Skip to main content
Log in

When “Community” Is Not Enough: Institutions and Values in Community-Based Forest Management in Southern Indiana

  • Published:
Human Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community-based management is increasingly viewed as the most appropriate arrangement for promoting sustainable development of natural resources. A common assumption is that the values of community members, often assumed to be homogeneous, foster successful outcomes. However, analysts often treat these values and their homogeneity as exogenous factors, ignoring the community's potential role in managing members' values. This study of community-based forest management in two southern Indiana sites examines how the members of the two communities created institutions to screen, maintain, and defend their values. Analysis reveals that different institutions shaped members' preferences and led to different levels of community stability, conflict management, and natural resource condition. We argue that understanding community-based management processes and outcomes requires careful attention to how institutions facilitate or hamper the construction of community members' values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Agrawal, A. (1997). Community in Conservation. Working Paper No. 1. Conservation and Development Forum, University of Florida, Gainesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. Greener Pastures: Exchange, Politics, and Community Among a Mobile Pastoral People. Durham, Duke University (forthcoming).

  • Agrawal, A., and Gibson, C. C. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development (forthcoming).

  • Arnold, J. E. M. (1990). Social forestry and communal management in India. Social Forestry Network Paper 11b, Overseas Development Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, W. (1995). Communities and Sustainable Forestry in Developing Countries. ICS Press, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F. (ed.) (1989). Common Property Resources: Ecology and Community Based Sustainable Development. Belhaven Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D. (ed.) (1992). Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice and Policy. Institute for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1972). The household as Achilles' heel. Journal of Consumer Affairs 6: 111-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancian, F. (1989). Economic behavior in peasant communities. In Plattner, S. (ed.), Economic Anthropology. Stanford University Press, Stanford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clugston, R. M., and Rogers, T. J. (1995). Sustainable livelihoods in North America. Development 3(Sept.): 60-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A. (1985). The Symbolic Construction of Community. Tavistock Publications, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei, G. J. S. (1992). A forest beyond the trees: Tree cutting in rural Ghana. Human Ecology 20(1): 57-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Castro, F., Futema, C., and Koontz, T. (1996). Nature Conservation through Self-Governance: The “Maple” Community. Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglass, M. (1992). The political economy of urban poverty and environmental management in Asia: Access, empowerment and community based alternatives. Environment and Urbanization 4(2): 9-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckholm, E. (1976). Losing Ground: Environmental Stress and World Food Prospects. W.W. Norton & Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic Behavior and Institutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellizar, F. P., Jr., and Oya, K. (1994). Achieving sustainable development through community-based resource management. Regional Development Dialogue 15(1): 201-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, G. M. (1965). Peasant society and the image of limited good. American Anthropologist 67: 293-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg, D., and Maskin, E. (1986). The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica 54: 533-556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghai, D. (1993). Conservation, livelihood and democracy: Social dynamics of environmental change in Africa. Osterreichische Zeitschrift fur Soziologie 18: 56-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusky, D. B. (1994). The contours of social stratification. In Grusky, D. (ed.), Social Stratification: Class, Race and Gender in Sociological Perspective. Westview Press, Boulder, Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFRI (1996). Field Manual. Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Version 8.0, Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R., and Libecap, G. (1982). Contracting problems and regulation: The case of the fishery. American Economic Review 72(5): 1005-1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, A. ed. (1990). Living with Wildlife: Wildlife Resource Management with Local Participation in Africa. The World Bank, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleymeyer, C. D. (1994). Cultural traditions and Community-based Conservation. In Western, D., and Wright, R. M. (eds.), Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maple Community (1987). Rules and Regulations, Sections I & II.

  • McCay, B. J., and Acheson, J. (eds.). (1987). The Question of the Commons: The Culture and Ecology of Communal Resources. The University of Arizona Press, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKean, M. (1992). Success on the commons: A comparative examination of institutions for common property resource management. Journal of Theoretical Politics 4(3): 247-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphree, M. (1994). The role of institutions in community-based conservation. In Western, D., and Wright, R. M. (eds.), Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netting, R. Mc. (1981). Balancing on an Alp. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakerson, R. (1992). Analyzing the commons. In Bromley, D. (ed.), Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice and Policy. Institute for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco, pp. 41-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1992). The rudiments of a theory of the origin, survival, and performance of common property institutions. In Bromley, D. (ed.), Crafting Institutions for Self-Governing Irrigation Systems. Institute for Contemporary Studies, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., and Walker, J. (1994). Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (1992). Tropical Rain forests. Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (1988). The sustainable use of natural resource in developing countries. In Turner, K. (ed.), Sustainable Environmental Management. Pinter, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. A., and Dixon, R. K. (1986). An interdisciplinary approach to community resource management: Preliminary field test in Thailand. Journal of Developing Areas 21(1): 31-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, P. (1994). Dividing the Commons: Politics, Policy and Culture in Botswana. University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poffenberger, M. (1994). The resurgence of community forest management in Eastern India. In Western, D., and Wright, R. M. (eds.). (1994). Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, D. (1981). Equalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven, P. (1991). Winners and losers in the twentieth-century struggle to survive. In Davis, K., and Bernstam, M. (eds.), Resources, Environment, and Population: Present Knowledge, Future Options. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford, K. (1990). The ecologically noble savage. Cultural Survival Quarterly 15(1): 46-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. (1995). Towards a new paradigm of community development. Community Development Journal 30(1): 21-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge. C. F. (1981). Common property externalities: Isolation, assurance and resource depletion in a traditional grazing context. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63: 595-606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runge, C. F. (1984). Institutions and free rider: The assurance problem of collective action. Journal of Politics 46: 154-181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1992). Inequality Reexamined. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singleton, S., and Taylor, M. (1992). Common property, collective action and community. Journal of Theoretical Politics 4(3): 309-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, J. S., Jr., Kingsley, N. P., and Mayer, R. V. (1990). Indiana's Timber Resource, 1986: An Analysis. USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Experimental Station, Resource Bulletin NC-113, St. Paul, Minnesota.

  • Stevenson, G. G. (1991). Common Property Economics: A General Theory and Land Use Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (1982). Community, Anarchy and Liberty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1987). Village Republics: Economic Condition s for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissing, F., and Ostrom, E. (1991). Irrigation institutions and the games irrigators play: Rule enforcement without guards. In Reinhard, S. (ed.), Game Equilibrium Models I: Evolution and Game Dynamics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, D. (1992). Ecosystem conservation and rural development: The case of Amboseli. In Western, D., and Wright, R. M. (eds.), Natural Connection s: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, D., and Wright, R. M. (eds.) (1994). Natural Connections: Perspectives in Community-based Conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. (1992). The Diversity of Life. W.W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner, B. (1990). Harvest of sustainability: Recent books on environmental management. Journal of Development Studies 26: 355-341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, E. R. (1986). The vicissitudes of the closed corporate peasant community. American Ethnologist 13: 325-329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y773 Research Seminar. (1996). The “Oak” Community and Its Forest: A Site Report Prepared for the “Oak” Community. Indiana University, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibson, C.C., Koontz, T. When “Community” Is Not Enough: Institutions and Values in Community-Based Forest Management in Southern Indiana. Human Ecology 26, 621–647 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018701525978

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018701525978

Navigation