Abstract
There is general consensus in the research literature that market orientation is related to organizational performance. This study examines this relationship in the hospital industry. One unique feature of this study is that both market orientation and performance are conceptualized as being multi-dimensional constructs. Hence the technique of Structural Equations Modeling (SEM) is used to examine the relationship. Analyses were based on market orientation and performance data obtained from 175 hospitals in a five-state region of the United States. The SEM results confirm the multi-dimensional nature of both market orientation and performance, and the strong relationship between the constructs. Interestingly, this relationship is found to be much stronger for smaller hospitals than for larger hospitals. Implications for the hospital industry are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.C. Narver and S.F. Slater, The effect of market orientation on business profitability, Journal of Marketing 54 (Oct. 1990) 20–35.
J.K. Han, N. Kim and R. Srivastava, Marketing orientation and organizational performance: is innovation a missing link?, Journal of Marketing 62 (Oct. 1998) 30–45.
R.F. Lusch and G.R. Laczniak, The evolving marketing concept, competitive intensity, and organizational performance, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 15 (Fall 1987) 1–11.
A.K. Kohli and B.J. Jaworski, Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications, Journal of Marketing 54 (April 1990) 1–18.
B.P. Shapiro, What the hell is ‘market oriented’?, Harvard Business Review 66 (Nov.-Dec. 1988) 119–125.
P. Kotler and R.N. Clarke, Marketing for Health Care Organizations (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987).
A.K. Kohli, B.J. Jaworski and A. Kumar, MARKOR: a measure of market orientation, Journal of Marketing Research 30 (Nov. 1993) 467–477.
S.M. Shortell, J.L. O'Brien, J.M. Carman and R.W. Foster, Assessing the impact of continuous quality improvement/total quality management: concept versus implementation, Health Services Research 30(2) (1995) 377–401.
M.A. Counte, G.L. Glandon, D.M. Oleske and J.P. Hill, Improving hospital performance: issues in assessing the impact of TQM activities, Hospital and Health Services Administration 40(1) (1995) 80–94.
W.R. Scott and S.M. Shortell, Organizational performance: managing for efficiency and effectiveness, in: Health Care Management: A Text in Organization Theory and Behavior, eds. S.M. Shortell and A.D. Kaluzny (Wiley, New York, 1983).
D.R. McDermott, F.J. Franzak and M.W. Little, Does marketing relate to hospital profitability? Journal of Health Care Marketing 13(2) (1993) 18–25.
P.S. Raju, S.C. Lonial and Y.P. Gupta, Market orientation and performance in the hospital industry, Journal of Healthcare Marketing 15(4) (1995) 34–41.
F.D. Wolinsky, The Sociology of Health: Principles, Practitioners, and Issues, 2nd ed. (Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 1988).
B.J. Jaworksi and A.K. Kohli, Market orientation: antecedents and consequences, Journal of Marketing 57 (July 1993) 53–70.
K. Kumar, R. Subramanian and C. Yauger, Performance-oriented: toward a successful strategy, Marketing Health Services (Summer 1997) 10–20.
J.C. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978).
J.F. Hair, R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham and W.C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis, 4th ed. (Prentice-Hall, NJ, 1995).
J.L. Arbuckle, Amos User's Guide, Version 3.6 (Small Waters Corp., Chicago, IL, 1997).
K.A. Bollen, Structural Equations with Latent Variables (Wiley, New York, 1989).
Leamer, Specification Searches (Wiley, New York, 1978).
J.S. Long, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (Sage, Beverly Hills, 1983).
S. Sharma, Applied Multivariate Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1996).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raju, P., Lonial, S.C., Gupta, Y.P. et al. The relationship between market orientation and performance in the hospital industry: A structural equations modeling approach. Health Care Management Science 3, 237–247 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019061912075
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019061912075