning II: Carrying Forward the Conversation, Erlbaum, Mawah, NJ.
Bell, P., and Slotta, J. J. (2001). Technology as controversy teaching partner: Genetically modified foods. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, February 2001
Bloom, B. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educ. Res. 13(6): 4–16
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. J. Learn. Sci. 2(2): 141–178
Brown, A. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. Am. Psychol. 52(4): 399–413
Brown, A., Bransford, J., and Cocking, R. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind Experience and School, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., and Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ. Res. 18(1): 32–43
Bruer, J. T. (1999). Neural connections: Some you use, some you lose. Phi Delta Kappan 81(4): 264–277
Byrne, C. (1996). Water on Tap: The Use of Virtual Reality as an Educational Tool, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Caird, J. K. (1996). Persistent issues in the application of virtual environment systems to training. IEEE Comp. Soc. Hum. Interact. Complex Syst. 3: 124–132
Carrier, C., Williams, M., and Davidson, G. (1985). Selection of instructional options in a computer-based coordinate concept lesson. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago
Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Rev. Educ. Res. 53: 445–460
Cronbach, L., and Snow, R. (1977). Aptitude and Instructional Methods, Irvington, New York
Dede, C., Salzman, M., Loftin, R. B., and Ash, K. (1997). Using virtual reality technology to convey abstract concepts. In Jacobson, M., and Kozma, R. (eds.), Learning Sciences for the 21st Century: Research, Design and Implementing Advanced Technology Learning Environments, Erlbaum, Mawah, NJ.
Dennett, D. (1995). Darwin's Dangerous Idea, Simon and Schuster, New York
Duffy, T. M., and Jonassen, D. H. (1992). Constructivism: New implications for educational technology. In Duffy, T., and Jonassen, D. (eds.), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Dwyer, F. M. (1985). Varied Self-Paced Micro-Computer Based Instructional Programs for addressing individual differenceswhenacquiring different levels of instructional objectives. Presented at the Annual Convention of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology, Anaheim, CA, January 1985
Fleming, M. L., and Levie, W. H. (1978). Instructional Message Design. Principles From the Behavioral Sciences, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Fleming, M. L., and Levie, W. H. (1993). Instructional Message Design: Principles From the Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L., and Wager, W. (1988). Principles of Instructional Design, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York
Gordin, D. N., Edelson, D. C., and Pea, R. (1996). Supporting students' science inquiry through scientific visualization activities. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, April 1996
Greeno, J. (1980). Some examples of cognitive task analysis with instructional implications. In Snow, R. E., Federico, P.-A., and Montague, W.E. (eds.), Aptitude, Learning and Instruction, Vol. 2, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Guddemi, P. (2000). Autopoeisis, semeiosis and co-coupling: A relational language for describing communication and adaptation. Cybern. Hum. Know. 7: 127–145
Hay, K. (1999). The digital weather station:Astudy of learning with 5-D visualization. Presented at the Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada, May 1999
Heinich, R. (1970). Technology and the Management of Instruction, Association for Educational Communication and Technology, Washington, DC.
Hereford, J., and Winn, W. D. (1994). Non-speech sound in the human-computer interface: A review and design guidelines. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 11: 209–231
Herrenkohl, L., and Guerra, M. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognit. Instr. 16: 431–473
Herrenkohl, L., Palincsar, A., DeWater, L., and Kawasaki, K. (1999). Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A socio-cognitive approach. J. Learn. Sci. 8: 451–493
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Jackson, R. (2000). Collaboration and Learning Within Tele-Immersive Virtual Environments, Ph.D. Dissertation, College of Education, University of Washington, Seattle
Jackson, R., Taylor, W., and Winn, W. D. (1999). Peer collaboration in virtual environments: An investigation of multi-participant virtual reality applied in primary science education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada, April 1999
Johansen, K., and Tennyson, R. (1983). Effect of adaptive advisement on perception in learnercontrolled, computer-based instruction using a rule-learning task. Educ.Commun.Technol. J. 31: 226–236
Kashiwa, K. I., Mitani, T., Tezuka, T., and Yoshikawa, H. (1995). Development of machine maintenance training system in virtual environment. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, ROMAN'95, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 295–300. IEEE, New York, 1995
Kozma, R. (1991). Learning with media. Rev. Educ. Res. 61: 179–211
Kulik, J. A. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. J. Educ. Psychol. 75(1): 19–26
Kulik, J. A. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. Comput. Hum. Behav. 1(1): 59–74
Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Levie, W. H. (1978). Principles for attitude change. In Fleming, M. L., and Levie, W. H. (eds.), Instructional Message Design. Principles From the Behavioral Sciences, Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Linn, M. (1995). Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 4(2): 103–126
Linn, M., Bell, P., and Hsi, S. (1998). Using the Internet to enhance student understanding of science: The knowledge integration environment. Interact. Learn. Environ. 6: 4–38
Lysakowski, R. S., and Walberg, H. J. (1982). Instructional effects of cues, participation and corrective feedback: A quantitative synthesis. Am. Educ. Res. J. 19: 559–578
Malarney, M. (2000). Learning Communities and On-Line Technologies: The Classroom at Sea Experience, Ph.D. Dissertation, College of Education, University of Washington, Seattle
Merrill, M. D. (1992). Constructivism and instructional design. In Duffy, T., and Jonassen, D. (eds.), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium (1995). OregonTrail II (CDROM), Minnesota Educational Computing Consortium, Minneapolis
Osberg, K. M. (1997). Constructivism in Practice: The Case for Meaning-Making in the Virtual World, Ph.D. Dissertation, College of Education, University of Washington, Seattle
Osberg, K. M., Winn, W., Rose, H., Hollander, A., and Hoffman, H. (1997). The effect of having grade seven students construct virtual environments on their comprehension of science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, May 1997
Pask, G. (1975). Conversation, Cognition and Learning, Elsevier, Amsterdam
Pea, R.D. (1994). Seeing whatwebuild together: Distributed multimedia learning environments for transformative communications. J. Learn. Sci. 3(3): 285–299
Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works, Norton, New York
Resnick, L. (1976). Task analysis in instructional design: Some cases from mathematics. In Klahr, D. (ed.), Cognition and Instruction, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Rousseau, J.-J. (1762/1933). Emile, [Translated by B. Foxley], E. P. Dutton, New York
Salomon, G. (1991). Transcending the qualitative-quantitative debate: The analytic and systemic approaches to educational research. Educ. Res. 20(6): 10–18.
Salomon, G. (ed.) (1995). Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Spiro, R., Feltovitch, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., and Coulson, R. L. (1992). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In Duffy, T., and Jonassen, D. (eds.), Constructivism and the Technology of Instruction: A Conversation, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Teasley, S. D., Finholt, T. A., Potter, C. S., Carragher, B., Carroll, L., Grosser, B., Hanlon, J., Kisseberth, N., Robinson, S., Weber, D., Snow, G., Claes, D. R., and Myers, J. D. (2000). Participatory science via the Internet. In Fishman, B., and O'Connor-Divelbiss, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Societies, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 376–383
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Windschitl, M., and Winn, W. D. (2000). A virtual environment designed to help students understand science. In Fishman, B., and O'Connor-Divelbiss, S. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference of the Learning Societies, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 290–296
Winn, W. D. (1993a). A conceptual basis for educational applications of virtual reality. (HITL Technical Report R-93-9), Human Interface Technology Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle
Winn, W. D. (1993b). A constructivist critique of the assumptions of instructional design. In Duffy, T., Lowyck, J., and Jonassen, D. (eds.), Designing Environments for Constructive Learning. Springer, New York, pp. 189–212
Winn, W. D. (1994). Contributions of perceptual and cognitive processes to the comprehension of graphics. In Schnotz, W., and Kulhavy, R. (eds.), Comprehension of Graphics, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 3–27
Winn, W. D., Hoffman, H., Hollander, A., Osberg, K., Rose, H., and Char, P. (1999). Studentbuilt virtual environments. Presence, 8(3): 283–292
Winn, W. D., and Windschitl, M. (2001). Towards an explanatory framework for learning in artificial environments. Cybern. Hum. Know. 8(4): 5–23
Winn, W. D., Windschitl, M., Fruland, R., Hedley, N., and Postner, L. (2001). Learning Science in an Immersive Virtual Environment. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, April 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Winn, W. Research into Practice: Current Trends in Educational Technology Research: The Study of Learning Environments. Educational Psychology Review 14, 331–351 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016068530070
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016068530070