Skip to main content
Log in

Work and Pregnancy: Individual and Organizational Factors Influencing Organizational Commitment, Timing of Maternity Leave, and Return to Work

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The authors surveyed 86 pregnant women (73%White, 8% Asian, 7% African American, 6% Hispanic, and1% Native American) to examine individual andorganizational factors associated with organizationalcommitment and planned timing of their maternity leavesand return to work after childbirth. Women whoseorganizations offered guaranteed jobs after childbirthplanned to work later into their pregnancies and toreturn to work sooner after childbirth. Women whoperceived supportive work-family cultures were morecommitted to their organizations and planned to returnmore quickly after childbirth than women who perceived less supportive cultures. Also, women with lesstraditional attitudes toward parenting planned to worklater into their pregnancies and return to work soonerafter childbirth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gende red organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amstey, F. H., & Whitbourne, S. K. (1988). Work and mothe rhood: Transition to parenthood and women's employment. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 149, 111–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, L. (1997). The impact of corporate culture on work-family integration. In S. Parasuraman & J. H. Greenhaus (Eds.), Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world (pp. 209–219). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, B. R. (1986). The economic emergence of women. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, F. D., Ferber, M. A., & Winkler, A. E. (1998). The economics of women, men,and work (3rd ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, N. R. (1997, February 24). Careers/management: Managers often at odds with familyfriendly perks; Corporate attempts to provide flexible work options can fall victim to supervisors unwilling or unable to implement them, experts say. Los Angeles Times,pp. SS, 13:I LA.

  • Caudill, H. L. (1994, August). The pregnant employee: A missing person in management research. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Dallas, Texas.

  • Clarke, R., Hyde, J. S., Essex, M. J., & Klein, M. H. (1997). Length of maternity leave and quality of mother-infant interactions. Child Development, 68, 364–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., Hooks, K., & McGuire, T. (1997). Gaining legitimacy for flexible work arrangements and career paths: The business case for public accounting and professional services firms. In S. Parasuraman & J.H. Greenhaus (Eds.), Integrating work and family:Challenges and choices for a changing world (pp. 154–166). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covin, T. J., & Brush, C. C. (1991). An examination of male and female attitudes toward career and family issues. Sex Roles, 25, 393–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, S., & Waite, L. J. (1991). Women's employme nt during pregnancy and after the first birth: Occupational characteristics and work commitment. American Sociological Review, 56, 551–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowdall, J. A. (1974). Structural and attitudinal factors associated with female labor force participation. Social Science Quarterly, 55, 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, S. K., Olswang, S., & She, N. (1994). Childbirth, tenure, and promotion for women faculty. Review of Higher Education, 17, 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, D. E., & Johnson, A. A. (1997). Moving from programs to culture change: The next stage for the corporate work-family agenda. In S. Parasuraman & J. H. Greenhaus (Eds.), Integrating work and family: Challenges and choices for a changing world (pp. 192–208). Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, K. (1989). Long-held bias impedes efforts to support work/family needs. Business-Link, 4, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass Ceiling Commission. (1995). Good for business: Making full use of the nation's human capital.Washington, DC: Author.

  • Glass, J. (1988). Job quits and job changes: The effects of young women's work conditions and family factors. Gender and Society, 2, 228–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J. L., & Riley, L. (1998). Family responsive policies and employee retention following childbirth. Social Forces, 76, 1401–1435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberger, E., Goldberg, W. A., Hamill, S., O'Neil, R., & Payne, C. K. (1989). Contributions of a supportive work environment to parents'well-being and orientation to work. American Journal of Community Psychology, 17, 755–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. (1989). Human capital, marital and birth timing, and the postnatal labor force participation of married women. Jo urnal of Family Issues, 10, 359–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenstein, T. N. (1986). Social-psychological factors in perinatal labor-force participation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 565–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S. L., & Crooker, K. J. (1995). Who appreciate s family-re sponsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48, 271–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueutal, H. G., Luciano, J., & Michaels, C. A. (1995). Pregnancy in the workplace: Does pregnancy affect performance appraisal ratings. Journ al of Business an d Psycho logy, 10, 155–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gueutal, H. G., & Taylor, E. M. (1991). Employe e pregnancy: The impact on organizations, pregnant employee s and co-workers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 5, 459–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpert, J. A., & Burg, J. H. (1997). Mixed messages: Co-worker re sponses to the pregnant employee. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12, 241–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpert, J. A., Wilson, M. L., & Hickman, J. L. (1993). Pregnancy as a source of bias in performance appraisals. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 649–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammonds, K. H. (1997, Septembe r 15). Work and family: Business Week's second survey of family-friendly corporate policies. Business Week, pp. 96–99, 102–104.

  • Harris, D. (1992, August). You're pregnant? You're out.Working Woman, pp. 48, 50–51, 74, 76.

  • Hrebiniak, L. G., & Alutto, J. A. (1972). Personal and role-related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Scien ce Quarterly, 17, 555–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K. A. (1991, February 6). Pregnant professionals face pressures at work as attitudes toward them shift. Wall Street Journal, pp. B1, B5.

  • Hyde, J. S., Klein, M. H., Essex, M. J., & Clark, R. (1995). Maternity leave and women's mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joesch, J. M. (1997). Paid leave and the timing of women's employme nt before and after birth. Journ al of Marriage and the Family, 59, 1008–10021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judiesch, M. K., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). Left behind? Impact of leave s of absence on managers' career success. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 641–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klerman, J. A., & Leibowitz, A. (1994). The work-employment distinction among new mothers. Journal of Human Resources, 29, 277–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S., & Cooper, C. L. (1998). The transition to parenthood in dual-earner couples. Psychological Medicine, 18, 477–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S., & Taylor, K. (1996). Evaluating the impact of family-friendly employer policies: A case study. In S. Lewis & J. Lewis (Eds.), The work family challenge: Rethinking employment (pp. 112–127). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequence s of organizational commitment. Psych ological Bulletin, 108, 171–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, S.D. (1982).Differential patterns of female labor-force participation surrounding the first birth. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 407–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P.,& Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the “side-bet theory”of organizational commitment: Some me thodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 372–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Jewish Women. (1987). Accommodating pregnancy in the workplace. New York: Author.

  • National Council of Jewish Women. (1988). Employer supports for child care. New York: Author.

  • Perlow, L. A. (1995). Putting the work back into work/family. Group and Organization Management, 20, 227–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellenbarger, S. (1998, January 14). Recent suits make pregnancy issues workplace priorities. Wall Street Journal, p. B1.

  • Starrels, M. E. (1992). The evolution of workplace family policy research. Journal of Family Issues, 13, 259–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiss, D. J. (1996). Women breaking through: Overcoming the final 10 obstacles at work. Princeton, NJ: Peterson's /Pace setter Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swiss, D. J., & Walker, J. P. (1993). Women an d the work /family dilemma: How today's professional women are confronting the maternal wall. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. A., Beauvais, L. L., & Lyness, K. S. (1999). When work-family benefits are not enough: The influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work-family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 54, 392–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. A., & Francesco, A.M. (1996). Valuing diversity: The case of pregnant working women in the United States. Equal Opportunities International, 15(4), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. A., Thomas, C. C., & Maier, M. (1992). Work-family conflict and the bottom line: Reassessing corporate policies and initiatives. In U. Sekaran & F. T. Leong (Eds.), Woman power: Managing in times of demographic turbulence (pp. 59–84). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldfogel, J. (1998). The family gap for young women in the United States and Britain: Can maternity leave make a difference? Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 505–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbel, J. (1998). Intent and choice regarding maternal employme nt following childbirth. Journal of Vocation al Behavior, 53, 372–385.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lyness, K.S., Thompson, C.A., Francesco, A.M. et al. Work and Pregnancy: Individual and Organizational Factors Influencing Organizational Commitment, Timing of Maternity Leave, and Return to Work. Sex Roles 41, 485–508 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018887119627

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018887119627

Keywords

Navigation