Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since Vassily V. Nalimov coined the term ‘scientometrics’ in the 1960s, this term has grown in popularity and is used to describe the study of science: growth, structure, interrelationships and productivity. Scientometrics is related to and has overlapping interests with bibliometrics and informetrics. The terms bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics refer to component fields related to the study of the dynamics of disciplines as reflected in the production of their literature. Areas of study range from charting changes in the output of a scholarly field through time and across countries, to the library collection problem of maintaining control of the output, and to the low publication productivity of most researchers. These terms are used to describe similar and overlapping methodologies. The origins and historical survey of the development of each of these terms are presented. Profiles of the usage of each of these terms over time are presented, using an appropriate subject category of databases on the DIALOG information service. Various definitions of each of the terms are provided from an examination of the literature. The size of the overall literature of these fields is determined and the growth and stabilisation of both the dissertation and non-dissertation literature are shown. A listing of the top journals in the three fields are given, as well as a list of the major reviews and bibliographies that have been published over the years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almind, T. C., P. Ingwersen (1997), Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: Methodological approaches to ‘Webometrics’, Journal of Documentation, 53: 404–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackert, L., K. Siegel (1979), Ist in der Wissenschaftlich-Technischen Information Platz für die INFORMETRIE? Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Technischen Hochschule Ilmenau, 25 (6): 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonitz, M. (1982), Scientometrie, Bibliometrie, Informetrie, Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen, 96 (2): 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossy, M. J. (1995), The last of the litter: “Netometrics”. Solaris Information Communication, 2: 245–250. http://www.info.unicaen.fr/bnum/jelec/Solaris/d02/2bossy.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, S. C. (1934), Sources of information on specific subjects, Engineering, 137: 85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T. (1994) (Ed.), Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond? Scientometrics, 30: 373–537.

  • Broadus, R. N. (1987a), Early approaches to bibliometrics, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 38: 127–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadus, R. N. (1987b), Toward a definition of ‘bibliometrics’, Scientometrics, 12: 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, B. C. (1988), Comments on the scope of bibliometrics, In: L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds) Informetrics 87/88. Select Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information Retrieval, Amsterdam, Elsevier Science, pp. 29–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, B. C. (1990), Biblio-, Sciento-, Infor-metrics??? What are we talking about? In: L. Egghe, R. Rousseau (Eds), Informetrics 89/90. Selection of Papers Submitted for the Second International Conference on Bibliometrics, Scientometrics and Informetrics, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Elsevier, pp. 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, M. K., Z. Liu (1995), History of information science. In: M. E. Williams, (Ed.), Annual review of information science and technology, Vol. 30, Information Today, Inc. for the American Society for Information Science, Medford, NJ, pp. 385–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, H. D. (1988), Use of a virtual information system for bibliometric analysis, Information Processing and Management, 24: 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F. B. F., The Theory of the National and International Bibliography: with Special Reference to the Introduction of System in the Record of Modern Literature, Library Bureau, London, England, 1896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chongde, W. (1996), In Chinese. On dispute in bibliometrics, Journal of Information, Communication, and Library Science, 2: 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, F. J., N. B. Eales (1917), The history of comparative anatomy. Part I: A statistical analysis of the literature, Science Progress (London), 11: 578–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • CYBERMETRICS: International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics. 1997–. Aguillo, Isidro F., Ed. ISSN 1137–5019. Available http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/editors.html.

  • Deogan, M. S. (1987), On-line bibliometrics, Lucknow Librarian, 19: 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y. (1998a), Scholarly Communication and bibliometrics. Part 1: The Scholarly Communication Model. Literature Review, International Forum on Information and Documentation, 23(2): 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, Y. (1998b), Scholarly Communication and bibliometrics. Part 2: The Scholarly Communication Process. Literature Review, International Forum on Information and Documentation, 23(3): 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L. (1988), On the classification of the classical bibliometric laws, Journal of Documentation, 44: 53–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., R. Rousseau (1988), (Eds) Informetrics 87/88: Select Proceedings of the First International Conference on Bibliometrics and Theoretical Aspects of Information Retrieval; 1987 August 25–28; Diepenbeek, Belgium. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., R. Rousseau (1990a), (Eds) Informetrics 89/90: Selection of Papers Submitted for the Second International Conference on Bibliometrics, Scientometrics and Informetrics; 1989 July 5–7; London, Ontario, Canada. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egghe, L., R. Rousseau (1990b), Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairthorne, R. A. (1969), Empirical hyperbolic distributions (Bradford-Zipf-Mandelbrot) for bibliometric description and prediction, Journal of Documentation, 25: 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, E. N. DA (1973), In Portuguese. Bibliografia Estatistica e Bibliometria: Uma Reivindicacao de Prioridades. [Statistical bibliography and bibliometrics: a revindication of priorities], Ciencia da Informacao, 2 (1): 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • GlÄnzel, W., H. Kretschmer (1992), (Eds) Selected Papers Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Bibliometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics; 1993 September 11–15; Berlin, Germany, Research Evaluation, 2 (3): 121–188.

  • GlÄnzel, W., H. Kretschmer (1994a), (Eds) Selected Papers Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Bibliometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics; 1993 September 11–15; Berlin, Germany.Scientometrics, 30 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • GlÄnzel, W., H. Kretschmer (1994b), (Eds) Selected Papers Presented at the Fourth International Conference on Bibliometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics; 1993 September 11–15; Berlin, Germany, Science and Science of Science, 3 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  • GlÄnzel, W., U. Schoepflin (1994), Little scientometrics, big scientometrics ... and beyond? Scientometrics, 30: 375–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gluck, M. (1990), A review of journal coverage overlap with an extension to the definition of overlap, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41: 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorkova, V. I. (1988), Informetriya [Informetrics]. VINITI, Moscow, (Itogi Nauki i Tekhniki series, 10 [Results in Science and Technology]).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, B. C. (1979), Science literature-how faulty a mirror of science? Aslib Proceedings, 31: 381–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, M. A. (1993), Multiple authors, multiple problems-bibliometrics and the study of scholarly collaboration: a literature review, Library and Information Science Research, 15 (4): 325–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, D. T. (1977), Unconventional uses of on-line information retrieval systems: on-line bibliometric studies, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28: 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzel, D. H. (1987), History of the development of ideas in bibliometrics. In: A. Kent, (Ed.), Encyclopedia of library and information sciences, Vol. 42 (Supplement 7), Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 144–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herubel, J.-P. V. M., A. L. Buchanan (1994), Citation studies in the humanities and social sciences: a selective and annotated bibliography, Collection Management, 18: 89–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjerppe, R. (1980), A bibliography of bibliometrics and citation indexing and analysis, Royal Institute of Technology Library, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjerppe, R. (1982), Supplement to a bibliography of bibliometrics and citation analysis, Scientometrics, 4: 241–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, E. W. (1923), Statistical bibliography in relation to the growth of modern civilization, Grafton & Co., London, pp. 29–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P., F. H. Christensen (1997), Data set isolation for bibliometric online analyses of research publications: fundamental methodological issues, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48: 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khawaja, I. (1987), An alternative stipulation of the term bibliometry, Pakistan Library Bulletin, 18: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurshid, A., H. Sahai (1991a), Bibliometric distributions and laws: some comments and a selected bibliography, Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences, 28: 433–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khurshid, A., H. Sahai (1991b), Bibliometric, scientometric and informetric distributions and laws: a selected bibliography, International Forum on Information and Documentation, 16: 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig, M. E. D., A. Bookstein (1995), (Eds) Fifth Biennial Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics; 1995 June 7–10; River Forest, IL. Learned Information, Inc., Medford, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawani, S. M. (1980), Quality, collaboration, and citations in cancer research: a bibliometric study, Florida: PhD thesis, Florida State University.

  • Lawani, S. M. (1981), Bibliometrics: its theoretical foundations, methods and applications, Libri, 31: 294–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockett, M. W. (1989), The Bradford distribution — a review of the literature, 1934–1987, Library and Information Science Research, 11: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1926), The frequency distribution of scientific productivity, Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 16 (12): 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacÍas-Chapula, C. A. (1999), (Ed.) Seventh Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics; 1999 July 5–8; Colima, México. Universidad de Colima, Colima, México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nacke, O. (1979), Informetrie: Ein neuer Name für eine neue Disziplin, Nachrichten für Dokumentation, 30: 212–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nacke, O., R. Wehmeier, O. H. Eisenhardt (1980), Informetrie und Scientometrie: Cui Bono? Ein Dialog, eine Liste und ein Programm, Nachrichten für Dokumentation, 31: 100–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagpaul, P. S., K. C. Garg, B. M. Gupta (1999), (Eds), Emerging Trends in Scientometrics. New Delhi, Allied Publishers Ltd, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalimov, V. V. (1970), Influence of mathematic statistics and cybernetics on the methodology of scientific investigations, Zavodskaya Laboratoriya, 36 (10): 1218–1226. [English translation in Industrial Laboratory, 36 (10): 1549–1558.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalimov, V. V., I. V. Kordon, A. YA. Korneeva (1971), Geograficheskoe Raspredelenie Nauchnoi Informatsii. [Geographic Distribution of Scientific Information.] Informatsionnye Materialy. Moscow: an SSSR Nauchnyi Sovet po Kompleksnoi Probleme Kibernetiki. [Informational Papers. Moscow: Soviet Academy of Science, Scientific Council on Cybernetics.] 2: 3–37. [English translation in: V. V. NALIMOV, Faces of Science. Philadelphia, Institute for Scientific Information, 1981, 237–260 (chapter 11).]

  • Nalimov, V. V., Z. M. Mulchenko (1969a), Eshche raz k voprosu o kontseptsii eksponentsial'nogo rosta. [A word to add on the exponential growth concept.] Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya. Seriya 2. 8: 12–14. [English translation in: Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics. 3 (1969) 37–40.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Nalimov, V. V., Z. M. Mulchenko (1969b), Naukometriya. Izuchenie Razvitiya Nauki kak Informatsionnogo Protsessa. [Scientometrics. Study of the Development of Science as an Information Process], Nauka, Moscow, (English translation: 1971. Washington, D.C.: Foreign Technology Division. U.S. Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio. (NTIS Report No.AD735–634).

  • Narin, F., J. K. MOLL, Bibliometrics. In: M. E. Williams (1977) (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology Vol. 12, Knowledge Industries Publications, Inc. for the American Society for Information Science, White Plains, NY, pp. 35–58.

  • Osareh, F. (1996a), Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: a review of the literature I, Libri, 46: 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osareh, F. (1996b), Bibliometrics, citation analysis and co-citation analysis: a review of the literature II, Libri, 46: 217–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otlet, P. (1934), Traite de Documentation. Le Livre sur le Livre. Theorie et Pratique. [Treatise on documentation. The book on the book. Theory and practice], Van Keerberghen, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peritz, B. C. (1984), On the careers of terminologies; the case of bibliometrics, Libri, 34: 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peritz, B. C. (1990), A Bradford distribution for bibliometrics, Scientometrics, 18: 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peritz, B. C. (1994), Review of 'Bibliometrics: an annotated bibliography' by Mary K. Sellen, Library Quarterly, 64 (3): 357–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peritz, B. C., L. Egghe (1997), (Eds) Sixth Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics; 1997 June 16–19; Jerusalem, Israel. The School of Library, Archive and Information Studies of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

  • Pierce, S. J. (1992), On the origin and meaning of bibliometric indicators: journals in the social sciences, 1886–1985, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43: 477–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portal, S. G. (1995), Principios teoricos y metodologicos de los estudios metricos, Investigacion Bibliotecologica: Archivonomia, Bibliotecologia, e Informacion, 8:23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A. (1969a), Statistical bibliography; an interim bibliography, North-Western Polytechnic, School of Librarianship, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A. (1969b), Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics?, Journal of Documentation, 25: 348–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, A., G. R. Wittig (1981), Bibliometrics: a bibliography and index. Volume 1: 1874–1959, ALLM Books, Watford, Hertfordshire, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, I. K. R. (1992), (Ed.) Informetrics-91. Selected Papers From the Third International Conference on Informetrics; 1991 August 9–12; Bangalore, India. Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science, Bangalore, India.

  • Roman, E. (1994), Biblio/scientometria, [Biblio/scientometrics] Probleme de Informare si Documentare, 28: 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R. (2000), Review of 'Emerging Trends in Scientometrics' by P. S. Nagpaul, et al., Library and Information Science Research, 10 (2) http://libres.curtin.edu.au/libres10n2/reviews.htm#nagpaul.

  • Roy, R. P. M. (1980), Citation analysis: a new tool for the modern librarian, IASLIC Bulletin, 25: 109–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidmaier, D. (1984), Zur Geschichte der Bibliometrie, Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen, 98: 404–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, A. M. (1984), In search of a name: information science and its conceptual antecedents, Library and Information Science Research, 6: 227–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (1983), (1991), Quantitative studies of science. A current bibliography. No. 1–17. Scientometrics, 5: 125–133, 20: 451–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (1995), Quantitative studies of science in the eighties. Indexes to ‘Current bibliographies’ 1–17. Scientometrics, 32: 263–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (1996a), Scientometrics: A citation based bibliography, 1990, Scientometrics, 35: 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (1996b), Scientometrics: A citation based bibliography, 1991, Scientometrics, 35: 393–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (1996c), Scientometrics: A citation based bibliography, 1992, Scientometrics, 36: 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (1996d), Scientometrics: A citation based bibliography, 1993, Scientometrics, 36: 273–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, A. (1999), Scientometrics: A citation based bibliography, 1994–1996, Scientometrics, 44: 267–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellen, M. K. (1993), Bibliometrics: an annotated bibliography, 1970–1990. G.K. Hall & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, I. N. (1992), Bibliometrics, informetrics, scientometrics and librametrics: an overview, Libri, 42: 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, F. R. (1992), Origins of bibliometrics, citation indexing, and citation analysis: the neglected legal literature, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43: 337–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soper, M. E., L. N. Osborne, D. L. Zweizig, R. R. Powell (1990), The librarian's thesaurus, American Library Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe, R. C. (1986), Annotated bibliography of publications dealing with qualitative and quantitative indicators of the quality of science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tague-Sutcliffe, J. M. (1992a), An introduction to informetrics, Information Processing & Management, 28: 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tague-Sutcliffe, J. M. (1992b), (Ed.) Special Issue: Informetrics. Information Processing & Management, 28: 1–151.

  • Tague-Sutcliffe, J. M. (1994), Quantitative methods in documentation. In: B. C. Vickery, (Ed.), Fifty years of information progress: a journal of documentation review, ASLIB, London, England, pp. 147–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (1997), Scientometrics: State-of-the-Art, Scientometrics, 38: 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (1998), (Ed.) Special Topic Issue: Science and Technology Indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49: 3–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachy, J. (1978), Frequency distributions of scientific performance: a bibliography of Lotka's law and related phenomena, Scientometrics, 1: 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachy, J. (1979), Nobel prizes. A bibliography of scientometric papers and data sources, Scientometrics, 1: 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, B. H. (1997), The earliest Hebrew citation indexes, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48: 318–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., K. W. McCain (1989), Bibliometrics. In: M. E. Williams, (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol. 24, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. for the American Society for Information Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 119–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. S. (1995), The formation of subject literature collections for bibliometric analysis: the case of the topic of Bradford's Law of Scattering, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, http://www.library.unsw.edu.au/~thesis/adt-NUN/public/adt-NUN1999.0056

  • Wilson, C. S. (2001), Informetrics. In: M. E. Williams, (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Vol.34, Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc. for the American Society for Information Science, pp. 3–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittig, G. R. (1978), Documentation note: statistical bibliography — a historical footnote, Journal of Documentation, 34: 240–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipf, G. K. (1949), Human behavior and the principle of least effort, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Information Systems, Technology and Management, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    William W. Hood & Concepción S. Wilson

Authors
  1. William W. Hood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Concepción S. Wilson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hood, W.W., Wilson, C.S. The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics. Scientometrics 52, 291–314 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342

Keywords

Search

Navigation