Skip to main content
Log in

A longitudinal assessment of college student engagement in good practices in undergraduate education

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determinewhether student engagement in three goodeducational practices (cooperation with peers,active learning, faculty-student interaction)increased between 1983 and 1997 in response tothe calls to improve the quality ofundergraduate education in the United States.The data source was 73,050 students whocompleted the College Student ExperiencesQuestionnaire. The results from multipleregression and effect size analyses showed thatthe frequency of involvement in these goodpractices did not change over time. Variationin the scores of the three indicators acrossyears and types of institution(doctoral-granting universities, comprehensiveuniversities, liberal arts colleges) wasminimal indicating a stable pattern with onlyrandom fluctuations during this 15 yearperiod.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, R.P. (1995). Statistics as Principled Argument. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association (1994). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

  • Association of American Colleges (1985). Integrity in the College Curriculum: A Report to the Academic Community. Washington, DC: Author.

  • Astin, A.W. (1985). Achieving Educational Excellence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A.W. (1997). ‘The changing American college student: Thirty year trends 1966–1996’, The Review of Higher Education 21(2), 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, L.L. (1976). Using Self-reports to Predict Student Performance. New York: College Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R.B. and Tagg, J. (1995). ‘From teaching to learning – A new paradigm for Under-graduate education’, Change, pp. 13–25.

  • Barron's Profiles of American Colleges (1996). Hauppage, NY:Barron's Educational Series.

  • Bennett, W. (1984). To Reclaim a Legacy: A Report on the Humanities in Higher Education. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, K.S. and Ulrich, D.O. (1986). ‘Transformational leadership in colleges and univer-sities’, in Smart, J.C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (Vol. II) pp. 1–42. New York: Agathon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1994). A Classification of Institutions of Higher Education: A Technical Report. Princeton, NJ: Author.

  • Chickering, A.W. and Gamson, Z.F. (1987). ‘Seven principles for good practice in under-graduate education’, AAHE Bulletin 39(7), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1994). ‘The earth is round (p < 0.05)’, American Psychologist 49, 997–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Commission of the States (1995). Making Quality Count in Undergraduate Education. Denver, CO: Author.

  • Ewell, P.T. and Jones, D.P. (1993). ‘Actions matter: The case for indirect measures in assessing higher education's progress on the national education goals’, Journal of General Education 42, 123–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P.T. and Jones, D.P. (1994). ‘Data, indicators and the national center for higher education management systems’, in Borden, V.M. and Banta, T.W. (eds.), Using Performance Indicators to Guide Strategic Decision Making. New Directions for Institutional Research, No. 82, pp. 23–35. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewell, P.T. and Jones, D.P. (1996). Indicators of “Good Practice” in Undergraduate Educa-tion: A Handbook for Development and Implementation. Boulder, CO: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, Z.F. (1991). ‘A brief history of the seven principles for good practice in under-graduate education’, in Chickering, A.W. and Gamson, Z.F. (eds.), Applying the Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 47, pp. 5–12. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, Z.F. (1995). ‘Introduction’, in Hatfield S.R. (ed.), The Seven Principles in Action: Improving Undergraduate Education, pp. 1–8. Bolton, MA: Anker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskin, A. (1996). ‘Facing the future: The change process in restructuring universities’, Change 28(4), 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, L.V. and Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis. NewYork: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G.D. (1999). ‘How are we doing? Tracking the quality of the undergraduate experience, 1960s to the present’, The Review of Higher Education 22, 99–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G.D. (in press). ‘College students today: Why we can't leave serendipity to chance’, in Altbach, P., Gumport, P. and Johnstone, B. (eds.), In Defense of the American University. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Kuh, G.D. and Vesper, N. (1997). ‘A comparison of student experiences with good practices in undergraduate education between 1990 and 1994’, The Review of Higher Education 21, 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G.D., Pace, C.R. and Vesper, N. (1997a). ‘The development of process indicators to estimate student gains associated with good practices in undergraduate education’, Research in Higher Education 38, 435–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G.D., Vesper, N., Connolly, M.R. and Pace, C.R. (1997b). College Student Experiences Questionnaire: Revised Norms for the Third Edition. Bloomington, IN: Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Indiana University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, J., Swayer, R. and Noble, J. (1988). ‘Accuracy of self-reported activities and accomplishments of college-bound seniors’, Journal of College Student Development 29, 362–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, A.C. (2000). ‘Bringing the Carnegie Classification into the 21st century’, AAHE Bulletin January, 3–6, 16.

  • National Center for Higher Education Management Systems, NCHEMS (1994). A Preliminary Dtudy of the Feasibility and Utility for National Policy of Instructional “Good Practice” Indicators in Undergraduate Education. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C.R. (1984). Measuring The Quality of College Student Experiences. Los Angeles: University of California, Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C.R. (1985). The Credibility of Student Self-reports. Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C.R. (1990). College Student Experiences Questionnaire (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: University of California, Center for the Study of Evaluation, Graduate School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E.T. and Terenzini, P.T. (1991). How College Affects Students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G.R. (1995). ‘The relationships between self-reports of college experiences and achievement test scores’, Research in Higher Education 36, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rush, S.C. (1995). ‘Searching for solid ground’, in Johnson, S.L. and Rush, S.C. (eds.), Reinventing the University: Managing and Financing Institutions of Higher Education, pp. 3–17. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Study Group on the Conditions of Excellence in American Higher Education. (1984). Involvement in learning: Realizing the potential of American higher education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

  • Thompson, B. (1994). ‘Guidelines for authors’, Educational and Psychological Measurement 54, 837–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, C.F. and Martin, E. (eds.) (1984). Surveying Subjective Phenomena (Vol. 1). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, W.J. (1995). ‘Impediments to overcome if academia is going to successfully embrace total quality management’, in Sims, S.J. and Sims, R.R. (eds.), Total Quality Management in Higher Education. Is it Working? Why or Why Not? pp. 54–68. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koljatic, M., Kuh, G.D. A longitudinal assessment of college student engagement in good practices in undergraduate education. Higher Education 42, 351–371 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017993113390

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017993113390

Navigation