Skip to main content
Log in

Acting Out Against Gender Discrimination: The Effects of Different Social Identities

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Self-categorization theory suggests thatwhen asocialidentity is salient,grouporiented behavior willensue. Thus, women should be likely to actoutagainstgender discrimination when their social identity as women is salient. However,self-categorization theory has typically defined asocial identity along stereotypes, which may serveinstead to maintain the status quo. Two studiestherefore examined the effects of two different social identities ontaking action against discrimination. Participants werefemale students (Anglo American (93%), African American(2%), Native American (2%), Hispanic (1%), Asian American (1%)and Other (1%)). Study 1 examineda structural model and Study 2 examined the causalrelationships, both hypothesizing that a social identitybased on stereotypes would be associated with less collective action than a social identity basedon social experiences. The hypothesis was supported, andimplications for expanding definitions of socialidentities were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bartky, S. L. (1977). Toward a phenomenology of feminist consciousness. In M. Vetterling-Braggin, F. Elliston,& J. English (Eds.), Feminism and philosophy. Totawa, NJ: Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariances structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P.M., & Wu, E. J. C. (1995). EQS for windows user's guide. Encino,CA: Multivariate Software, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, G., & Duelli Klein, R. (1983). Theories of women's studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer,M. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation:A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B.M. (1989). A primer of LISREL:Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1994a). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 289–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (1994b). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, P. (1980). Personal is political. Canadian Women's Studies, 2, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. J. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. J. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driefus, C. (1973). Women's fate: Rap from a feminist consciousness-raisin g group. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. D., & Matheson, K. (1995). Double relative deprivation: Combining the personal and political. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1167–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M.D., & Matheson, K. (1998). Perceiving and feeling personal discrimination:Motivation or Inhibition for social action.Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1, 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. D., Matheson, K., & Poole, M. (1994). Responding to sexual discrimination: The effects of societal versus self-blame. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 743–754.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D., & McAdam, D. (1992). Networks, choices and the life of a social movement. In A. D. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. A. (1992). The social psychology of collective action. In A. D. Morris, & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, I. W., & Gutek, B. A. (1982). Attributions and assignment of responsibility in sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalonde, R. N., & Silverman, R. A. (1994). Behavioral preferences in response to social injustice: The effects of group permeability and social identity salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 78–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. T. (1992). Ingroup preference and similarities among African American and Chinese American Studies. Journal of Social Psychology, 133, 225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neto, F. (1995). Knowledge of sex stereotypes and internality. Psychological Reports, 76, 504–506.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, P. J., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Is limited information processing capacity the cause of social stereotyping? In W. Stroeb & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology: Vol. 1. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice: A study of attitudes to social inequality in twentieth century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking out: Feminist consciousness and feminist research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephan, W. G. (1977). Cognitive differentiation in intergroup perception. Sociometry, 40, 50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, J. S., & Huba, G. J. (1989). A general coefficient of determination for covariance structure models under arbitrary GLS estimation. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. M., & McKirnan, D. J. (1984). A five-stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 291–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., Moghaddam, F. M., & Lalonde, R. N. (1990). The personal/ group discrimination discrepancy: Perceiving my group, but not myself, to be a target for discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 254–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in Group Processes, 2, 77–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D.,& Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A theory of self-categorization. New York: Basil Blackwell, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1986). The significance of the social identity concept for social psychology with reference to individualism, interactionism, and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-categorization theory and social influence. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J. Haslam, A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 454–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, N.,& Schneider, M. (1990). The developmentof a feminist consciousness in women: work in progress. Paper presented at the Canadian Psychological Association Annual Conference, Ottawa, Canada.

  • Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantage d group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 994–1003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foster, M.D. Acting Out Against Gender Discrimination: The Effects of Different Social Identities. Sex Roles 40, 167–186 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018842803813

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018842803813

Keywords

Navigation