Skip to main content
Log in

Multiblock copolyesters as biomaterials: in vitro biocompatibility testing

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cell adhesion, cell growth and cell activities of macrophages and fibroblasts, cultured on newly developed degradable multiblock-copolyesters were studied to examine the biocompatibility and the possible use of these polymers for medical applications. The biocompatibility and the biodegradability of the polymers were confirmed by subcutaneous implantation of polymer foils in rats.

The newly developed polymers, two polyesters (DegraPol/bsc43 and DegraPol/bsd43) and a polyesterether (DegraPol/bst41), were found to exhibit good cell compatibility; the cell-to-substrate interactions induced neither cytotoxic effects nor activation of macrophages.

The adhesion and growth of fibroblasts and macrophages were different among the substrate. Fibroblasts adhered on the polyesters to about 60% of control cell cultured on tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) and proliferated in the same doubling time as on TCPS. On the polyetherester cells exhibited weak adhesion; however, they proliferated up to day 4 after plating at the same doubling time as on TCPS (of about 42 h), and then decreased their doubling time to 27 h. Macrophages attached to the polyesters to about 40–60% of TCPS but no significant change was seen in the doubling time of cells cultured on TCPS and the polyesters. Again on the polyetherester, macrophages exhibited relatively low adhesion (25% of TCPS) and high doubling time (about 100 h).

Fibroblasts produced high amounts (up to 500% of control cells) of collagen type I and type IV, and fibronectin. Macrophages responded to lipopolysaccharide treatment by the production of nitric oxide (NO) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), indicating that the cell-to-polymer interactions allow fibroblasts and macrophages to maintain their phenotype.

All three test polymers exhibit favourable tissue compatibility. The formed capsule was just a few cell layers thick (<30 μm). After 2 months implanted subcutaneously in rats, the molecular weight of the test polymers was reduced by >20% depending on their chemical structure.

Taken collectively, the present data demonstrate that the newly developed multiblock copolyesters are biocompatible and biodegradable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. DUMITRIU, “Polymeric biomaterials”, edited by S. Dumitriu (M. Dekker, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. M. ANDERSON, Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2 (1993) 33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. J. DARLINGTON, D. R. WILSON and B. LACHMAN, J. Cell Biol. 103 (1986) 787.

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. M. CALLERY, T. KAMEI and M. W. FLYE, Circ. Shock 37 (1992) 185.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Y. TABATA and Y. IKATA, Adv. Polym. Sci. 94 (1990) 108.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. VERT, P. CHRISTEL and F. CHABOT, in “Macromolecular biomaterials”, edited by C. W. Hastings and P. Ducheyene (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. P. CHRISTEL, F. CHABOT and M. VERT, in Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Biomaterials, edited by J. M. Anderson (Society of Biomaterials, 1984) p. 279.

  8. P. ROKKANEN, O. BOSTMAN, S. VAINIONPAA, K. VITHONEN, P. TORMALA, J. LAIHO, J. KILPIKARI and M. TAMMINMAKI, Lancet 1 (1985) 1442.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. BERCOVY, D. GOUTALLIER, M. C., VOISIN, D. GEIGER, D. BLANQUAERT, A. GAUDICHET and D. PATTE, Clin. Orthop. 159 (1985).

  10. D. K. GILDING and A. M. REED, Polymer 20 (1979) 1459.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Y. IMAI, in “Biomedical applied polymer materials”, edited by T. Tsuruta, T. Hayashi, K. Kataoka, K. Ishihara and Y. Kimura (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1993) p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. O. M. KEISER, P. NEUENSCHWANDER and U. W. SUTER (1996) in preparation.

  13. T. D. HIRT, P. NEUENSCHWANDER and U. W. SUTER, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 197 (1996) 1609.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. SAAD, G. CIARDELLI, S. MATTER, M. WELTI, G. K. UHLSCHMID, P. NEUENSCHWANDER and U. W. SUTER, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 30 (1996) 429.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. H. DING, C. F. NATHAN and D. J. STUEHR, J. Immunol. 141 (1988) 2407.

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. ESPEVIK and J. NISSEN-MEYER, J. Immunol. Methods 95 (1986) 99.

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. M. BRADFORD, Anal. Biochem. 72 (1976) 248.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. SAAD, F. A. SCHOLL, H. THOMAS, H. P. SCHAWALDER, V. STREIT, F. WAECHTER and P. MAIER, Eur. J. Biochem. 213 (1993) 805.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. M. EDELMAN, B. A. CUNNINGHAM and J. P. THIERY, “Morphoregulatory molecules” (Wiley, New York, 1990) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. F. GRINNELL, in “Growth and maturation factors”, edited by G. Guroff (John Wiley, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. H. ALBELDA and C. A. BUCK, FASEB J. 4 (1990) 2868.

    Google Scholar 

  22. E. G. HAYMAN, M. D. PIERSBACHER, Y. OHGREN and E. ROUSLATHI, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 80 (1983) 4003.

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. M. CUNANAN, N. M. TARBAUX and P. M. KNIGHT, J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 17 (1991) 767.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Y. TAMADA and Y. IKADA, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 28 (1994) 783.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SAAD , B., KEISER , O.M., WELTI , M. et al. Multiblock copolyesters as biomaterials: in vitro biocompatibility testing. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 8, 497–505 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018582311361

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018582311361

Keywords

Navigation