Skip to main content
Log in

The relationship between market orientation and performance in the hospital industry: A structural equations modeling approach

  • Published:
Health Care Management Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is general consensus in the research literature that market orientation is related to organizational performance. This study examines this relationship in the hospital industry. One unique feature of this study is that both market orientation and performance are conceptualized as being multi-dimensional constructs. Hence the technique of Structural Equations Modeling (SEM) is used to examine the relationship. Analyses were based on market orientation and performance data obtained from 175 hospitals in a five-state region of the United States. The SEM results confirm the multi-dimensional nature of both market orientation and performance, and the strong relationship between the constructs. Interestingly, this relationship is found to be much stronger for smaller hospitals than for larger hospitals. Implications for the hospital industry are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.C. Narver and S.F. Slater, The effect of market orientation on business profitability, Journal of Marketing 54 (Oct. 1990) 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J.K. Han, N. Kim and R. Srivastava, Marketing orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link?, Journal of Marketing 62 (Oct. 1998) 30–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R.F. Lusch and G.R. Laczniak, The evolving marketing concept, competitive intensity, and organizational performance, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 15 (Fall 1987) 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.K. Kohli and B.J. Jaworski, Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications, Journal of Marketing 54 (April 1990) 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B.P. Shapiro, What the hell is ‘market oriented’?, Harvard Business Review 66 (Nov.-Dec. 1988) 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Kotler and R.N. Clarke, Marketing for Health Care Organizations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.K. Kohli, B.J. Jaworski and A. Kumar, MARKOR: a measure of market orientation, Journal of Marketing Research 30 (Nov. 1993) 467–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S.M. Shortell, J.L. O'Brien, J.M. Carman and R.W. Foster, Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: concept versus implementation, Health Services Research 30(2) (1995) 377–401.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M.A. Counte, G.L. Glandon, D.M. Oleske and J.P. Hill, Improving hospital performance: issues in assessing the impact of TQM activities, Hospital and Health Services Administration 40(1) (1995) 80–94.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W.R. Scott and S.M. Shortell, Organizational performance: managing for efficiency and effectiveness, in: Health Care Management: A Text in Organization Theory and Behavior, eds. S.M. Shortell and A.D. Kaluzny (Wiley, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.R. McDermott, F.J. Franzak and M.W. Little, Does marketing relate to hospital profitability? Journal of Health Care Marketing 13(2) (1993) 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.S. Raju, S.C. Lonial and Y.P. Gupta, Market orientation and performance in the hospital industry, Journal of Healthcare Marketing 15(4) (1995) 34–41.

    Google Scholar 

  13. F.D. Wolinsky, The Sociology of Health: Principles, Practitioners, and Issues, 2nd ed. (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. B.J. Jaworksi and A.K. Kohli, Market orientation: antecedents and consequences, Journal of Marketing 57 (July 1993) 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Kumar, R. Subramanian and C. Yauger, Performance-oriented: toward a successful strategy, Marketing Health Services (Summer 1997) 10–20.

  16. J.C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham and W.C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th ed. (Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.L. Arbuckle, Amos User's Guide, Version 3.6 (Small Waters Corp., Chicago, IL, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  19. K.A. Bollen, Structural Equations with Latent Variables (Wiley, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Leamer, Specification Searches (Wiley, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.S. Long, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Sage, Beverly Hills, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Sharma, Applied Multivariate Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raju, P., Lonial, S.C., Gupta, Y.P. et al. The relationship between market orientation and performance in the hospital industry: A structural equations modeling approach. Health Care Management Science 3, 237–247 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019061912075

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019061912075

Navigation