Skip to main content
Log in

Voting mechanisms and their implications in a GDSS environment

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There comes a time in most group discussions that a decision has to be made. This is the role most often filled by the voting process. Through computer and telecommunication technology, new capabilities have been added to this age old process. It is important to understand the implications of these new capabilities and the voting process as a whole to fully take advantage of the opportunities and avoid the pitfalls they provide. This paper investigates the implications of voting in a group decision support system (GDSS) environ-ment. Procedural and operational issues related to the voting process are identified. These issues are used to compare and contrast a number of voting protocols. Many of the protocols have been implemented and tested in the CM3 (Computer Mediated Meeting Management) group decision support system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.J. Aumann, Game theory, in: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman, eds., MacMillion, London, 1987, pp. 460–482.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Bonner, Introduction to the Theory of Social Choice, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Brams and P. Fishburn, Approval Voting, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C.H. Coombs, A Theory of Data, Wiley, New York, 1964, Chapter 18.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Dennis, J. Nunamaker, Jr. and D. Paranka, Supporting the search for competitive advantage, Journal of Management Information Systems 8(1991)5–36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Dennis, J. Nunamaker, Jr. and D.R. Vogel, A comparison of laboratory and field research in the study of electronic meeting systems, Journal of Management Information Systems 7(1990–91) 107–135.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. DeSanctis and R.B. Gallupe, A foundation for the study of Group Decision Support Systems, Management Science 33(1987)589–609.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Dufner, S.R. Hiltz, K. Johnson and R. Czech, Distributed group support: Effects of voting tools on group perceptions of media richness, Group Decision and Negotiation 4(1995)235–250.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Dummett, Voting Procedures, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G.K. Easton, J.F. George, J.F. Nunamaker, Jr. and M.O. Pendergast, Using two different electronic meeting system tools for the same task: An experimental comparison, Journal of Management Information Systems 7(1990)85–100.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.S. Felsenthal, Topics in Social Choice, Sophisticated Voting, Efficacy, and Proportional Representation, Praeger, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Fishburn, The Theory of Social Choice, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Fishburn, Paradoxes of voting, American Political Review 68(1974)537–546.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Fishburn, Monotonicity paradoxes in the theory of elections, Discrete Applied Mathematics 4(1982)119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Fishburn and W. Gehrlein, Borda's rule, positional voting and Condorcet's simple majority principle, Public Choice 28(1976)79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N.M. Fraser and K.W. Hipel, Conflict Analysis Models and Resolutions, North-Holland Series in System Science and Engineering, Vol. 11, North-Holland, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.B. Gallupe and G. DeSanctis, Computer-based support for group problem-finding: An experimental investigation, MIS Quarterly (1988)277–296.

  18. B. Gavish and J.H. Gerdes, Jr., Mechanisms for maintaining anonymity in a GDSS environment, Working Paper, 1996.

  19. B. Gavish, J. Gerdes and S. Sridhar, CM 3, Looking into the third and fourth dimensions of GDSS, in: Integration: Information and Collaboration Models, S.Y. Nof, ed., Kluwer Academic, NATO ASI Series, 1994, pp. 269–299.

  20. B. Gavish, J. Gerdes and S. Sridhar, CM 3, A distributed Group Decision Support System, IIE Transactions (December 1995).

  21. B. Gavish, J. Gerdes, Jr. and J. Kalvenes, Reward allocation mechanisms in anonymous GDSS, Working Paper, 1996.

  22. B. Gavish and J. Kalvenes, Anonymous rewarding in Group Decision Support Systems and its implications, Working Paper, 1996.

  23. J. George, J. Nunamaker, Jr. and D. Vogel, Group Decision Support Systems and their implications for designers and managers: The Arizona experience, Transactions of the 8th International Conference on Decision Support Systems, Boston, MA, June 1988, pp. 13–25.

  24. L. Guinier, The representation of minority interests: The question of single member districts, Cardozo Law Review 14(1993)1135–1174.

    Google Scholar 

  25. T. Hare, Treatise on the Election of Representatives, Parliamentary and Municipal, Longmans Green, London, 1859.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S.R. Hiltz and M. Turoff, Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload, Communications of the ACM 28(1985)680–689.

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Korhonen, H. Moskowitz, J. Wallenius and S. Zionts, An interactive approach to multiple criteria optimization with multiple decision-makers, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 33(1986)589–602.

    Google Scholar 

  28. K.L. Kraemer and J.L. King, Computer-based systems for co-operative work and group decision making, ACM Computing Surveys 20(1988)115–146.

    Google Scholar 

  29. W.B. Ludwin, Strategic voting and the Borda method, Public Choice 33(1978)85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Merrill, III, Making Multi-candidate Elections More Democratic, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  31. H. Moulin, The Strategy of Social Choice, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1983, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  32. H. Moulin, Fairness and strategy in voting, in: Fair Allocation, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics, H.P. Young, ed., American Mathematical Society, 1985, pp. 109–142.

  33. D.C. Mueller, Public Choice II, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  34. R.B. Myerson, Game Theory, Analysis of Conflict, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  35. R.G. Niemi and W.H. Riker, The choice of voting systems, Scientific American 234(1976)21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  36. T. Noah, Despite loss, Perot may continue to play role in U.S. politics, Wall Street Journal, Nov. 4, 1992, p. A16 c4.

  37. J.F. Nunamaker, Jr., A.R. Dennis, J.S. Valacich, D. Vogel and J.F. George, Electronic meeting systems to support group work, Communication of the ACM 34(1991)40–61.

    Google Scholar 

  38. M.S. Poole, M. Holmes and G. Desanctis, Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting environment, Management Science 37(1991)926–959.

    Google Scholar 

  39. A. Reeve and A. Ware, Electoral Systems; A Comparative and Theoretical Introduction, Routledge, London, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J.A. Richelson, Comparative analysis of social choice functions, Behavioral Science 20(1975) 331–337.

    Google Scholar 

  41. W. Riker, Liberalism Against Populism, Freemand and Co., San Francisco, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  42. D. Saari, The Borda dictionary, Social Choice and Welfare 7(1990)279–317.

    Google Scholar 

  43. P.D. Straffin, Jr., Topics in the Theory of Voting, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  44. H.P. Young, Social choice scoring functions, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 28(1975) 824–838.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gavish, B., Gerdes, J.H. Voting mechanisms and their implications in a GDSS environment. Annals of Operations Research 71, 41–74 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018931801461

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018931801461

Navigation