Skip to main content
Log in

Quantifying into Question Acts

  • Published:
Natural Language Semantics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantified NPs in questions may lead to an interpretation in which the NP quantifies into the question. Which dish did every guest bring? can be understood as: 'For every guest x: which dish did x bring?'. After a review of previous approaches that tried to capture this quantification formally or to explain it away, it is argued that such readings involve quantification into speech acts. As the algebra of speech acts is more limited than a Boolean algebra – it only contains conjunction, not disjunction or negation – it is predicted that only universal quantifiers can scope out of questions or other speech acts. The approach is extended to indirect questions, which either are embedded speech acts or coerced to denote the true answers, depending on the embedding verb; in the latter case a Boolean structure results, and we find wide-scope readings of non-universal quantifiers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barwise, Jon and Cooper, Robin: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beghelli, Filippo: 1997, ‘The Syntax of Distributivity and Pair–List Readings’, in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 349–408, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, Nuel D., and Thomas B. Steel: 1976, The Logic of Questions and Answers, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, Stephen: 1989, ‘An Analysis of Quantificational Variability in Indirect Questions’, in E. Bach, A. Kratzer and B. H. Partee (eds.), Papers on Quantification, Department of Linguistics, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierwisch, Manfred: 1980, ‘Semantic Structure and Illocutionary Force’, in J. Searle, F. Kiefer and M. Bierwisch (eds.), Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics, pp. 1–35. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, Dwight: 1978, ‘Asking More than One Thing at a Time’, in H. Hiz (ed.), Questions, pp. 107–150. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafe, William: 1976, ‘Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics and Point of View’, in C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, pp. 27–55. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, Gennaro: 1993, ‘Questions with Quantifiers’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 181–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comorovski, Ileana: 1996, Interrogative Phrases and the Syntax–Semantics Interface, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrie, Bernard: 1981, Language Univerals and Linguistic Typology, Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, Elisabet: 1985, Interpreting Questions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1984, Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1989, ‘Type–shifting Rules and the Semantics of Interrogatives’, in G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee and R. Turner (eds.), Properties, Types and Meanings. Vol. 2: Semantic Issues, pp. 21–69. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, C.L.: 1973, ‘Questions in Montague Grammar’, Foundations of Language 10, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1992, ‘Presupposition Projection and the Semantics of Attitude Verbs’, Journal of Semantics 9, 183–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James and Robert May: 1981, ‘Questions, Quantifiers, and Crossing’, The Linguistic Review 1, 41–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Joachim: 1984, ‘Funktionale Satzperspektive und Illokutionssemantik’, Linguistische Berichte 91, 25–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, Lauri: 1977, ‘Syntax and Semantics of Questions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Edward and Leonard M. Faltz: 1985, Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Young–joo and Richard Larson: 1989, ‘Scope Interpretation and the Syntax of Psych–Verbs’, Linguistic Inquiry 20(4), 681–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1992, ‘Definite NPs Aren't Quantifiers’, Linguistic Inquiry 23(1), 156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 1999, ‘Quantifying into Question Acts’, Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 9, CLC Publications, Cornell University, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, Manfred: 2001, ‘For a Structured Account of Questions and Answers’, in C. Fery and W. Sternefeld (eds.), Audiatur vox sapientiae, Akademie–Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuno, Susumo: 1982, ‘The Focus of the Question and the Focus of the Answer’, Papers from the Parassession on Nondeclaratives, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri, Utpal: 2000, ‘Lexical Selection and Quantificational Variability in embedded Interrogatives’, Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 325–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambrecht, Knud: 1994, Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representation of Discourse Referents, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Chungmin: 1975, ‘Embedded Performatives’, Language 51, 105–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Stephen C.: 1983, Pragmatics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David: 1970, ‘General Semantics’, Synthese 22, 18–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: A Lattice–Theoretical Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, pp. 303–323. de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Feng–hsi: 1990, Scope Dependency in English and Chinese, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merin, Arthur: 1992, ‘Permission Sentences Stand in the Way of Boolean and Other Lattice–Theoretic Semantics’, Journal of Semantics 9, 95–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merin, Arthur: 1994, ‘Algebra of Elementary Social Acts’, in S. L. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory: Philosophical and Linguistic Perspectives, pp. 234–266. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moltmann, Friederike and Anna Szabolcsi: 1994, ‘Scope Interactions with Pair–List Quantifiers’, Proceedings of NELS 24, GLSA, University of Massachusetts of Amherst.

  • Pafel, Jürgen: 1999, ‘Interrogative Quantifiers within Scope’, Linguistics and Philosophy 22, 255–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara H. and Mats Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, pp. 361–383. de Gruyter, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, Bradley L.: 1990, ‘A Note on Scope Interaction with Definite Plural NPs’, Linguistic Inquiry 21(4), 646–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, John R.: 1970, ‘On Declarative Sentences’, in R. A. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, pp. 222–272. Ginn, Waltham, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John: 1969, Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press.

  • Srivastav Dayal, Veneeta: 1992, ‘Two Types of Universal Terms in Questions’, Proceedings of NELS 22, GLSA, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Stalnaker, Robert: 1974, ‘Pragmatic Presuppositions’, in M. Munitz and P. Unger (eds.), Semantics and Philosophy, pp. 197–213 New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenius, E.: 1967, ‘Mood and Language Game’, Synthese 17, 254–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna: 1993, ‘Quantifiers in Pair–List Readings and the Non–uniformity of Quantification’, Ninth Amsterdam Colloquium, pp. 645–664. ILLC/University of Amsterdam.

  • Szabolcsi, Anna: 1997a, ‘Quantifiers in Pair–List Readings’, in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 311–347. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna: 1997b, ‘Strategies for Scope Taking’, in A. Szabolcsi (ed.), Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 109–154. Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, Anna and Frans Zwarts: 1993, ‘Weak Islands and an Algebraic Semantics for Scope Taking’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 235–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Stechow, Arnim: 1990, ‘Focusing and Backgrounding Operators’, in W. Abraham (ed.), Discourse Particles, pp. 37–84. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1958, Philosophische Untersuchungen. Basil Blackwell, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krifka, M. Quantifying into Question Acts. Natural Language Semantics 9, 1–40 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017903702063

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017903702063

Keywords

Navigation