Skip to main content
Log in

A Simulation Study of Joint Uses of Data Envelopment Analysis and Statistical Regressions for Production Function Estimation and Efficiency Evaluation

  • Published:
Journal of Productivity Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A previous paper by Arnold, Bardhan, Cooper and Kumbhakar (1996) introduced a very simple method to estimate a production frontier by proceeding in two stages as follows: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is used in the first stage to identify efficient and inefficient decision-making units (DMUs). In the second stage the thus identified DMUs are incorporated as dummy variables in OLS (ordinary least squares) regressions. This gave very satisfactory results for both the efficient and inefficient DMUs. Here a simulation study provides additional evidence. Using this same two-stage approach with Cobb-Douglas and CES (constant elasticity-of-substitution) production functions, the estimated values for the coefficients associated with efficient DMUs are found to be not significantly different from the true parameter values for the (known) production functions whereas the parameter estimates for the inefficient DMUs are significantly different. A separate section of the present paper is devoted to explanations of these results. Other sections describe methods for estimating input-specific inefficiencies from the first stage use of DEA in the two-stage approaches. A concluding section provides further directions for research and use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aigner, D., and S. F. Chu. (1968). “On Estimating the Industry Production Function.” American Economic Review 826–839.

  • Aigner, D., C. A. K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt. (1977). “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6, 21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, V., I. Bardhan and W. W. Cooper. (1997). “A Two-Stage DEA Approach for Identifying and Rewarding Efficiency in Texas Secondary Schools.” In W. W. Cooper, S. Thore, D. Gibson and F. Phillips (eds.), Impact: How IC 2 Research Affects Public Policy and Business Markets, Westport Conn: Quantum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, V., I. R. Bardhan, W. W. Cooper, and A. Gallegos. (1994). “Primal and Dual Optimality in Computer Codes Using Two-Stage Solution Procedures in DEA.” In J. Aronson and S. Zionts (eds.), Operations Research: Methods, Models and Applications, Proceedings of a Conference in Honor of G. L. Thompson. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, V., I. R. Bardhan, W. W. Cooper, and S. C. Kumbhakar. (1996). “New Uses of DEA and Statistical Regressions for Efficiency Evaluation and Estimation-With an Illustrative Application to Public Secondary Schools in Texas.” Annals of Operations Research 66, 255–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D. (1984). “Estimating Most Productive Scale Size Using Data Envelopment Analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research 17, 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D. (1993). “Maximum Likelihood, Consistency and Data Envelopment Analysis: A Statistical Foundation.” Management Science 39, 1265–1273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., H. Chang, and W. W. Cooper. (1996). “Simulation Studies of Inefficiency Evaluations, Returns-to-Scale and Mis-specification with Non-linear Functions in DEA.” Annals of Operations Research 66, 233–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., H. Chang, and W. W. Cooper. (1995). “Equivalence of Alternative Methods for Estimating Returns-to-Scale in DEA and Methods for their Implementation.” European Journal of Operational Research 89, 473–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper. (1984). “Models for Estimating Technical and Returns to Scale Efficiencies in DEA.” Management Science 30, 1078–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, and A. Maindiratta. (1987). “A Comparison of Data Envelopment Analysis and Translog Estimates of Production Frontiers with Simulated Observations from a Known Technology.” In A. Dogramaci and R. Fare (eds.), Applications of Modern Production Theory in Efficiency and Productivity. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 33–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D. and W. W. Cooper. (1994). “Validation and Generalization of DEA and Its Uses.” TOP 2(2), 249–297. With accompanying discussions by E. Grifell-Tatje, J. T. Pastor, P. W. Wilson, E. Ley and C. K. Lovell. (This is the new journal of Spain's Society for Statistics and Operations Research.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., V. Gadh, and W. Gorr. (1993). “A Monte-Carlo Comparison of Two Production Frontier Estimation Methods: Corrected Ordinary Least Squares and Data Envelopment Analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research 67, 332–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, I. R. (1995). “Data Envelopment Analysis and Frontier Regression Approaches for Evaluating the Efficiency of Public Sector Activities: Applications to Public School Education in Texas.” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas Graduate School of Business, Austin, Texas. Also available from University Microfilms, Inc. Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackorby, C. and R. R. Russell. (1989). “Will the Real Elasticity of Substitution Please Stand Up? A Comparison of Allen/Uzawa and Mirishima Elasticities.” American Economic Review 79, 882–888.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlin,W. F., A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and H. D. Sherman. (1985). “Data Envelopment Analysis and Regression Approaches to Efficiency Evaluation.” Annals of Operations Research, 113–138.

  • Chaffai, M. E. (1997). “Estimating Input-Specific Technical Inefficiency: The Case of Tunisian Banking Industry.” In A. N. Berger, P.L. Brockett, W.W. Cooper and J.T. Pastor (eds.), Special Issue on “Evaluating the Performances of Financial Institutions,” European Journal of Operational Research 98(2), 314–331.

  • Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes. (1978). “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units.” European Journal of Operational Research 3, 429–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W. and A. Gallegos. (1991). “A Combined DEA-Stochastic Frontier Approach to Latin American Airline Efficiency Evaluations.” Research Report, The University of Texas, Graduate School of Business, Austin, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. W., R. Thompson and R. M. Thrall. (1996). “Introduction: Extensions and New Developments in DEA.” In W. W. Cooper, G. L. Thompson and R. M. Thrall (eds.), Special Issue of “Extensions and New Developments in DEA,” Annals of Operations Research 66.

  • Farrell, M. J. (1957). “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120, 253–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. S. (1974). “Econometric Studies of Health Economics.” In M. Intriligator and D. Kendrick, (eds.), Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Amsterdam: North-Holland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsund, F. R., C. A. K. Lovell and P. Schmidt. (1980). “A Survey of Frontier Production Functions and of Their Relationship to Efficiency Measurement.” Journal of Econometrics, 5–25.

  • Goldberger, A. S. (1972). “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Regressions Containing Unobserved Independent Variables.” International Economic Review 13, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, B. H., and R. C. Sickles. (1990). “Finite Sample Evidence on the Performance of Stochastic Frontiers and Data Envelopment Analysis using Panel Data.” Journal of Econometrics 51, 259–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. J. and B. W. Silverman. (1994). Nonparametric Regression and Generalized Linear Models. New York: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, Cheng. (1986). Analysis of Panel Data. Cambridge: Cambridge Univesrity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (1984). Econometric Methods. Third Edition, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow, J., C. A. K. Lovell, I. S. Materov, and P. Schmidt. (1982). “On the Estimation of Technical Inefficiency in the Stochastic Frontier Production Model.” Journal of Econometrics 51, 259–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kmenta, J. (1986). Elements of Econometrics. Second Edition, New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotz, S. L. and N. L. Johnson, eds. (1983). Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences. New York: Wiley Interscience Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar, S. C. (1988). “Estimation of Input-Specific Technical and Allocative Inefficiency in Stochastic Frontier Models.” Oxford Economic Papers 40, 535–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C. A. K., and P. Schmidt. (1979). “Estimating Technical and Allocative Inefficiency Relative to Stochastic Production and Cost Frontiers.” Journal of Econometrics 9, 343–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W., and J. van den Broeck. (1977). “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Functions with Composed Error.” International Economic Review, 435–444.

  • Pagan, A. (1984). “Econometric Issues in the Analysis of Regressions with Generated Regressors.” International Economic Review 25, 221–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, E. (1978). “Data Envelopment Analysis and Related Approaches for Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units with an Application to Program Follow Through in U.S. Public School Education,” Ph.D. Thesis. Pittsburgh, Pa: Carnegie Mellon University School of Urban and Public Affairs. Also available from University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, P. (1976). “On the Statistical Estimation of Parametric Frontier Production Functions.” Review of Economics and Statistics, 238–239.

  • Thompson, J. P. and R. A. Tapia. (1990). Nonparametric Function Estimation, Modeling and Simulation. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, A. (1970). “Estimation of Regression Relationships Containing Unobserved Variables.” International Economic Review 11, 441–454.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bardhan, I.R., Cooper, W.W. & Kumbhakar, S.C. A Simulation Study of Joint Uses of Data Envelopment Analysis and Statistical Regressions for Production Function Estimation and Efficiency Evaluation. Journal of Productivity Analysis 9, 249–278 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018339122236

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018339122236

Navigation