Skip to main content
Log in

Competitiveness of biomass‐fueled electrical power plants

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One way countries like the United States can comply with suggested rollbacks in greenhouse gas emissions is by employing power plants fueled with biomass. We examine the competitiveness of biomass‐based fuel for electrical power as opposed to coal using a mathematical programming structure. We consider fueling power plants from milling residues, whole trees, logging residues, switch grass, or short‐rotation woody crops. We do this using a combined model of the agricultural and forestry sectors. We find that the competitiveness of biomass depends in a key way upon the success of research in developing improved production methods for short‐rotation woody crops without great increases in costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Adams, R. Alig, J.M. Callaway, B.A. McCarl and S. Winnett, The forest and agricultural sector optimization model (FASOM): Model structure and policy applications, USDA Forest Service Research Paper PNW-495, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Adams, R. Alig and B.A. McCarl, An analysis of the impacts of public timber harvest policies on private forest management in the U.S., Forest Science 42 (1996) 343-358.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Adams and R. Haynes, The 1993 timber assessment market model: Structure, projections, and policy simulations, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-368, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.S. Baumes and B.A. McCarl, Linear programming and social welfare: Model formulation and objective function alternatives, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 26 (1978) 53-60.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Brooke, D. Kendrick and A. Meeraus, GAMS: A User's Guide, Release 2.25 (The Scientific Press, San Francisco, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Chang, B.A. McCarl, J. Mjelde and J. Richardson, Sectoral implications of farm program modifications, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 74 (1992) 38-49.

    Google Scholar 

  7. CPLEX Optimization Inc., Using the CPLEX Callable Library (1994).

  8. L.S. Davis and K.N. Johnson, Forest Management, 3rd edn (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  9. DOE (U.S. Department of Energy), Annual Energy Outlook (Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.E. Evenson, Adjusting partial factor productivity measures to reflect total factor productivity in U.S. agriculture, Unpublished paper, Yale University (1993).

  11. B.C. French, Some considerations in estimating assembly cost functions for agricultural processing operations, Journal of Farm Economics 62 (1960) 767-778.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.L. Graham, E. Lichtenberg, V. Roningen, H. Shapouri and M. Walsh, The economics of biomass production in the united states, Working Report from the BioFuels Feedstock Development Program, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, posted on world wide web as http://www.esd.ornl. gov/bfdp/papers/bioam95/graham3.html (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Haynes, D. Adams and J. Mills, The 1993 RPA timber assessment update, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-259, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Ince, Recycling and long-range timber outlook, USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-242, Rocky Mountain, Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. D. Kline, T. Hargrove and C. Vanderlan, The treatment of biomass fuels in carbon emissions trading systems, Prepared for the Center for Clean Air Policy's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Braintrust (1988).

  16. R. Kopp, How to interpret energy data and understand its role in policy, paper distributed through http://www.weathervane.rff.org/numbers/primer1.html, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  17. B.A. McCarl, Cropping activities in agricultural sector models: A methodological proposal, American Journal Agricultural Economics 64 (1982) 768-772.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B.A. McCarl, C.C. Chang, J.D. Atwood and W.I. Nayda, Documentation of ASM: The U.S. agricultural sector model, Unpublished paper, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A & M University (1994).

  19. B. McCarl and T. Spreen, Price endogenous mathematical programming as a tool for sector analysis, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62 (1980) 87-102.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B.A. Murtagh and M.A. Saunders, MINOS 5.1 User's Guide, Systems Optimization Lab., Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Report SOL 83-20R (December 1983; revised January 1987).

  21. Optimization Subroutine Library (OSL), IBM Guide and Reference, Release 2, eds. J.A. Georg e and J.W.H. Liu (IBM Corporation, 1990-91).

  22. R. Sedjo and K. Lyon, The Long-Term Adequacy of World Timber Supply, Resources for the Future (Washington, DC, 1990).

  23. T. Spreen, B. McCarl and T. White, Modeling the cattle subsector: A demonstration in Guyana, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 28 (1980) 17-32.

    Google Scholar 

  24. J.T. Turnure, S. Winnett, R. Shackleton and W. Hohenstein, Biomass electricity: Long-run economic prospects and climate policy implications, Unpublished paper U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy Analysis, Washington, DC (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  25. U.S. Department of Energy, Emissions of Greenhouse Gases in the United States 1996, Energy Information Administration, Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, US Department of Energy, Washington, DC, posted on world wide web as http://www.preen.org/eiagg97/front.html. DOE/EIA-0573(96) (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  26. M.E. Walsh and R. Graham, Biomass feedstock supply analysis: Production costs, land availability, yields, Working report from the BioFuels Feedstock Development Program, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCarl, B.A., Adams, D.M., Alig, R.J. et al. Competitiveness of biomass‐fueled electrical power plants. Annals of Operations Research 94, 37–55 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018929402930

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018929402930

Keywords

Navigation