Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability Importance Measures of the Components in a System Based on Semivalues and Probabilistic Values

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main contribution of this paper consists in providing different ways to value importance measures for components in a given reliability system or in an electronic circuit. The main tool used is a certain type of semivalues and probabilistic values. One of the results given here extends the indices given by Birnbaum [3] and Barlow and Proschan [2], which respectively coincide with the Banzhaf [1] and the Shapley and Shubik [15] indices so well-known in game theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.F. Banzhaf, Weighted voting doesn't work: A mathematical analysis, Rutges Law Review 19 (1965) 317-343.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.E. Barlow and F. Proschan, Importance of system components and fault tree event, Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 3 (1975) 153-172.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Z.W. Birnbaum, On the importance of different components in a multicomponent system, in: Multivariate Analysis II, ed. P.R. Krishnaiah (Academic Press, New York, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. Carreras and J. Freixas, Some theoretical reasons for using (regular) semivalues, in: Logic, Game Theory and Social Choice, ed. H. de Swart (Tilburg University Press, 1999) pp. 140-154.

  5. F. Carreras and J. Freixas, A note on regular semivalues, International Game Theory Review 2 (2000) 345-352.

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Carreras, J. Freixas and M.A. Puente, Semivalues as power indices, European Journal of Operation Research (2001) forthcoming.

  7. P. Dubey, On the uniqueness of the Shapley value, International Journal of Game Theory 4 (1975) 131-139.

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Dubey, A. Neyman and R. Weber, Value theory without efficiency, Mathematics of Operations Research 6 (1981) 122-128.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Dubey and L.S. Shapley, Mathematical properties of the Banzhaf power index, Mathematics of Operations Research 4 (1979) 99-131.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.R. Hilliard, Weighted voting theory and applications, Ph.D. thesis, School of Operation Research and Industrial Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Owen, Multilinear extensions of games, Management Science 18 (1972) 64-79.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Owen, Multilinear extensions and the Banzhaf value, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 22 (1975) 741-750.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K.G. Ramamurthy, Coherent Structures and Simple Games (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. L.S. Shapley, Simple games: An outline of the descriptive theory, Behavioral Science 7 (1962) 59-66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. L.S. Shapley and M. Shubik, A method for evaluating the distribution of power in a committee system, American Political Science Review 48 (1954) 787-792.

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Weber, Probabilistic values for games, in: The Shapley Value, ed. A. Roth (Cambridge University Press, 1988) pp. 101-119.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freixas, J., Puente, M.A. Reliability Importance Measures of the Components in a System Based on Semivalues and Probabilistic Values. Annals of Operations Research 109, 331–342 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016368606348

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016368606348

Navigation