Skip to main content
Log in

Role of chromate, molybdate and tungstate anions on the inhibition of aluminiumin chloride solutions

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of CrO4 2−, MoO4 2− and WO4 2− anions on the inhibition of aluminium corrosion in 0.5 M NaCl solution was investigated. The study comprised potentiodynamic polarization, potentiostatic current–time measurements complemented by SEM–EDAX and XPS investigations. It was found that, the pitting potential of an Al electrode in 0.5 M NaCl solution shifts in the positive direction by addition of CrO4 2−, MoO4 2− and WO4 2− anions, and the shift in potential increases with increase in concentration. A pronounced inhibiting influence was achieved on addition of CrO4 2−, MoO4 2− and WO4 2− anions to the electrolyte during potentiostatic current–time measurements. Chromate anions exhibit a great passivating influence during I/t measurements. This can be explained by the fact that the chromate anion, as a powerful oxidizing agent, is capable of oxidizing the corrosion sites to give a stable Al2O3 film. The inhibition observed on addition of molybdate anions is attributed to the adsorption and reaction of MoO4 2− anions on the electrode surface forming a molybdate layer which selectively impedes the ingress of Cl ions and hence inhibits the pitting attack. The adsorption of WO4 2− anions at flawed areas and developing pits was found to be the main factor for the observed inhibition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Pourbaix, ‘Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous solutions’ (Pergamon, 1966), p. 171.

  2. P.L. Cabot, F.A. Centellas, J.A. Garrido, E. Perez and H. Vidal, Electrochim. Acta 36 (1991) 179.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.E. Fetes, M.M. Stefenel, C. Mayer and T. Chierche, J. Appl. Electrochem. 20 (1990) 996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.S. Srinivasan and C.K. Mital, Electrochim. Acta 39 (1994) 2633.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Z.A. Foroulis and M.J. Thubrikar, J. Electrochem. Soc. 122 (1975) 1296.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Z.A. Foroulis and M.J. Thubrikar, Werkst. Korros. 26 (1975) 350.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Dallek and R.T. Foley, J. Electrochem. Soc. 123 (1976) 1775.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T.H. Nguyen and R.T. Foley, J. Electrochem. Soc. 127 (1980) 2563.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B.W. Samuels, K. Sotodudeh and R.T. Foley, Corrosion 27 (1981) 321.

    Google Scholar 

  10. P.M. Natishan, E. McCafferty and G.K. Hubler, J. Electrochem. Soc. 135 (1988) 321.

    Google Scholar 

  11. F. Hunker and H. Bohni, Werkst. Korro. 34 (1983) 68.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B.A. Shaw, G.D. Davis, T.L. Fritz and K.A. Olver, J. Electrochem. Soc. 137 (1990) 359.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.S. Vukasovich and J.P.G. Farr, Mater. Perform. 25 (1986) 9.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M.S. Vukasovich, Corrosion 89, Paper 444, NACE, Houston, TX (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Moniticelli, G. Brunoro, F. Zucchi and F. Fagioli, Werkst. Korros. 40 (1989) 393.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Kassab, K.M. Kamel and E. Abd El Hamid, J. Electrochem. Soc. India 36 (1987) 27.

    Google Scholar 

  17. W.A. Badawy and F.M. Al-Kharafi, Corros. Sci. 39 (1997) 681.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C.B. Breslin, G. Treacy and W.M. Carroll, Corros. Sci. 36 (1994) 1143.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.Kh. Bairamow, S. Zakiour and C. Leygraf, Corros. Sci. 25 (1985) 69.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M.A. Stranick, Corrosion 85, Paper 380, NACE, Houston, TX (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.C. McCune, R.L. Shilts and S.M. Ferguson, Corros. Sci. 22 (1982) 1049.

    Google Scholar 

  22. K.M. El-Sobki, A.A. Ismail, S. Ashour, A.A. Kheder and L.A. Shalaby, Corros. Prevent. Control 28 (1981) 7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.R. Wiggle, V. Hospadaruk and E.A. Styloglou Mater. Perform. 20 (1981) 13.

    Google Scholar 

  24. W.C. Moshier, G.D. Davis and G.O. Cote, J. Electrochem. Soc. 136 (1989) 356.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W.C. Moshier and G.D. Davis, Corrosion 46 (1990) 43.

    Google Scholar 

  26. C.R. Clayton and Y.C. Lu, J. Electrochem. Soc. 133 (1986) 2465.

    Google Scholar 

  27. W.C. Moshier, G.D. Davis, J.S. Aheam and H.F. Hough, J. Electrochem. Soc. 133 (1986) 1063.

    Google Scholar 

  28. C.D. Wagner, W.M. Riggs, L.E. Davis, J.F. Moulder and G.E. Muilenberg (Eds) ‘Handbook of X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy’ (Perkin-Elmer Corporation, USA, 1979), p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  29. T.H. Nguyen and R.T. Foley, J. Electrochem. Soc. 126 (1979) 1855.

    Google Scholar 

  30. L. Tomcsanyi, K. Varga, I. Bartik, G. Haronyi and E. Maleczki, Electrochim. Acta 34 (1989) 855.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abedin, S.Z.E. Role of chromate, molybdate and tungstate anions on the inhibition of aluminiumin chloride solutions. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry 31, 711–718 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017587911095

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017587911095

Navigation